Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N97 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Intel Processor N97

► remove from comparison Intel N97

The Intel Processor N97 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance should be between the Intel Processor N100 and Intel Processor N200 and clearly below the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. 

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N97 has a base power consumption of 12 W and therefore double the amount of the N100. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 3500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

ModelIntel Processor N97AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
CodenameAlder Lake-NZen+
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock <=3600 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 8
TDP12 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB
Transistors4500 Million
SocketAM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N97
25.8 pt (43%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 3500U
24.7 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N97 +
63 Points (35%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N97 +
192 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N97 +
2913 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N97 +
973 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N97 +
371 Points (40%)
min: 354     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (39%)     max: 369 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N97 +
1115 Points (3%)
min: 1328     avg: 1339     median: 1338.5 (3%)     max: 1349 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
479 Points (3%)
min: 611     avg: 624     median: 624 (4%)     max: 637 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
161 Points (45%)
min: 140     avg: 142     median: 142 (39%)     max: 144 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N97 +
6 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N97 +
1.9 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N97 +
5445 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N97 +
15323 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N97 +
24158 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N97 +
8567 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N97 +
523 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N97 +
16.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N97 +
2321 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N97 +
13174 MIPS (8%)
min: 15910     avg: 16221     median: 16220.5 (9%)     max: 16531 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N97 +
4019 MIPS (47%)
min: 3432     avg: 3474     median: 3474 (41%)     max: 3516 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N97 +
34.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N97 +
174.8 fps (4%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N97 +
3.5 fps (6%)
min: 3.36     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (6%)     max: 3.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N97 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N97 +
0.5 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N97 +
2.9 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N97 +
2014 Seconds (26%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N97 +
1020 Seconds (7%)
min: 786     avg: 796     median: 795.5 (6%)     max: 805 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N97 +
0.8 sec (17%)
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N97 +
6461 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N97 +
18.4 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N97 +
38.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N97 +
786 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N97 +
15578 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N97 +
6118 Points (15%)
min: 5150     avg: 5781     median: 5781 (14%)     max: 6412 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N97 +
50003 Points (41%)
43514 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N97 +
50545 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N97 +
52858 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N97 +
4565 Points (12%)
min: 5629     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (15%)     max: 6090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N97 +
6473 Points (12%)
min: 8547     avg: 8809     median: 8808.5 (16%)     max: 9070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N97 +
2493 Points (11%)
min: 2595     avg: 2638     median: 2638 (11%)     max: 2681 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1300 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
3181 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1247 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
3029 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N97 +
1060 Points (40%)
863 Points (33%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
2757 Points (5%)
2824 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1052 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
2738 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N97 +
4703 Points (47%)
3820 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
10893 Points (11%)
10419 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N97 +
975 ms (1%)
min: 1097     avg: 1211     median: 1211 (1%)     max: 1325 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 27185     avg: 27437     median: 27437 (20%)     max: 27689 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N97 +
145.3 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N97 +
191.4 Points (34%)
142 Points (25%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N97 +
844 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
37.1 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
28.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
13.5 Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N97 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 102% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 03:10:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14969 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11334 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759108215s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:17:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14969 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 14969 +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11334 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 11334 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.036s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)