Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N6000 vs Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Celeron N5105

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6000

The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6000 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process, the same process as Ice Lake.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 850 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4x memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6000 in our database proves to be an OK entry-level processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. While a whole lot slower than the latest Ryzen 3 or Core i3 chips, at least this Pentium will let you run essential day-to-day apps without annoying slowdowns.

Power consumption

Just like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, Pentium N6000 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The SoC is built with Intel's first-generation 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. The Celeron was announced in early 2021. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz (base clock speed) Boosting up to 2.9 GHz (single-core Boost) with 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache but no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology. This processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen 10 nm process to be not unlike the Ice Lake-U Core-series processors. The faster Celeron N5105 is notable for being more energy efficient (10 W TDP vs N5095's 15 W) yet featuring a faster iGPU model (24 EU UHD Graphics versus 16 EU UHD Graphics, with a higher clock rate to boot).

Architecture

Tremont architecture brings many improvements over the outgoing Goldmont architecture we know from Pentium N5030 and so many other N-class CPUs. According to Intel, the new architecture brings a 30% boost in single thread performance (+10% to +80% in SPECint and SPECfp depending on the test).

While the older N-class Celerons and Pentiums had to be content with up to 8 GB of DDR4-2400 RAM, Celeron N5095 is officially compatible with up to 16 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 or quad-channel LPDDR4x-2933 memory. Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) support is partially baked into the chip. The Celeron supports up to 8 PCI-Express 3.0 lanes, up to 14 USB 3.2 ports and up to two SATA III ports. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Jasper Lake processor package is larger compared to what Gemini Lake models had (35 x 24 mm vs. 25 x 24 mm). Please note that the Celeron gets soldered on to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database matches Intel Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and AMD Ryzen 3 3200U, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Even if the cooling system is great and the Power Limits are high as the sky, some slight architectural improvements together with the updated manufacturing node and higher-than-usual wattage of the Celeron are not nearly enough to let it compete with modern Core and Ryzen-series processors. It's a good option for basic day-to-day tasks, but anything beyond that will be a struggle.

Graphics

The CPU features the DirectX 12-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics iGPU running at 450 MHz to 750 MHz. The graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 displays with resolutions up to [email protected]; it will happily decode HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs. The latest AV1 codec is not supported, though. (You can still play such a video but it will be software-decoded rather than hardware-decoded which puts a hard limit on the watchable resolution as the CPU cores are not very fast here.)

This is not a gaming GPU by any stretch of imagination. It is just as fast as an HD Graphics 515; it will let you play the least demanding titles (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided you are OK with 720p resolution and lowest quality preset possible.

Power Consumption

Most N-class Celerons and Pentiums have a 6 W TDP (also known as the Power Limit 1). Celeron N5095 on the other hand has a 15 Watt TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core i3/i5/i7 processors. Long-term performance sustainability is therefore destined to be an issue in passively cooled designs.

This Intel processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen 10 nm process for OK (as of late 2022) energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N5105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5105

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive desktops and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5105 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

Thanks to the new CPU architecture, the performance of the N5105 should be slightly faster compared to the old Pentium N5030. The Pentium N6000 however offers clearly higher clock speeds and also a faster gPU. However, it should still lag behind modern Core processors of the Tiger Lake generation. Therefore, the CPU is intended for basic tasks like office suits, web browsing with moderate multitasking.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (mobile and lower clocked N5100 6W). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N6000Intel Celeron N5095Intel Celeron N5105
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameJasper LakeJasper LakeJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 « 1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 3300 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP6 Watt15 Watt10 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1338FCBGA1338
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics (32 EUs, 350 - 850 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 16 GB LPDDR4x-2933 RAMIntel UHD Graphics (16 EUs, 450 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 16 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4x-2933Intel UHD Graphics (24 EUs, 450 - 800 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 16 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR4x-2933
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (350 - 850 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (450 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Jasper Lake Pentium N6000Intel Jasper Lake Celeron N5095Intel Jasper Lake Celeron N5105

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6000
23.9 pt (27%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
24 pt (27%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5105
24.2 pt (27%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1610     avg: 1730     median: 1699 (3%)     max: 1911 Points
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (4%)     max: 2219 Points
2175 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 653     avg: 669     median: 672.5 (30%)     max: 679 Points
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (27%)     max: 621 Points
618 Points (27%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 237     avg: 253.8     median: 255 (29%)     max: 268 Points
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (27%)     max: 239 Points
235 Points (27%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 595     avg: 657     median: 650.5 (3%)     max: 730 Points
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (4%)     max: 844 Points
826 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 266     avg: 292.5     median: 291 (3%)     max: 322 Points
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (4%)     max: 379 Points
368 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 109     avg: 114.3     median: 113.7 (35%)     max: 121 Points
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (32%)     max: 109 Points
108.1 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3.47     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (5%)     max: 3.71 Points
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (7%)     max: 4.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (4%)     max: 1.46 Points
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (4%)     max: 1.29 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4057     avg: 4132     median: 4131.5 (25%)     max: 4206 Points
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9343     avg: 9643     median: 9642.5 (7%)     max: 9942 Points
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (12%)     max: 17278 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (29%)     max: 5451 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
727 s (9%)
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.9 s (3%)
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1330 Points (8%)
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (10%)     max: 1781 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 8096     avg: 8953     median: 9212 (6%)     max: 9668 MIPS
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (7%)     max: 11168 MIPS
11153 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2320     avg: 2934     median: 3305 (40%)     max: 3387 MIPS
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
3108 MIPS (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.4 fps (7%)
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (9%)     max: 25.25 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
93.4 fps (22%)
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (27%)     max: 120.25 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.76 fps
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (8%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.8 GB/s (9%)
2.5 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
3786 Seconds (48%)
2936 Seconds (37%)
2940 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1738     avg: 2163     median: 1935 (14%)     max: 3157 Seconds
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
1573 Seconds (11%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.278 sec
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
1.2 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3985 Points (8%)
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
20.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
45.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
895 s (4%)
1039 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3134     avg: 3617     median: 3563 (10%)     max: 4155 Points
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (12%)     max: 4439 Points
4394 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 30345     avg: 32921     median: 32921 (27%)     max: 35497 Points
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (35%)     max: 42494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 30120     avg: 32790     median: 32790 (27%)     max: 35460 Points
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (35%)     max: 42477 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 38897     avg: 43994     median: 43993.5 (37%)     max: 49090 Points
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (40%)     max: 48186 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2524     avg: 2897     median: 2947 (7%)     max: 3220 Points
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
3869 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3838     avg: 4315     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 5296 Points
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
5498 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1161     avg: 1301     median: 1259.5 (6%)     max: 1523 Points
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (8%)     max: 1696 Points
1643 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 720     avg: 728     median: 727 (31%)     max: 736 Points
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (28%)     max: 659 Points
653 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1784     avg: 1912     median: 1915 (7%)     max: 2004 Points
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (7%)     max: 2052 Points
2080 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 723     avg: 725     median: 724.5 (3%)     max: 726 Points
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
649 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1881     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (6%)     max: 1942 Points
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
2069 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3188 Points (33%)
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (30%)     max: 2929 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8341 Points (9%)
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (9%)     max: 7968 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1388     avg: 1412     median: 1405 (2%)     max: 1451 ms
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
1582 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
293.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25840     avg: 32251     median: 34145.5 (32%)     max: 34874 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104.2 Points (31%)
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (28%)     max: 96.2 Points
96.2 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 138.4     avg: 143.8     median: 146 (34%)     max: 147 Points
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (29%)     max: 127.2 Points
134.2 Points (31%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 440     avg: 469     median: 469 (18%)     max: 498 Points
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (19%)     max: 495 Points
531 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.3     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
24 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 10.5     avg: 13.3     median: 12.9 (3%)     max: 16.4 Watt
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (5%)     max: 23 Watt
22.7 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.1 Watt (3%)
4.9 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.37     avg: 5.4     median: 4.8 (6%)     max: 8.08 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 19.6     avg: 22.3     median: 20.6 (24%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (20%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt
16.2 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6000 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 109% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5105 → 110% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 31. 04:30:07

#0 checking url part for id 13075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 May 2023 13:55:04 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13075 +0.013s ... 0.056s

#8 got single benchmarks 13075 +0.022s ... 0.077s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.008s ... 0.086s

#10 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.017s ... 0.102s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.008s ... 0.11s

#12 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.007s ... 0.117s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.117s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.341s ... 0.459s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.459s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)