Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 950 vs ARM Mali-G78 MP22

Samsung Xclipse 950

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 950

The Samsung Xclipse 950 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2500 SoC. It is based on an RDNA 3 architecture including ray tracing support. It uses 8 WGPs (compared to 6 in the previous generation Xclipse 940) and offers 28% faster ray tracing in hardware.

The Exynos 2500 is manufactured in the 3nm GAA process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G78 MP22

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP22

The ARM Mali-G78MP22 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E (e.g. Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6). It integrates 22 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 950ARM Mali-G78 MP22
Mali-G Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Pipelines8 - unified24 - unified
Shared Memoryyesno
technology3 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 26.05.2020
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11598 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
16653 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
9630 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
12079 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
20027 Points (10%)
6399 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
5151 Points (6%)
1805 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
33 fps (12%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
77 fps (14%)
31 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
189 fps (14%)
76 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
178 fps (17%)
64 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
281 fps (6%)
112 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
411 fps (17%)
154 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 950
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
499 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP22
232 fps (2%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
597510 Points (48%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
336 fps (8%)
74.4 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
19473 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
19956 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
11.8 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 950 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 37% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
100%
Xclipse 950:
57  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 950:
89  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 950:
60  fps
50%
Mali-G78 MP22:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 950:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 950:
115  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 950 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 50%

Samsung Xclipse 950ARM Mali-G78 MP22
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact57
PUBG Mobile89604030
Dead Trigger 2115
Samsung Xclipse 950ARM Mali-G78 MP22
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





2

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 14:16:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13074 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10957 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756383405s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Aug 2025 05:18:45 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.017s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13074 +0.007s ... 0.024s

#9 got single benchmarks 13074 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10957 +0s ... 0.028s

#11 got single benchmarks 10957 +0s ... 0.029s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.03s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.037s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.037s

#19 Got 8 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.04s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.04s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.04s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.042s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.042s

#24 return log +0s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)