Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Mediatek MT8183

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Mediatek MT8183

► remove from comparison MT8183

The Mediatek MT8183 is a mainstream ARM SoC (System on a Chip) that was introduced in Late 2019 and is primarily used for Android based tablets. It is manufactured in a 12 nm process (unverified) and has a total of eight CPU cores with four powerful Cortex-A73 and four small Cortex-A53 cores in a big.LITTLE configuration. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali-G72 with three clusters (MP3).

Features

Besides CPU and GPU, the chip is also equipped with an LPDDR3/LPDDR4x memory controller, a Wi-Fi 5 (a/b/g/n/ac) modem (but no cellular modem). Furthermore, Mediatek states that it integrated an AI accelerator with a performance of 0.5 TOPS.

The maximum display resolution is only 2,400 x 1,080 pixels.

show full text
ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 662Mediatek MT8183
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A73/-A53
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon Mediatek MT8
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 1 compare1.8 - 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology11 nm12 nm
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP32 MP Camera ISP, 1080p H.264 Video Encoder, H.265 Decoder
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G72 MP3
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -65%
...
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -32%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 -28%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3465 -25%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -5%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -4%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4616 -1%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641
UNISOC T610
0.4653 0%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 2%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 2%
UNISOC T618
0.475 2%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4763 3%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 3%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 3%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 4%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 180%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - MT8183
0.5 pt (36%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -65%
...
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -32%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -32%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 -28%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3465 -25%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 -19%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -5%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -4%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4616 0%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 0%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 0%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 2%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 2%
UNISOC T618
0.475 3%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4763 3%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 3%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 3%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 181%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (15%)     max: 19804 Points
min: 15776     avg: 18163     median: 18829 (15%)     max: 19883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1588     avg: 2240     median: 2272 (21%)     max: 2534 Points
min: 2085     avg: 2543     median: 2560.5 (24%)     max: 2966 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2146     avg: 2330     median: 2384 (27%)     max: 2502 Points
min: 2322     avg: 2590     median: 2543 (29%)     max: 2963 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (8%)     max: 333 Points
323 Points (7%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
1214 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 275     avg: 308.3     median: 309 (10%)     max: 316 Points
min: 260     avg: 292.8     median: 300 (10%)     max: 305 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 763     avg: 1299     median: 1295 (2%)     max: 1453 Points
min: 909     avg: 1208     median: 1293 (2%)     max: 1430 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1472 Points (15%)
min: 1397     avg: 1431     median: 1430.5 (14%)     max: 1464 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4938 Points (5%)
min: 5308     avg: 5377     median: 5376.5 (5%)     max: 5445 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
1395 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
4968 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 5754     avg: 6212     median: 6212 (10%)     max: 6670 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 1410     avg: 1469     median: 1468.5 (22%)     max: 1527 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 MT8183 +
805 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 MT8183 +
1718 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 MT8183 +
10758 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 MT8183 +
5381 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 MT8183 +
6072 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
min: 3957     avg: 4403     median: 4337.5 (5%)     max: 4979 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (6%)     max: 10247 Points
min: 8665     avg: 9742     median: 9822 (6%)     max: 10670 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (9%)     max: 59 Points
min: 46     avg: 54.3     median: 55.5 (10%)     max: 60 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
32912 Points (28%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
32293 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
25424 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
67925 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
158554 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (10%)     max: 211557 Points
160693 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (16%)     max: 68731 Points
69184 Points (17%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
16222 Points (2%)
1079%
MT8183 +
175006 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (14%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (7%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (10%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (5%)     max: 12884 Points
min: 6087     avg: 13047     median: 13046.5 (6%)     max: 20006 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (20%)     max: 7554 Points
min: 5224     avg: 5900     median: 5830.5 (20%)     max: 6716 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
min: 2714     avg: 3143     median: 3143 (17%)     max: 3572 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
min: 6470     avg: 11152     median: 11152 (24%)     max: 15834 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5866     avg: 6258     median: 6139 (40%)     max: 7184 Points
min: 5056     avg: 5633     median: 5264 (34%)     max: 6735 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7247     avg: 7986     median: 8000.5 (40%)     max: 8714 Points
min: 6284     avg: 7442     median: 7441.5 (37%)     max: 8599 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
105%
1 MT8183 +
min: 3.4     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.44 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (1%)     max: 1.953 Watt
87%
1 MT8183 +
min: 1.871     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (1%)     max: 1.889 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8183 → 138% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 17. 16:39:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11547 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765985975s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.012s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11547 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 11547 +0.008s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.042s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.043s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.052s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.053s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.053s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.054s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.055s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.073s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)