Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 1500X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

AMD Ryzen 5 1500X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 1500X

The AMD Ryzen 5 1500X is a desktop processor with 4 cores and Hyper Threading (SMT). It is the fastest Ryzen 5 quad-core processor in the beginning of 2017, but the 65-watt TDP is similar to the hexa-core Ryzen 5 1600.

The Ryzen 5 1500X has a base frequency of 3.5 GHz and can reach up to 3.7 GHz via Turbo (up to 2 cores) or 3.9 GHz via XFR (also up to 2 cores).

The processor based on the Zen architecture is not fully convincing in games. AMD blames missing optimizations from the gaming producers.

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.3 (base) - 3.8 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.

Compared to the older Ryzen 7 2700U for slim and light laptops, the 2800H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.4 versus 2.2 GHz), and a faster integrated GPU.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 2800H as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 15% faster than Ryzen 3 1200, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. All the values are rather high, making a high-performance cooling solution with two or three fans pretty much a necessity.

The CPU is built on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 1500XAMD Ryzen 7 2800H
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenRaven Ridge (Zen)
Series: Ryzen 5 Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X « 3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 compare3.2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3500 - 3700 MHz3300 - 3800 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP65 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4800 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4FP5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.95 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 1500X
27.8 pt (39%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4586     avg: 4597     median: 4597 (4%)     max: 4608 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 938     avg: 947     median: 947 (40%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 346     avg: 360     median: 360 (40%)     max: 374 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1777     avg: 1783     median: 1783 (4%)     max: 1789 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 796     avg: 806     median: 805 (5%)     max: 818 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 142     avg: 151     median: 154 (46%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4573 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
20186 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
210.6 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3910 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 21495     avg: 21743     median: 21842 (13%)     max: 21891 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3768     avg: 3858     median: 3865 (46%)     max: 3942 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
49.5 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
177 fps (41%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.09     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (9%)     max: 5.12 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.9 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 585     avg: 586     median: 586 (4%)     max: 587 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.699     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.738 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7403 Points (16%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
640 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
9566 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
61854 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7712 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4067 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 917     avg: 919     median: 918.5 (39%)     max: 920 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3997     avg: 4604     median: 4603.5 (8%)     max: 5210 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
915 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4035 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4105     avg: 4282     median: 4282 (43%)     max: 4459 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15016     avg: 15134     median: 15134 (17%)     max: 15252 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4149 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14463 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
16558 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4248 Points (64%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
11011 Points (89%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
8616 Points (78%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
15951 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
13689 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
13198 Points (35%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 966     avg: 975     median: 974.5 (1%)     max: 983 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
74.8 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
36017 Points (32%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 176     avg: 177.5     median: 177.5 (37%)     max: 179 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
146 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
132 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
6.2 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 1500X → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 19:08:18

#0 checking url part for id 9166 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10144 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9166 +0.02s ... 0.045s

#7 got single benchmarks 9166 +0.011s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10144 +0.003s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 10144 +0s ... 0.059s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.161s ... 0.221s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.246s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)