Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 ► remove
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600 , which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 ► remove
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 Intel Core 2 Duo Intel Core 2 Duo Merom Merom : Core 2 Duo Merom 2200 MHz 2200 MHz 800 800 128 KB 128 KB 2 MB 4 MB 2 / 2 2 / 2 35 35 65 65 1.075 - 1.250V Socket P PBGA479, PPGA478 MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT Virtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit 291 143 mm2 100 °C $234 U.S. Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 0.93 avg: 1 median: 1 (2%) max: 1.12 Points
Quadro FX 570M 0.93
Dell Latitude D830 Quadro NVS 140M 1.12
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 2116 avg: 2123 median: 2123 (22%) max: 2130 Points
Asus F70Sl GeForce 9300M GS 4096 580 / 400 MHz 512MB DDR2 ForceWare 176.40 2116
2130
min: 2190 avg: 2304 median: 2307.5 (24%) max: 2389 Points
Sony Vaio VGN-SZ61WN/C GeForce 8400M GS 2048 400 / 600 MHz 64MB 2190
Samsung X22-Pro Boyar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 2048 446 / 495 MHz 128MB 2245
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / 600 MHz 256MB GDDR3 7.14.10.0503 2298
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / 400 MHz 256MB ForceWare 101.34 2302
HP Pavilion HDX9130eg Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 400 / 400 MHz 256MB G-DDR 3 2313
One C7000 Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 650 / 700 MHz 256MB 2337
MSI GX600 Extreme GeForce 8600M GT 2048 / 400 MHz 512MB GDDR2 2358
Apple MacBook Pro 15" 2.2GHz GeForce 8600M GT 2048 470 / 635 MHz 128MB GDDR3 2389
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 3894 avg: 3997 median: 3997 (7%) max: 4100 Points
Asus F70Sl GeForce 9300M GS 4096 580 / 400 MHz 512MB DDR2 ForceWare 176.40 3894
4100
min: 4182 avg: 4284 median: 4272.5 (7%) max: 4473 Points
Sony Vaio VGN-SZ61WN/C GeForce 8400M GS 2048 400 / 600 MHz 64MB 4182
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / 600 MHz 256MB GDDR3 7.14.10.0503 4222
HP Pavilion HDX9130eg Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 400 / 400 MHz 256MB G-DDR 3 4239
One C7000 Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 650 / 700 MHz 256MB 4264
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / 400 MHz 256MB ForceWare 101.34 4281
Samsung X22-Pro Boyar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 2048 446 / 495 MHz 128MB 4301
MSI GX600 Extreme GeForce 8600M GT 2048 / 400 MHz 512MB GDDR2 4309
Apple MacBook Pro 15" 2.2GHz GeForce 8600M GT 2048 470 / 635 MHz 128MB GDDR3 4473
37.5 seconds (8%)
1890 Points (13%)
min: 1791 avg: 1890 median: 1911 (13%) max: 1940 Points
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 1791
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB GDDR3 1878
GeForce 8600M GT 1911
One C7000 Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 650 / 700 MHz 256MB 1930
Quadro FX 360M 2048 400 / 800 MHz 256MB DDR2 181.71 1940
3DMark 06 - CPU - Standard 1280x768 1280x768
1838 Points (60%)
Asus F70Sl GeForce 9300M GS 4096 580 / 400 MHz 512MB DDR2 ForceWare 176.40 1838
3DMark 06 - CPU - Standard 1280x1024
min: 1634 avg: 1842 median: 1885 (45%) max: 1913 Points
Aristo Vision i375+ GeForce 8600M GT 2048 512MB 1634
Dell XPS M1730 GeForce 8700M GT SLI 2048 625 / 800 MHz 256MB GDDR3 VRAM 1842
Dell XPS M1330 LED-backlit LCD GeForce 8400M GS 1024 128MB 1878
Samsung X65 Bekumar GeForce 8600M GS 2048 500 / 700 MHz 256MB GDDR3 VRAM 1892
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / 600 MHz 256MB GDDR3 7.14.10.0503 1892
HP Pavilion HDX9130eg Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 400 / 400 MHz 256MB G-DDR 3 1913
3DMark 06 - CPU - 1280x800
min: 1906 avg: 1911 median: 1908 (67%) max: 1921 Points
MSI Megabook GX700 GeForce 8600M GT 2048 475 / 400 MHz 512MB 1906
Alb RS13 GeForce 8400M G 3072 400 / 400 MHz 256MB 1906
Compal IFL90 GeForce 8600M GT 4096 513 / 400 MHz 512MB GDDR2, NB8P-GS 1908
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / 400 MHz 256MB ForceWare 101.34 1914
Samsung X22-Pro Boyar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 2048 446 / 495 MHz 128MB 1921
26 Seconds (6%)
min: 22 avg: 22.7 median: 23 (5%) max: 23 Seconds
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / 400 MHz 256MB ForceWare 101.34 22
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / 600 MHz 256MB GDDR3 7.14.10.0503 22.963
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 23
Compal IFL90 GeForce 8600M GT 4096 513 / 400 MHz 512MB GDDR2, NB8P-GS 23
65 Seconds (3%)
min: 54 avg: 54.6 median: 54.6 (2%) max: 55.271 Seconds
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 54
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / 600 MHz 256MB GDDR3 7.14.10.0503 55.271
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1344 Seconds (6%)
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 1344
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
18700 MIPS (9%)
min: 19950 avg: 20064 median: 20063.5 (10%) max: 20177 MIPS
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB GDDR3 19950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 20177
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 13944 avg: 13945 median: 13945 (11%) max: 13946 MFLOPS
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 13944
GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB GDDR3 13946
PCMark 04 - Standard 1024x768
5984 Points (80%)
Toshiba M9 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 1024 5984
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
4639 Points (29%)
Asus F70Sl GeForce 9300M GS 4096 580 / 400 MHz 512MB DDR2 ForceWare 176.40 4639
min: 2095 avg: 4545 median: 4629 (29%) max: 5785 Points
Nexoc E618 GeForce 8600M GS 2048 256MB 2095
Fujitsu-Siemens Lifebook S6410 02DE Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 1024 2351
Toshiba A9 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 2048 3402
Quadro NVS 140M 128MB 3988
Aristo Vision i375+ GeForce 8600M GT 2048 512MB 4211
Samsung X22-Pro Boyar Mobility Radeon HD 2400 2048 446 / 495 MHz 128MB 4227
Nexoc E619 (Compal IFL90) GeForce 8600M GT 2048 512MB 4349
Toshiba M9 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 1024 4378
Maxdata Belinea b.book 5 GeForce 8400M GS 2048 297 / 400 MHz 256MB ForceWare 101.34 4434
Alb RS13 GeForce 8400M G 3072 400 / 400 MHz 256MB 4559
Apple MacBook Pro 15" 2.2GHz GeForce 8600M GT 2048 470 / 635 MHz 128MB GDDR3 4576
Compal IFL90 GeForce 8600M GT 4096 513 / 400 MHz 512MB GDDR2, NB8P-GS 4629
Dell XPS M1330 LED-backlit LCD GeForce 8400M GS 1024 128MB 4682
Sony Vaio VGN-SZ61WN/C GeForce 8400M GS 2048 400 / 600 MHz 64MB 4845
Dell XPS M1730 GeForce 8700M GT SLI 2048 625 / 800 MHz 256MB GDDR3 VRAM 5017
Samsung X65 Bekumar GeForce 8600M GS 2048 500 / 700 MHz 256MB GDDR3 VRAM 5051
Asus W2W Mobility Radeon HD 2600 2048 500 / 600 MHz 256MB GDDR3 7.14.10.0503 5130
Lenovo Thinkpad T61p Quadro FX 570M 2048 256MB 5132
MSI Megabook GX700 GeForce 8600M GT 2048 475 / 400 MHz 512MB 5182
MSI GX600 Extreme GeForce 8600M GT 2048 / 400 MHz 512MB GDDR2 5192
Asus G1S GeForce 8600M GT 2048 256MB GDDR3 5568
Gateway P-6831FX GeForce 8800M GTS 3072 512MB 5746
One C7000 Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 650 / 700 MHz 256MB 5785
Windows Vista Experience Index - CPU
5.1 Points (73%)
MSI Megabook GX700 GeForce 8600M GT 2048 475 / 400 MHz 512MB 5.1
One C7000 Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT 2048 650 / 700 MHz 256MB 5.1
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 100% Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 102%
-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.11
#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s
#2 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 27 May 2020 19:00:02 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#3 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.061s ... 0.063s
#4 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.091s
#5 return log +0.008s ... 0.099s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
-