AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove AMD R3 PRO 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a mobile Dual-Core-SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen+ cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.6 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Ryzen 3 3200U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3200U should be faster than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300UAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Zen+Zen+
: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 3200U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 24 MB
2100 - 3500 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
384 KB192 KB
2 MB1 MB
4 MB4 MB
4 / 42 / 4
15 15
4500 4500
12 12
AM4AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) R3 PRO 3300U
105 °C

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 274     avg: 293     median: 292.5 (46%)     max: 311 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 453     avg: 590     median: 590 (6%)     max: 727 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
481 Points (11%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480Tooltip
min: 318     avg: 326     median: 326 (7%)     max: 334 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
126 Points (46%)
min: 126     avg: 128     median: 128 (47%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.5 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4258 (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9284 (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
22657 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6410 Points (48%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
484 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1613 (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8984 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3406 MIPS (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
19.5 fps (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
97.8 fps (29%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.864     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (6%)     max: 2.03 fps
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (0%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1439 Seconds (10%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (18%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3755 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.5 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
29 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
730 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
5408 Points (22%)
min: 3653     avg: 3744     median: 3744 (15%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 41939     avg: 43929     median: 43929 (28%)     max: 45919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 42486     avg: 43044     median: 43044 (46%)     max: 43602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46717     avg: 48111     median: 48111 (50%)     max: 49505 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4646 Points (12%)
min: 3329     avg: 3346     median: 3345.5 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
6596 Points (17%)
min: 4947     avg: 5094     median: 5094 (13%)     max: 5241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1509     avg: 1525     median: 1524.5 (11%)     max: 1540 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7535 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5586 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7816 Points (20%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6922 (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3282 (67%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7496 (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3673 (75%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3626 (56%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7237 (18%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (49%)     max: 3758
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (11%)     max: 7733
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (49%)     max: 830
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (10%)     max: 1769
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Single-Core
813 (47%)
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1604 (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1225     avg: 1300     median: 1299.7 (2%)     max: 1374.4 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
130 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
23991 Points (38%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 78% n=5

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)