Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR G6200 vs Qualcomm Adreno 630 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644

PowerVR G6200

► remove from comparison Imagination PowerVR G6200

The PowerVR G6200 from Imagination Technologies is a mobile graphics solution that is used in ARM SoCs like the MediaTek MT8135. The chip is available since 2014 and designed for mid-range devices.

Architecture and Performance

The GPU is based on the series 6 (Rogue) and integrates two clusters with two TMUs each and a scalar Unified Shader architecture. Depending on the available memory bandwidth and clock rate, the performance is similar to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 and ARM Mali-T624 MP4. High-resolution displays (up to 2560 x 1600 pixels) and demanding mobile games of 2014 will be handled without problems. Among others, the GPU supports OpenGL 3.x/4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0 as well as DirectX 10.

Clock rates and performance of the G6200 may vary between different SoCs. For example, the Mediatek MT6795 has a somewhat higher GPU frequency than the MT8135 (700 vs. 600 MHz).

Energy Consumption

Especially the lower clocked versions of the G6200 are very energy efficient and therefore suited for medium-sized smartphones and tablets. Usually, the GPU can be found in SoCs manufactured in 28nm.

Qualcomm Adreno 630

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 630 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SoC for smartphones. It was introduced in early 2018 and can be found in high-end Android smartphones. 

According to Qualcomm 30% faster than the old Adreno 540 in the Snapdragon 835 with 30% less power consumption.

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

PowerVR G6200Qualcomm Adreno 630Qualcomm Adreno 644
Adreno 600 Series
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR G6400 @ 0.4 - 0.53 GHz
PowerVR G6200 64 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
CodenameRogue
ArchitecturePowerVR Rogue
Pipelines64 - unified
Core Speed450 - 700 MHz
Shared Memorynoyesyes
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
FeaturesOpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement10.09.2013 12.02.2018 07.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.imgtec.com
technology10 nm4 nm
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in PowerVR G6200GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT6595 Turbo8 x 2500 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT65958 x 2200 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT6595M8 x 2000 MHz? MHz450 MHz
min. - max.? MHz450 - 700 MHz
CPU in Adreno 630GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8508 x 2750 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8458 x 2800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 10551     avg: 10808     median: 10862 (1%)     max: 10955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 5877     avg: 6207     median: 6304 (1%)     max: 6440 Points
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 9647     avg: 10504     median: 10686 (1%)     max: 11180 Points
30971 Points (3%)
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825     avg: 832     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 15.6     median: 14 (3%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 29     avg: 35.2     median: 37 (3%)     max: 38 fps
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
3.2 fps (0%)
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
7.2 fps (0%)
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR G6200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 14     avg: 14.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 630
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
170281 Points (14%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
60.5 fps (100%)
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
6.4 fps (30%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
60.4 fps (90%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3960     avg: 4040     median: 4039.5 (1%)     max: 4119 Points
min: 10791     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (4%)     max: 13082 Points
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 998     avg: 1002     median: 1002 (2%)     max: 1006 Points
min: 4195     avg: 4225     median: 4225 (7%)     max: 4255 Points
42541 Points (70%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2793     avg: 2805     median: 2805 (61%)     max: 2817 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks PowerVR G6200 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 914% n=5

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 1846% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 644:
45  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
low 1920x1080
Adreno 630:
29.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 630:
27.8  fps
low 1280x720
Adreno 630:
0 (!)  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
Adreno 630:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 30 35 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 36 fps
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 57 fps
ultra
Adreno 630:
44 58 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 59 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 630:
60 60 109 ~ 76 fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Adreno 630:
6  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 630:
5  fps
high 1366x768
Adreno 630:
5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 630:
3  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 630:
29  fps
high
Adreno 630:
30  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 630:
29 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 30 30 30 61 ~ 34 fps
low 1280x720
Adreno 630:
20  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 630:
14  fps
high 1366x768
Adreno 630:
13  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 630:
4  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
Adreno 630:
60  fps
high
Adreno 630:
101  fps
low 1024x768
Adreno 630:
10.3  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps
Minecraft - Pocket Edition

Minecraft - Pocket Edition

2011
ultra
Adreno 630:
60  fps
PowerVR G6200Qualcomm Adreno 630Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile604036604040
Dead Trigger 26060
Subway Surfers6061
PowerVR G6200Qualcomm Adreno 630Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1

1


1
2









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 28. 19:33:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5995 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756402405s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Aug 2025 05:18:45 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5995 +0.015s ... 0.035s

#10 got single benchmarks 5995 +0.006s ... 0.041s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0s ... 0.041s

#12 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.019s ... 0.06s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.061s

#14 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.001s ... 0.061s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.071s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.074s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.075s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.091s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.091s

#22 Got 106 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.102s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.102s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.104s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.111s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.111s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.111s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)