Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

► remove from comparison Intel T7500

The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.

At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.

Modern Penryn based Core  2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5900Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2200 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
65 nm65 nm1.075 - 1.250V
SocketSocket PPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
$234 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 0.93     avg: 1     median: 1 (2%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
min: 2190     avg: 2304     median: 2307.5 (21%)     max: 2389 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
min: 4182     avg: 4284     median: 4272.5 (6%)     max: 4473 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7500 +
37.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1879     median: 1906 (4%)     max: 1940 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
26 s (6%)
min: 22     avg: 22.7     median: 23 (5%)     max: 23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
65 s (3%)
min: 54     avg: 54.7     median: 54.7 (2%)     max: 55.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7500 +
1344 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
18700 MIPS (9%)
min: 19950     avg: 20064     median: 20063.5 (10%)     max: 20177 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 13944     avg: 13945     median: 13945 (11%)     max: 13946 MFLOPS
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7500 +
5984 Points (80%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4639 Points (29%)
min: 2095     avg: 4545     median: 4629 (29%)     max: 5785 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7500 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 103% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 03:37:57

#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 got single benchmarks 439 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0s ... 0.018s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.019s

#44 got single benchmarks 322 +0.045s ... 0.063s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.07s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#116 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.071s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.035s ... 0.106s

#118 return log +0.003s ... 0.11s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)