Notebookcheck Logo
Motorola Moto G37 Review

The predecessor might actually be the better choice – Motorola Moto G37 Smartphone Review

Points for style.

The Motorola Moto G37 is an affordable 5G smartphone that stands out with its sleek design, solid battery life, and reliable Wi-Fi. However, our test revealed significant cost-cutting measures compared to the Moto G35—read here to find out why its predecessor is almost the better choice.
Florian Schmitt 👁 (translated by Florian Schmitt) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android ARM Smartphone

Verdict on the Motorola Moto G37

The Motorola Moto G37 is a very attractive phone that, thanks to its price, is suitable for people on a tight budget or as a secondary phone. You don’t have to sacrifice 5G; you get stable and sufficiently fast Wi-Fi data speeds as well as a reasonably bright screen.

The camera image quality is sufficient for basic needs, the fingerprint sensor works quite reliably, and the battery life is roughly on par with the competition.

However, there are also significant cost-cutting measures compared to its predecessor, the Moto G35—likely due to the sharp rise in memory prices: The wide-angle camera has been removed, the screen has a significantly lower resolution, there’s no protective case included in the box, the storage is noticeably slower, and eSIM support has also been removed.

The current generation of budget smartphones is characterized by cost-cutting measures. At the same time, older generations usually receive security updates for only a short time—if at all. If you can wait, you should hold off on buying a new phone model for another year or two until the situation on the memory market has eased up again.

If you absolutely have to buy one now, the Moto G37 is a solid, reasonably priced smartphone—though it lags behind the competition.

Pros

+ stylish design
+ 5G support
+ solid Wi-Fi data rates
+ precise, reliable touchscreen
+ decent battery life
+ expandable storage via microSD
+ no PWM flicker

Cons

- low display resolution
- poor everyday performance
- only 4 GB of RAM
- slow storage
- no wide-angle camera
- no 4K video recording
- no eSIM support
- short security update cycle
- slow charging

Price and Availability

notebooksbilliger.de

Motorola is asking just under US$ 300 for the Moto G37, e.g. at amazon.com.

Amazon Logo
Amazon
Motorola Moto G37 Dual-SIM 128GB ROM + 4GB RAM (GSM Only | No CDMA) Factory Unlocked 5G Smartphone (Pantone Nautical Blue) - International Version

Specifications

Motorola Moto G37 (Moto G30 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 6300 8c/8t, 2 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76, 6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.72 inch 20:9, 1604 x 720 pixel 262 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 104 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD, shared, up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 166.2 x 76.5 ( = 0.31 x 6.54 x 3.01 in)
Battery
5200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 20 Watt charging, 6 Watt wired reverse charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase shift AF, LED flash, videos @1440p/​30fps (camera 1); light sensor, flickering detector
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1440p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, IP64 certified, MIL-STD-810H certified; SAR: 0.90W/​kg head, 1.36W/​kg body, fanless
Weight
191 g ( = 6.74 oz / 0.42 pounds)
Price
250 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case and Features – Stylish colors, but limited storage

Motorola has adapted the Moto G37 to its current design line. That means three stylish Pantone colors (fuchsia, blue, and gray); internationally, a turquoise version is also available. In addition, the back is made of a soft plastic material and features a stylishly integrated camera module.

The transitions between the materials and the frame aren’t quite as seamless as on the manufacturer’s more expensive models, but the phone is solidly built and doesn’t bend.

It has IP64 certification, which means the phone can withstand dust and dirt well, though you shouldn’t submerge it in water.

It comes with 128 GB of storage and 4 GB of RAM; internationally, there are even versions with only 64 GB of storage. And we thought that kind of storage capacity was a thing of the past, even for budget phones...

Storage can be expanded using microSD cards, and the card reader performed quite quickly in our test.

Motorola Moto G37 Review
Motorola Moto G37 Review
Motorola Moto G37 Review
Motorola Moto G37 Review
Motorola Moto G37 Review
Motorola Moto G37 Review
Motorola Moto G37 Review
Motorola Moto G37 Review
Motorola Moto G37 Review

Size Comparison

166.3 mm / 6.55 in 76 mm / 2.99 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 188 g0.4145 lbs166.2 mm / 6.54 in 76.5 mm / 3.01 in 7.9 mm / 0.311 in 191 g0.4211 lbs164 mm / 6.46 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 185 g0.4079 lbs164 mm / 6.46 in 75.42 mm / 2.97 in 7.35 mm / 0.2894 in 178 g0.3924 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 in 78.2 mm / 3.08 in 7.4 mm / 0.2913 in 196 g0.4321 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (Angelbird V60)
37.6 MB/s
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760) (Angelbird V60)
36.4 MB/s -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.72 - 58.9, n=52, last 2 years)
32.6 MB/s -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
28.09 MB/s -25%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
5.72 MB/s -85%

Cross-Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115Tooltip
Motorola Moto G35 Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.2 (18.3-46.3) MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.3 (27.7-48.8) MB/s
CMF Phone 2 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.4 (24.4-42.2) MB/s
Motorola Moto G35 Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.1 (31.2-79.9) MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.8 (41.2-81.2) MB/s
CMF Phone 2 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71 (38.5-116.5) MB/s

Communication and Operation – Reliable touchscreen

Wi-Fi 5 is top-of-the-line, so the Moto G37 delivers expected speeds of around 260–330 Mbit/s. That’s not particularly fast, but for those who don’t have gigabit internet at home anyway and don’t plan to use the phone on a fast home network, it’s sufficient.

Some international cellular frequencies are missing, so before traveling abroad, you should check whether you can use the Moto G37 for mobile internet in your destination country. Reception proved to be solid in our test. In challenging situations, such as between tall buildings, however, the signal can occasionally drop out.

The display can render up to 120 frames per second, and the touchscreen is precise and reasonably responsive. A fingerprint sensor is built into the standby button on the right, which unlocks the phone reliably and quickly.

Networking
Motorola Moto G37
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
327 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼18%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
328 (min: 308) MBit/s ∼17%
Motorola Moto G35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
304 (min: 268) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
331 (min: 302) MBit/s ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 188) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
354 (min: 343) MBit/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
725 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
768 (min: 673) MBit/s ∼40%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
402 (min: 391) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
381 (min: 370) MBit/s ∼53%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
337 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
367 (min: 327) MBit/s ∼20%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
363 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼19%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
721 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
1852 (min: 327) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U
1923 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼100%
0100200300Tooltip
Motorola Moto G37; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U: Ø327 (263-350) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G37; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U: Ø328 (308-340) MBit/s

Software and Sustainability – Motorola with a short update cycle

Android 16 comes preinstalled, overlaid with MotoUI, which makes only minor changes to the original Android and tends to offload advanced features into its own apps.

New security updates are scheduled to be released through April 2029—which isn’t really long.

The packaging is plastic-free, but no further information on the phone’s sustainability is provided.

Cameras – Just two lenses

Front-facing camera photo
Front-facing camera photo

Although there are four camera cutouts on the back, only one is actually equipped with an image sensor: a 50-megapixel camera serves as the main camera.

It offers similar specifications to the Moto G35, but can no longer record 4K videos. The image quality is solid for this price range, and it handles low-light conditions quite well. However, the sharpness is only average.

The front camera takes decent photos, but you shouldn’t zoom in too much on them.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PlantSurroundingLow Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
9.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
15 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G37: 8.98 ∆E min: 2.89 - max: 16.39 ∆E
ColorChecker
26 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
29 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
55.6 ∆E
35 ∆E
38 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G37: 37.87 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 55.64 ∆E

Display – Saving on resolution

Cost-cutting measures are also evident in the IPS display: the resolution drops to 1,604x720 pixels.

This puts the phone behind similarly priced competitors, especially since those often feature significantly brighter OLED displays.

Color reproduction is quite accurate, but here, too, the competition is ahead.

876
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 876 cd/m² (Nits) Minimum: 3.1 cd/m²
Center on Battery: 876 cd/m²
Contrast: 1653:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.83 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.209
CCT: 7094 K
Motorola Moto G37
IPS, 1604x720, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G35
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
CMF Phone 2 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"
Display
274%
92%
29%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)
943
3430
264%
1839
95%
1215
29%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)
933
3582
284%
1752
88%
1198
28%
Response Times
-80%
94%
92%
96%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)
16.3 ?(11.3, 5)
39.2 ?(20, 19.2)
-140%
0.99 ?(0.43, 0.5615)
94%
1.57 ?(0.7655, 0.8085)
90%
0.54 ?(0.258, 0.286)
97%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)
19.6 ?(14.6, 5)
23.6 ?(11.3, 12.3)
-20%
1.13 ?(0.5435, 0.5845)
94%
1.39 ?(0.7115, 0.6765)
93%
0.93 ?(0.48, 0.45)
95%
PWM Frequency (Hz)
60
240
90
PWM Amplitude * (%)
13.61
16.58
13.04
Screen
-26%
31%
-18%
28%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
876
1069
22%
979
12%
1127
29%
1280
46%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.53
0.7
-32%
Contrast (:1)
1653
1527
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.83
3.32
-81%
1.3
29%
2.6
-42%
1.3
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.55
5.48
-20%
2.6
43%
5.3
-16%
3.9
14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
3.6
-38%
1.6
38%
3.7
-42%
2
23%
Gamma
2.209 100%
2.167 102%
2.23 99%
2.06 107%
2.14 103%
CCT
7094 92%
6141 106%
6688 97%
6496 100%
6776 96%
Brightness (cd/m²)
976
969
1277
Brightness Distribution (%)
88
95
97
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-53% / -40%
133% / 107%
55% / 37%
51% / 45%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7744 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN Color Space
CalMAN Color Space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms).

Performance, Emissions, and Battery Life – Low power, decent battery

The Moto G37, with its MediaTek Dimensity 6300, doesn’t really offer any more power than its predecessor. Its performance also lags significantly behind similarly priced competitors, and it doesn’t always run completely smoothly in everyday use.

At least the maximum temperature of the chassis under load is acceptable, and even after prolonged use, only minimal performance losses are noticeable.

The small speaker on the bottom edge is supplemented by the earpiece. Nevertheless, the sound profile is very treble-heavy, which isn’t particularly impressive. If you connect speakers or headphones via USB or Bluetooth, you’ll get clean sound. The selection of wireless codecs for audio transmission covers the most important options.

The battery has been designed with a slightly higher capacity of 5,200 mAh and offers about an hour more runtime in our Wi-Fi test. However, the competition is already ahead in this area as well. The phone can be charged at up to 20 watts; a full charge takes over 2 hours.

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=183, last 2 years)
1877 Points +140%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1140 Points +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1017 Points +30%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1011 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
782 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (733 - 798, n=7)
771 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
738 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11811, n=183, last 2 years)
5584 Points +331%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3505 Points +170%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2995 Points +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2963 Points +128%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
2168 Points +67%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (1297 - 2129, n=7)
1882 Points +45%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1297 Points
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4021 Points +193%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
3263 Points +138%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3159 Points +130%
Average of class Smartphone
  (270 - 7687, n=82, last 2 years)
3079 Points +124%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
1614 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1372 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (1221 - 1373, n=7)
1323 Points -4%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30892, n=168, last 2 years)
12680 Points +832%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4066 Points +199%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
3283 Points +141%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3150 Points +132%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
1599 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1360 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (1216 - 1360, n=7)
1306 Points -4%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8263, n=168, last 2 years)
3310 Points +762%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1015 Points +164%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
864 Points +125%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
857 Points +123%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
443 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
384 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (336 - 384, n=7)
368 Points -4%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 8271, n=167, last 2 years)
3299 Points +766%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
986 Points +159%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
854 Points +124%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
845 Points +122%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
434 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
381 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (341 - 385, n=7)
363 Points -5%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=178, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +258%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
43 fps +153%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
37 fps +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
31 fps +82%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
18 fps +6%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
17 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (9 - 30, n=7)
16.2 fps -5%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 378, n=178, last 2 years)
130.4 fps +586%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
51 fps +168%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
42 fps +121%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
40 fps +111%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
20 fps +5%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
19 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (15 - 19, n=7)
16.9 fps -11%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 144, n=179, last 2 years)
49.8 fps +315%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
29 fps +142%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
23 fps +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
21 fps +75%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
12 fps
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
11 fps -8%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (5.7 - 19, n=7)
10.2 fps -15%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 151, n=178, last 2 years)
50.6 fps +495%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
20 fps +135%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
15 fps +76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
15 fps +76%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.5 fps
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps -11%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (5.8 - 8.5, n=7)
6.5 fps -24%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 63, n=178, last 2 years)
23.2 fps +729%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8.7 fps +211%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
6.6 fps +136%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
6.5 fps +132%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
3.3 fps +18%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (2.4 - 2.8, n=7)
2.59 fps -7%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=117, last 2 years)
662 Points +187%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
231 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (211 - 235, n=5)
223 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
137 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
121 Points -48%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=117, last 2 years)
2588 Points +677%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (323 - 345, n=5)
337 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
333 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
138 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
124 Points -63%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 49889, n=117, last 2 years)
3879 Points +1738%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
449 Points +113%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
392 Points +86%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
211 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (203 - 215, n=5)
208 Points -1%
CrossMark
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (376 - 2856, n=103, last 2 years)
1263 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
842 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
786 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
551 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (549 - 552, n=5)
550 Points 0%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
Points -100%
Productivity
Average of class Smartphone
  (388 - 2366, n=103, last 2 years)
1133 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
855 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
690 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
621 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (618 - 622, n=5)
620 Points 0%
Creativity
Average of class Smartphone
  (310 - 2123, n=103, last 2 years)
1022 Points +117%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
704 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
602 Points +28%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
471 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (468 - 473, n=5)
470 Points 0%
Responsiveness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4177 Points +592%
Average of class Smartphone
  (466 - 13407, n=103, last 2 years)
4081 Points +576%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
853 Points +41%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
604 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (600 - 608, n=5)
604 Points 0%
Jetstream 2
2.0 Total
Average of class Smartphone
  (63.9 - 423, n=116, last 2 years)
163.4 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
147.778 Points
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
114.18 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (86.7 - 97.2, n=3)
92.9 Points
2.2 Total
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 480, n=88, last 2 years)
217 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
179.438 Points +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
149.405 Points +46%
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
102.322 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
  (96.8 - 102.3, n=2)
99.6 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G37Motorola Moto G35Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5GSamsung Galaxy A37 5GCMF Phone 2 ProAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
219%
192%
336%
219%
-18%
410%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
355.5
989.3
178%
911.87
157%
1986.3
459%
986.43
177%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
331.3
860.3
160%
867.34
162%
1732.34
423%
524.58
58%
196.6 ?(72.3 - 331, n=88)
-41%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
68.5
272.1
297%
222.77
225%
368.9
439%
294.62
330%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
93.8
318.9
240%
302.72
223%
115.25
23%
385.68
311%
Max. Load
 40.9 °C
106 F
38.2 °C
101 F
34 °C
93 F
 
 40.2 °C
104 F
37.1 °C
99 F
34 °C
93 F
 
 40.2 °C
104 F
35.7 °C
96 F
34.4 °C
94 F
 
Maximum: 40.9 °C = 106 F
Average: 37.2 °C = 99 F
36.7 °C
98 F
38.5 °C
101 F
40.1 °C
104 F
35.7 °C
96 F
36.9 °C
98 F
40.3 °C
105 F
35.7 °C
96 F
38.3 °C
101 F
41.3 °C
106 F
Maximum: 41.3 °C = 106 F
Average: 38.2 °C = 101 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.1 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola Moto G37
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 %
CMF Phone 2 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % -1%
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.1 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Moto G37
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 %
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.6 % -2%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 %
05101520Tooltip
Motorola Moto G37 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø2.3 (2.29-2.31) %
Motorola Moto G35 Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.7 (2.65-2.72) %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø5.2 (5.19-5.22) %
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø5.75 (5.73-5.78) %
Motorola Moto G37 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.31 (8.29-8.33) %
Motorola Moto G35 Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.81 (9.66-9.85) %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø19.6 (19.6-19.7) %
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.6 (23.5-23.6) %
CMF Phone 2 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.8-19) %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.27 (2.26-2.28) %
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø3.59 (3.57-3.6) %
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204.3-12.92512.2-8.33117.3-140183.65021.17.66327.16.98028.48.41002713.212523.920.31602430.92002341.325011.948.731513.852.540015.951.150016.356.2630963.48001568.6100015.481.9125017.282.4160016.579.3200014.580.7250013.680.9315016.878.6400014.673.3500023.970.8630016.564.3800015.869.51000014.175.31250016.972.11600013.257.5SPL29.489.8N168.3median 15.9median 68.6Delta2.912.336.632.426.225.820.22834.33039.239.42425.31424.113.723.214.426.61844.214.54714.753.213.255.512.350.910.955.211.558.611.365.611.470.311.68011.679.811.779.912.17912.379.812.772.713.170.113.175.51370.813.175.313.174136224.588.70.669median 13median 70.11.311.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G37Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G37 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G37
5200 mAh
Motorola Moto G35
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
5520 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
5000 mAh
CMF Phone 2 Pro
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-9%
-29%
-24%
-35%
-13%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.9
1.04
-16%
0.85
6%
1.04
-16%
1.108 ?(0.6 - 2.2, n=4)
-23%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.2
1.33
-11%
1.86
-55%
1.63
-36%
1.695 ?(0.9 - 2.7, n=4)
-41%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.4
1.38
1%
1.94
-39%
1.69
-21%
1.955 ?(1.3 - 3.1, n=4)
-40%
Load Average * (Watt)
4.05
Load Maximum * (Watt)
8.98

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 44min
Motorola Moto G37
5200 mAh
Motorola Moto G35
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
5520 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
5000 mAh
CMF Phone 2 Pro
5000 mAh
Battery runtime
-6%
7%
5%
3%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
17.7
16.7
-6%
19
7%
18.6
5%
18.3
3%
Reader / Idle (h)
36.6
H.264 (h)
21.1
Load (h)
4.2

Notebookcheck Overall Rating

If it weren’t for the brief security updates, you’d almost have to go back to the previous model—that’s how much Motorola has cut corners with the Moto G37.

There are still alternatives from other manufacturers, so we can only recommend our test unit to people who absolutely love its design and can snag it at a very affordable price.

Motorola Moto G37 Review. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Motorola Moto G37 Review. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Motorola Moto G37 - 07/30/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
39 / 69 → 56%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
7 / 55 → 13%
Application Performance
57 / 85 → 67%
AI Performance
18%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
58%
Average
59%
73%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
10%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
94.6%
Repairability
15%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 42.4%

Comparison of Possible Alternatives

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
72.7%
Motorola Moto G37
Motorola Moto G37
Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: List Price: 250€191 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.72"
1604x720
262 PPI
IPS
2.
72.3%
Motorola Moto G35
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.2
Amazon: List Price: 179€188 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.72"
2400x1080
392 PPI
IPS
3.
76.5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2
Amazon: $229.50
List Price: 300€
178 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED
4.
79%
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 530 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1
Amazon: List Price: 519€196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED
5.
76.9%
CMF Phone 2 Pro
CMF Phone 2 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2
Amazon: List Price: 279€185 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.77"
2400x1080
389 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > The predecessor might actually be the better choice – Motorola Moto G37 Smartphone Review
Florian Schmitt, 2026-07-30 (Update: 2026-07-30)