Notebookcheck Logo

Vivo X300 vs X300 Pro: Full specs comparison including display, performance, cameras, and battery

Vivo X300 and X300 Pro showing front and rear designs with Zeiss camera module (Image source: Vivo)
Vivo X300 and X300 Pro showing front and rear designs with Zeiss camera module (Image source: Vivo)
The Vivo X300 series marks the brand’s latest flagship lineup featuring Zeiss optics, advanced AI imaging, and MediaTek’s new Dimensity 9500 platform. Both the Vivo X300 and X300 Pro share a similar foundation but differ in several key areas. This comparison highlights their main differences in design, display, camera setup, and performance specifications.

The Vivo X300 series represents the brand’s latest flagship effort, blending Zeiss optics, advanced AI processing, and MediaTek’s 3 nm Dimensity 9500 chip. While both models share the same core hardware, the X300 and X300 Pro differ in camera capabilities, form factor, and several key features. Here’s a closer look at their notable specifications and differences.

Display and build

SpecificationVivo X300Vivo X300 Pro
Dimensions (H × W × T)150.57 × 71.92 × 7.95 mm, 190 g161.98 × 75.48 × 7.99 mm, 226 g
Display6.31-inch AMOLED (LTPO), 2640 × 1216, 19.54:96.78-inch AMOLED (LTPO), 2800 × 1260, 20:9
Screen-to-body ratio94.66%94.85%
Colour, contrast & refresh rate1.07 b colours, 8,000,000:1, 1–120 Hz adaptive1.07 b colours, 8,000,000:1, 1–120 Hz adaptive
HDR supportYesYes

The Vivo X300 is more compact and lightweight, while the X300 Pro is larger and sturdier. The X300 measures 150.57 × 71.92 × 7.95 mm and weighs 190 g, whereas the X300 Pro comes in at 161.98 × 75.48 × 7.99 mm and 226 g.

The X300 features a 6.31-inch AMOLED display with a 2640 × 1216 resolution and a 19.54:9 aspect ratio, while the X300 Pro steps up to a 6.78-inch panel with a 2800 × 1260 resolution and a 20:9 aspect ratio. The Pro also achieves a slightly higher 94.85% screen-to-body ratio compared to 94.66% on the standard model.

Performance

Both models feature the same MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor built on a 3 nm process, with an 8-core configuration (1×4.21 GHz, 3×3.5 GHz, and 4×2.7 GHz) and a Mali-G1 Ultra GPU.

Close-up of Vivo X300’s front display (Image source: Vivo)
Close-up of Vivo X300’s front display (Image source: Vivo)
Rear view of Vivo X300 highlighting its circular Zeiss triple-camera module (Image source: Vivo)
Rear view of Vivo X300 highlighting its circular Zeiss triple-camera module (Image source: Vivo)

The only minor difference lies outside the CPU and GPU specifications — the Vivo X300 Pro 1TB Photographer Edition is equipped with LPDDR5X Ultra Pro four-channel RAM and adds satellite communication support, offering slightly improved memory bandwidth and additional connectivity options. However, the core processing performance remains the same across both models.

Camera differences

FeatureVivo X300Vivo X300 Pro
Rear CamerasTriple setup: 200 MP Zeiss Super Main (f/1.68) + 50 MP Zeiss APO Telephoto (f/2.57, 3× optical, 100× digital) + 50 MP Ultra-Wide (f/2.0)Triple setup: 50 MP Zeiss Gimbal Main (f/1.57) + 200 MP Zeiss APO Telephoto (f/2.67, 3.5× optical, 100× digital) + 50 MP Ultra-Wide (f/2.0)
Stabilisation & SensorsCMOS sensors with OIS on main & telephoto lensesCMOS sensors with Gimbal OIS on main & OIS on telephoto lenses
Video RecordingUp to 4K UHD and 4K slow-motionUp to 8K UHD and 4K slow-motion
Other FeaturesZeiss T* coating, autofocus on all lenses, modes like Portrait, Night, Panorama, Pro, FoodSame, with enhanced low-light and motion performance
Front Camera50 MP (f/2.0) with video stabilisation and portrait modes50 MP (f/2.0) with video stabilisation and portrait modes

The X300 features a 200 MP main camera with standard OIS, while the X300 Pro uses a 50 MP gimbal-stabilised main camera designed for better motion and low-light performance. The telephoto lens also differs — the X300 has a 50 MP sensor with 3× optical zoom, whereas the X300 Pro upgrades to a 200 MP Zeiss APO lens with 3.5× optical zoom. Additionally, the X300 Pro supports 8K video recording, compared to the X300’s 4K limit.

Battery and charging

FeatureVivo X300Vivo X300 Pro
Battery & Charging6,040 mAh (rated 5,925 mAh), 22.78 Wh energy cell; 90 W wired + 40 W wireless + OTG reverse charging6,510 mAh (rated 6,375 mAh), 24.55 Wh energy cell; same charging support
EnduranceUp to 19 days standby, 23.4 hrs VoLTE talk timeUp to 20.9 days standby, 28.1 hrs VoLTE talk time

The only difference between the two models lies in battery capacity and endurance. The Vivo X300 Pro houses a larger 6,510 mAh battery compared to the X300’s 6,040 mAh unit, resulting in slightly longer standby (20.9 days vs 19 days) and talk times (28.1 hours vs 23.4 hours).

Other features

Both smartphones run OriginOS 6 based on Android 16 and support dual 5G connectivity across major global bands. They also feature Wi-Fi 7 (2.4 GHz, 5.1 GHz, and 5.8 GHz) with 2×2 MIMO and MU-MIMO, Bluetooth 5.4 with codec support for SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0, NFC, and a USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C interface that supports DP projection and OTG reverse charging.

Vivo X300 Pro (top) and X300 (bottom) showing gold and pink finishes with circular Zeiss camera modules (Image source: Vivo)
Vivo X300 Pro (top) and X300 (bottom) showing gold and pink finishes with circular Zeiss camera modules (Image source: Vivo)

The key difference is that the Vivo X300 Pro Photographer Edition additionally supports Beidou satellite messaging, enabling short-message communication via satellite networks—an option not available on the standard X300.

Sensors

Both the Vivo X300 and X300 Pro include a comprehensive set of sensors, covering the accelerometer, ambient light sensor, proximity sensor, gyroscope, and electronic compass. Both also feature front and rear colour temperature sensors, a 3D ultrasonic single-point fingerprint sensor, a laser focus sensor, infrared remote control, a Flicker sensor, and an X-axis linear motor.

The only notable difference is that the X300 Pro includes a multi-spectral sensor, which Vivo claims is used for colour and ambient light data collection. The X300, on the other hand, features a Hall sensor for detecting magnetic accessories.

Variants and pricing

You can find the variants and pricing options for the Vivo X300 series here — one for the X300 Pro and another for the X300.

Source(s)

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2025 10 > Vivo X300 vs X300 Pro: Full specs comparison including display, performance, cameras, and battery
Anmol Dubey, 2025-10-13 (Update: 2025-10-13)