The Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. Compared to the C2D T5670, the T5600 features Virtualization functions VT-x, but lacks Idle Stats (according to the Intel HP).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 100%n=12
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 106%n=12
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 114%n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 01. 12:03:56
#0 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:08:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0.002s ... 0.025s
#8 got single benchmarks 171 +0.038s ... 0.063s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.002s ... 0.065s
#10 got single benchmarks 168 +0.087s ... 0.151s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.002s ... 0.153s
#12 got single benchmarks 164 +0.029s ... 0.182s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.182s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.248s