AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a mobile Dual-Core-SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen+ cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.6 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Ryzen 3 3200U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3200U should be faster than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300UAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U (compare)2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 24 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U (compare)2300 - 4000 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U (compare)2100 - 3700 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U (compare)2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2100 - 3500 MHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3200U2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U (compare)2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz2 / 24 MB
2100 - 3500 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
384 KB192 KB
2 MB1 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 42 / 4
15 15
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) PRO 3300U

Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
274 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Multi Core)
453 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
481 Points (11%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480Tooltip
315 Points (7%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points (58%)
130 Points (60%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
5.5 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
1.4 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
4258 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9284 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
22657 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6410 Points (60%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
484 seconds (6%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
14 seconds (3%)
WinRAR - Result
1613 KB/s (19%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
19.5 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
97.8 fps (35%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
1.9 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
2.2 GB/s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
3755 Points (25%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.5 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
29 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
730 Seconds (3%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
5408 points (26%)
3835 points (19%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
41939 Points (27%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
42486 Points (51%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
49505 Points (57%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
4646 Points (12%)
3329 Points (8%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
6596 Points (22%)
4947 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
7535 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
5586 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
3282 Points (68%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
3673 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score
20649 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
7237 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
3626 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
3758 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
7733 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
830 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
1769 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
1374 ms (2%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
130 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
23991 Points (46%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 97%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)