Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is an Arrow Lake-based desktop processor with 24 cores in two clusters. The 8 performance cores clock at up to 5.6 GHz and the 16 smaller efficiency cores at up to 4.6 GHz.

Due to the lower clock rate and the low TDP, the CPU performance is slightly below the Core Ultra 9 285K is positioned.

The Arrow Lake-S chips are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

The TDP is specified at 65 watts (long-term) to 182 watts (Turbo).

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

► remove from comparison
show full text
ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
CodenameArrow Lake-SArrow Lake-S
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-S
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K3.2 - 5.7 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 « 1.9 - 5.6 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare3 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare3.4 - 5 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz10 / 10 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K « 3.2 - 5.7 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 2851.9 - 5.6 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare3 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare3.4 - 5 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz10 / 10 cores20 MB L3
Clock1900 - 5600 MHz3200 - 5700 MHz
L2 Cache39.3 MB40 MB
L3 Cache36 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.6 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core		24 / 24
8 x 5.7 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2182 Watt250 Watt
Technology3 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketLGA1851
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT813 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285K
52 pt (87%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -96%
...
Intel Core i9-13900K
49 -6%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
49.1 -6%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
49.1 -6%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
49.5 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
49.9 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
50.4 -3%
Intel Core i9-14900K
51.1 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
51.5 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
52
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
52.1 0%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 16%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 143     avg: 144.5     median: 144.5 (81%)     max: 146 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2367     avg: 2398     median: 2395 (45%)     max: 2436 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 41911     avg: 42356     median: 42404 (39%)     max: 42705 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2342     avg: 2359     median: 2357.5 (99%)     max: 2377 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 899     avg: 909     median: 908.5 (99%)     max: 918 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 16435     avg: 16575     median: 16572 (40%)     max: 16722 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 6396     avg: 6472     median: 6451 (41%)     max: 6588 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 355     avg: 357.8     median: 357.5 (99%)     max: 361 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 70.77     avg: 74     median: 74 (96%)     max: 77.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.17     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (100%)     max: 4.21 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 12494     avg: 12522     median: 12521.5 (76%)     max: 12549 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 100637     avg: 102887     median: 102886 (75%)     max: 105136 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
156586 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
19296 Points (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 42.591     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (1%)     max: 48.806 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.12     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 2.197 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 12599     avg: 12772     median: 12771.5 (20%)     max: 12944 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 129542     avg: 129707     median: 129706 (74%)     max: 129871 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7288     avg: 7366     median: 7366 (87%)     max: 7444 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 296.5     avg: 297.8     median: 297.8 (8%)     max: 299 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 422     avg: 424     median: 424 (11%)     max: 426 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 45     avg: 45.4     median: 45.4 (80%)     max: 45.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.3     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (71%)     max: 2.5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (85%)     max: 5 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 16     avg: 16.7     median: 16.7 (43%)     max: 17.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 123     avg: 123.5     median: 123.5 (2%)     max: 124 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
79 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3796     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3833 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 21727     avg: 21932     median: 21932 (47%)     max: 22137 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.713     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 6.857 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.64     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (1%)     max: 14.936 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
130172 Points (100%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28636     avg: 29702     median: 29701.5 (73%)     max: 30767 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
104369 Points (85%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
104929 Points (85%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
108690 Points (87%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
29808 Points (75%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 53194     avg: 53836     median: 53541 (95%)     max: 54772 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 17911     avg: 18413     median: 18322 (77%)     max: 19007 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
3061 Points (74%)
min: 3260     avg: 3283     median: 3283 (79%)     max: 3306 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
19926 Points (77%)
min: 21507     avg: 21598     median: 21597.5 (84%)     max: 21688 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2366     avg: 2388     median: 2387.5 (91%)     max: 2409 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 25740     avg: 25963     median: 25963 (47%)     max: 26186 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2332     avg: 2351     median: 2350.5 (10%)     max: 2369 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 25793     avg: 25808     median: 25807.5 (81%)     max: 25822 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9791     avg: 9857     median: 9857 (98%)     max: 9923 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 92188     avg: 93778     median: 93777.5 (92%)     max: 95367 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 396     avg: 396.5     median: 396.5 (0%)     max: 397 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 345     avg: 350     median: 350 (96%)     max: 355 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 377     avg: 387     median: 387 (69%)     max: 397 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2529     avg: 2531     median: 2531 (95%)     max: 2533 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 379     avg: 380.5     median: 380.5 (66%)     max: 382 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 356     avg: 364.5     median: 364.5 (67%)     max: 373 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 76.2     avg: 86     median: 86 (57%)     max: 95.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.1     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (13%)     max: 18.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285K → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 08. 11:09:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18617 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18013 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759914570s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18617 +0s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 18617 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18013 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 18013 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.022s ... 0.042s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.043s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.051s

#15 return log +0.008s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)