Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2160 MHz
FSB667667
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 1.0375V-1.300V65 nm, 1.0375-1.3V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$286 U.S.$286 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

Benchmarks

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
min: 1633     avg: 1817     median: 1861 (4%)     max: 1895 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236 Points
257 Points (99%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
min: 23     avg: 24     median: 24 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
min: 58     avg: 59.3     median: 58 (2%)     max: 62 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
min: 1523     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (7%)     max: 1539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
min: 13249     avg: 18264     median: 18263.5 (9%)     max: 23278 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
min: 9696     avg: 12732     median: 12732 (10%)     max: 15768 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
683 Points (47%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
2091 Points (86%)
2230 Points (92%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
2018 Points (91%)
2080 Points (94%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
min: 7174     avg: 7329     median: 7376 (99%)     max: 7438 Points
min: 3716     avg: 4445     median: 4683 (29%)     max: 4859 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 107% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 30. 21:45:54

#0 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#41 got single benchmarks 168 +0.037s ... 0.045s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0s ... 0.045s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#44 got single benchmarks 164 +0.014s ... 0.06s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#116 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.069s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#118 return log +0.004s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)