Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
In our review, the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G comes across as a solid mid-range smartphone, though it offers only a few new features compared to its predecessor. These include faster RAM and a new SoC: the Exynos 1480. The latter outperforms the Snapdragon in the Galaxy A36 in all benchmarks and delivers snappy system performance, though it struggles somewhat with demanding games. The memory also benefits from the SoC change, being about 100% faster despite using UFS 3.1.
However, the affordable entry-level version of the Galaxy A37 offers only 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage. We consider this insufficient in 2026, especially given the lack of microSD support. Especially since the smartphone is designed to last a long time, as it comes with six years of update support and is also part of Samsung’s Self-Repair Program.
The cameras have only seen minor changes, which isn’t enough when compared to the competition. This applies not only to the additional lenses but also to the main camera. The front camera stands out positively here, as it even supports UHD video recording.
At 5,000 mAh, the A37’s battery is the smallest among its competitors, but in testing, the Samsung phone proved to be very efficient and still managed to deliver long battery life. Samsung doesn’t go for the most extreme specs when it comes to fast charging either, but with a compatible 45-watt charger, the phone is fully charged in under 70 minutes.
In terms of connectivity, the Galaxy A37 impresses, as its 5G and Wi-Fi 6 capabilities provide a solid foundation, complemented by excellent voice quality. However, Auracast is not yet supported. It’s possible, though, that Samsung will add this feature via a future update.
At its MSRP, the Galaxy A37 is too expensive, especially since you’d be better off opting for the more expensive 256 GB model if you plan to use the smartphone for a long time. In the meantime, however, the phone has become significantly cheaper, and not only for that reason but also because of its strong core functionality, it’s definitely worth recommending.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
The Galaxy A37 5G is available directly from the Samsung Store in 6/128 GB and 8/256 GB configurations for an MSRP of $450 and $540, respectively. It’s significantly cheaper on Amazon.
Table of Contents
- Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
- Specifications: Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
- Body and features - Samsung cell phone is now waterproof
- Communication - Galaxy A37 with good call quality
- Cameras - Triple-lens setup with UHD Video
- Display - Bright, but darker than the rivals
- Performance, emissions and battery life
- Notebookcheck overall rating
- Possible alternatives at a glance
Specifications: Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Body and features - Samsung cell phone is now waterproof
The Samsung Galaxy A37 5G has the same dimensions as its predecessor and is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back. The plastic frame hardly detracts from the overall positive impression. It’s very well built and feels good in the hand. While it does bend slightly when twisted, the Galaxy A37 doesn’t make a sound.
While the Galaxy A36 still used a Snapdragon SoC, the A37 has now switched to Samsung’s in-house Exynos 1480. In addition, the smartphone is now IP68-certified, making it completely water- and dust-resistant. Unfortunately, the new high-gloss back panel is very prone to fingerprints.
Communication - Galaxy A37 with good call quality
The Samsung Galaxy A37 5G supports all current mobile communication standards, including 5G Sub-6, with broad but not complete frequency coverage. While it features Wi-Fi 6, a fast Wi-Fi standard, it lacks 6-GHz support.
The smartphone stands out for its call quality, which sounded very natural in our tests and reliably filtered out even loud ambient noise. In addition, it supports not only two nano-SIMs but also up to two eSIMs, either as an alternative or in mixed mode.
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
Cameras - Triple-lens setup with UHD Video
The camera setup has hardly changed from the Galaxy A36, but the main camera now supports HDR video and features larger pixels (1.0 µm), which promises improved image quality in low-light situations.
We can confirm the last point. The footage is now more uniform, but also a bit muddy. Footage shot in daylight appears slightly too bright and sometimes tends to be overexposed; the competition does a better job here.
| Aspect ratio | Resolution | |
|---|---|---|
| Photo | 4:3 / 16:9 / 1:1 / Full | 12 / 50 MPix |
| Video (main camera) | 16:9 / 1:1 / Full | HD (30 FPS)Full HD (30 / 60 FPS)Ultra HD (30 FPS) |
| Video (front camera) | 16:9 / 1:1 / Full | HD (30 FPS)Full HD (30 FPS)Ultra HD (30 FPS) |
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Display - Bright, but darker than the rivals
The Samsung Galaxy A37 5G’s Super AMOLED display appears unchanged from its predecessor, but measurements show that the HDR peak brightness is slightly lower and color accuracy is also slightly weaker. However, this isn’t noticeable in everyday use.
Unfortunately, the A37 still uses low-frequency PWM dimming, so people with sensitivity may experience discomfort during longer periods of use.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1127 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
CCT: 6496 K
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro AMOLED, 2756x1268, 6.6" | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 37% | 92% | 108% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1839 | 1953 6% | 3475 89% | 3775 105% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1752 | 2922 67% | 3406 94% | 3685 110% |
| Response Times | 4% | 19% | 9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.57 ? | 1.4 ? 11% | 1.11 ? 29% | 1.4 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.39 ? | 1.4 ? -1% | 1.05 ? 24% | 1.2 ? 14% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | 120.5 | 120 | 120 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 16.58 | 16 3% | 16.04 3% | 16 3% |
| Screen | 1% | 38% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1127 | 1155 2% | 1104 -2% | 1501 33% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.42 7% | 1.2 54% | 1.52 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.3 | 5.63 -6% | 2.4 55% | 3.47 35% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 3.7 -0% | 2.1 43% | 2.6 30% |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.246 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.184 101% |
| CCT | 6496 100% | 7263 89% | 6472 100% | 6444 101% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1136 | 1102 | 1476 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 97 | 96 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 14% /
10% | 50% /
43% | 51% /
43% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 16.58 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7784 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7115 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6765 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7655 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8085 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Performance, emissions and battery life
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 1480 (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 7% | 43% | 74% | 29% | 55% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1986.3 | 945 -52% | 3576.86 80% | 2049.4 3% | 1771 ? -11% | 2242 ? 13% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1732.34 | 837.4 -52% | 3565.14 106% | 1825.9 5% | 1234 ? -29% | 1924 ? 11% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 368.9 | 184 -50% | 324.76 -12% | 351.2 -5% | 289 ? -22% | 309 ? -16% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 115.25 | 326.1 183% | 112.05 -3% | 452.1 292% | 322 ? 179% | 361 ? 213% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
3DMark stress tests
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
Notebookcheck overall rating
In our review, the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G impressed with its high-quality build, excellent everyday usability, long battery life, and very good call quality; however, it offers few real innovations compared to its predecessor and lags behind the competition in terms of camera and display.
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
- 06/25/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives at a glance
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 79%  | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G Samsung Exynos 1480 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 530 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 519€ | 196 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
2. 77.6%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 210 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
3. 83.8%  | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 202 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2756x1268 460 PPI AMOLED |
4. 77.4%  | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 420€ | 193 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
