Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7530U vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135U

AMD Ryzen 5 7530U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7530U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. It is part of the second "Barcelo" refresh in early 2023 and offers 200 MHz higher boost clock for the CPU cores compared to the old Ryzen 5 5625U (but a slower base clock speed). The R5 7530U integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture. The cores are clocked at 2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (single core boost) and support SMT for a total of 12 threads. The chip is manufactured in 7 nm at TSMC.

Performance

The average 7530U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 5625U, Ryzen 7 4800U, Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, Core i5-1335U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 37 W, the VivoBook 15X OLED M3504YA is among the fastest laptops built around the 7530U that we know of. It can be roughly 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 (now only called Radeon Graphics) integrated graphics card with 7 CUs at up to 2 GHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

Power consumption

This Ryzen has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the Power Limit 1).

Intel Core Ultra 5 135U

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 135U

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135U is mid-range Meteor Lake chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 12 cores and 14 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 2, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.4 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 4-core Intel Arc Graphics, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 1.90 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.1 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 135U comes with 12 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a decent number of PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 7.8 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. Naturally, the 135U also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 135U is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 135U will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be somewhat faster than the Core i7-1355U (Raptor Lake, 10 cores, 12 threads, up to 5.0 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 4-core Arc Graphics runs at up to 1.90 GHz. We expect the iGPU to be just slightly slower than the aging 96 EU Iris Xe meaning you will be able to play most games at 1080p as long as most settings are set to Low.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc Graphics is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 5 series processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W, with 57 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. An active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 135U is comprised of several small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7530UIntel Core Ultra 5 135U
CodenameBarcelo-U RefreshMeteor Lake-P
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Meteor Lake-U
Series: Meteor Lake-U Meteor Lake-P
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U compare2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U compare2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U « 2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135U « 3.6 - 4.4 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz12 / 14 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 115U compare0.7 - 4.2 GHz8 / 10 cores10 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4500 MHz3600 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1212 / 14
2 x 4.4 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.1 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.95 °C110 °C
SocketFP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterp., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 1900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7530U
33.9 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 135U
33.6 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
83 Points (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
455 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6931     avg: 8479     median: 8418.5 (8%)     max: 9347 Points
9315 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1371     avg: 1438     median: 1443 (61%)     max: 1470 Points
1563 Points (66%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 528     avg: 561     median: 565 (62%)     max: 574 Points
605 Points (66%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2833     avg: 3304     median: 3288 (8%)     max: 3655 Points
3641 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1289     avg: 1447     median: 1457.5 (9%)     max: 1599 Points
1634 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 213     avg: 229.5     median: 230.5 (64%)     max: 237 Points
228 Points (63%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 32204     avg: 37957     median: 37983 (22%)     max: 42364 MIPS
38415 MIPS (22%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5113     avg: 5328     median: 5339 (63%)     max: 5544 MIPS
4649 MIPS (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.17     avg: 10.3     median: 10.7 (19%)     max: 11.6 fps
10.3 fps (18%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 583     avg: 694     median: 674 (9%)     max: 820 Seconds
687 Seconds (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 330     avg: 377.3     median: 362 (3%)     max: 469 Seconds
358 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.515     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.567 sec
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10189     avg: 11861     median: 12224 (30%)     max: 12926 Points
14632 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75967     avg: 78857     median: 78857 (64%)     max: 81747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
84092 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
87410 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9155     avg: 11259     median: 11233 (28%)     max: 12903 Points
10633 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14264     avg: 18380     median: 19207 (34%)     max: 20296 Points
19641 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4384     avg: 5399     median: 5619 (24%)     max: 5891 Points
5741 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1913     avg: 1941     median: 1941 (48%)     max: 1969 Points
2176 Points (54%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 6099     avg: 6500     median: 6500 (25%)     max: 6901 Points
9514 Points (37%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1805     avg: 1840     median: 1827 (58%)     max: 1887 Points
2080 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 5411     avg: 6002     median: 6016 (25%)     max: 6580 Points
9014 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1393     avg: 1464     median: 1479 (58%)     max: 1498 Points
1568 Points (61%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5475     avg: 6121     median: 6390 (11%)     max: 6648 Points
8533 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1312     avg: 1377     median: 1376.5 (6%)     max: 1441 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6233     avg: 6397     median: 6396.5 (20%)     max: 6560 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 614     avg: 650     median: 629 (1%)     max: 770 ms
578 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
72262 Points (53%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 183.4     avg: 205.6     median: 209 (57%)     max: 214 Points
230 Points (63%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 244     avg: 261.5     median: 264 (47%)     max: 272 Points
246 Points (44%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1029     avg: 1228     median: 1231 (46%)     max: 1336 Points
1287 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.5     avg: 41.4     median: 41.8 (7%)     max: 52.5 Watt
33.7 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.2     avg: 47.1     median: 48.2 (9%)     max: 59.9 Watt
47.5 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.43     avg: 5.5     median: 6 (4%)     max: 7.3 Watt
2.2 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.25     avg: 6.5     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 7.64 Watt
2.3 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.7     avg: 32     median: 28.8 (21%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7530U → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 135U → 109% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 13. 00:32:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14958 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16917 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755037930s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14958 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 14958 +0.002s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16917 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 16917 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.044s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)