The Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. Compared to the C2D T5670, the T5600 features Virtualization functions VT-x, but lacks Idle Stats (according to the Intel HP).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 105%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 108%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 23. 22:30:51
#0 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:08:30 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.017s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0.001s ... 0.018s
#8 got single benchmarks 171 +0.033s ... 0.051s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.001s ... 0.052s
#10 got single benchmarks 340 +0.037s ... 0.089s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.001s ... 0.091s
#12 got single benchmarks 164 +0.024s ... 0.115s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.177s