Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 636

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (SDM636) is a mid-range octa-core SoC with eight custom Kryo 260 cores at up to 1.8 GHz, an Adreno 509 GPU, a LPDDR4-2666 memory controller (1333 MHz) and a X12 LTE (Cat 12/13, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Furthermore, the chip supports 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFet. Qualcomm states a 40% faster performance compared to the old Snapdragon 630 (8x ARM Cortex-A53).

Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7420

The Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa (also called Exynos 7 Octa) is a high-end system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in March 2015 alongside the Samsung Galaxy S6 and features four Cortex-A57 cores clocked at up to 2.1 GHz. Furthermore, there are four additional Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.5 GHz, an ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU and a 2x 32 bit LPDDR4-3104 memory controller (up to 24.8 GB/s). It is one of the first fully 64-bit capable ARM SoCs for Android devices.

Processor

Cortex-A57 and Cortex-A53 represent the successors of the Cortex-A15 and Cortex-A7 architecture. In addition to some small tweaks leading to a somewhat higher performance per clock, both Cortex-A57 and -A53 are now 64-bit capable ARMv8 designs (Cortex-A15 and -A7: 32 bit ARMv7). Thanks to its advanced 14 nm process, clocks and performance of the Exynos 7420 are quite stable even in long-lasting benchmarks. Overall, the cpu performance is above the Nvidia Tegra K1 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 810

While the powerful Cortex-A57 cores will handle complex software and games, the SoC can switch to the more efficient Cortex-A53 cluster in less demanding applications. If necessary, it's possible to activate individual cores from each cluster or even all eight cores at the same time. This concept developed by ARM is known as "big.LITTLE" and intended to improve the battery life.

Graphics

The Exynos 7420 integrates a Mali-T760 MP8 GPU, which offers eight shader clusters clocked at up to 772 MHz (302 GFLOPS). The Mali-T760 supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1 and DirectX 11 and offers a performance above the Adreno 430 (Snapdragon 810) or PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). Thus, the GPU is one of the high-end solutions as of 2015 and can handle even the most demanding Android games in high resolutions (Galaxy S6: 2560 x 1440 pixels) and detail settings.

Power Consumption

The Exynos 7 Octa is the first smartphone SoC to be manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs (Samsung LPE). Therefore, the Exynos 7420 is one of the most energy efficient chips in early 2015 and runs much cooler than the competing Qualcomm Snapdragon 810.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 636Samsung Exynos 7420 OctaQualcomm Snapdragon 662
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A57/-A53Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A57/-A53
Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa1.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A57/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1800 MHz2100 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology14 nm14 nm11 nm
FeaturesAdreno 509 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Spectra 160 ISPARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU (773 MHz), 4x Cortex-A57 (2.1 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory ControllerAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 509ARM Mali-T760 MP8 (700 - 772 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15766     avg: 17020     median: 16939 (14%)     max: 19365 Points
min: 16117     avg: 17761     median: 17400 (15%)     max: 19260 Points
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 2258     avg: 2372     median: 2345 (28%)     max: 2644 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 2288     avg: 2386     median: 2359 (27%)     max: 2683 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (10%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
278 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
1256 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 1323     avg: 1351     median: 1337 (13%)     max: 1506 Points
110%
1 SD 662 +
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 4781     avg: 4960     median: 4941 (5%)     max: 5426 Points
100%
1 SD 662 +
4938 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1309 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4058 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4843     avg: 4958     median: 4958 (9%)     max: 5073 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1146     avg: 1238     median: 1237.5 (24%)     max: 1329 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4207     avg: 4933     median: 4953 (8%)     max: 5619 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1202     avg: 1386     median: 1410 (21%)     max: 1520 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 636 +
2016 Points (16%)
2410 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 636 +
2801 Points (25%)
3734 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 636 +
8155 Points (16%)
10547 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 636 +
4063 Points (8%)
4350 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
5063 Points (13%)
6201 Points (16%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
839 MFLOPS (28%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
626 MFLOPS (61%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4105     avg: 4688     median: 4739.5 (6%)     max: 5066 ms
min: 4037     avg: 4731     median: 5067 (6%)     max: 5089 ms
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
9121 ms (100%)
min: 347.1     avg: 518     median: 546 (6%)     max: 689 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 564     avg: 633     median: 632.5 (6%)     max: 701 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8163     avg: 8665     median: 8559 (8%)     max: 9746 Points
min: 7534     avg: 8336     median: 8518 (8%)     max: 9253 Points
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 46     avg: 54.4     median: 54 (11%)     max: 61 Points
96%
1 SD 662 +
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 2583     avg: 2627     median: 2613 (70%)     max: 2686 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 2951     avg: 3162     median: 3109 (69%)     max: 3425 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 4666     avg: 4957     median: 4742 (63%)     max: 5463 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 33360     avg: 34836     median: 34729 (80%)     max: 36419 points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 56852     avg: 65987     median: 68265.5 (69%)     max: 72094 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 92015     avg: 98051     median: 95445 (33%)     max: 125213 Points
77963 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 115565     avg: 118863     median: 116748 (21%)     max: 138661 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 636 +
27466 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 636 +
30326 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 636 +
24483 Points (4%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 636 +
62945 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
145220 Points (14%)
122%
1 SD 662 +
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
2156 Iter./s (66%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
23154 Iter./s (76%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 157795     avg: 157981     median: 157981 (21%)     max: 158167 Points
min: 162584     avg: 169599     median: 169794 (22%)     max: 176225 Points
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 3056     avg: 3090     median: 3071.5 (16%)     max: 3160 Points
104%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 3406     avg: 5546     median: 5299.5 (11%)     max: 8180 Points
152%
1 SD 662 +
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6040     avg: 6624     median: 6457 (32%)     max: 7618 Points
min: 5050     avg: 5098     median: 5113 (26%)     max: 5130 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa → 98% n=5

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 92% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 12. 15:32:18

#0 checking url part for id 9956 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6662 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:37:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9956 +0.003s ... 0.054s

#8 got single benchmarks 9956 +0.027s ... 0.081s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6662 +0.003s ... 0.084s

#10 got single benchmarks 6662 +0.013s ... 0.097s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.014s ... 0.111s

#12 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.034s ... 0.145s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.145s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.211s ... 0.356s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.356s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)