Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Celeron N3350

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Celeron N3350

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron N3350 is an Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W).

Amusingly enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Celeron as of late 2022, albeit the price has dropped from about $100 to about $20 per unit making the CPU even more popular with ultra-budget nettop and laptop makers.

Architecture & Features

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Celeron is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products (hello, Raspberry Pi).

The Celeron N3350 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture. This replaces the dated Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements and making for a double-digit IPC improvement. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations.

The Celeron is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Celeron is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the Atom x5-Z8300 and the Core 2 Duo SU7300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is not fast at all. In fact, the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as Intel's very own Core i3-7130U. A proper x86 CPU, Celeron N3350 will let you run nearly any Windows app, the caveat being that you will have to wait for several seconds every time you click on something. Windows 10 takes nearly a minute to fully boot with this CPU.

Graphics

The Intel HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is the highlight of this little Celeron. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD Graphics 500 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 2160p60. It will happily decode VP9 and AVC-encoded videos, too. These are the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on, as of 2021.

It's not all roses and sunshine. To keep power consumption under control, the number of Execution Units was reduced to 12 (the HD Graphics 520 has 24 EUs at its disposal, for reference). Besides, the UHD Graphics runs at up to 650 MHz which is not a lot. Very few games will be playable on this graphics solution - mostly, ones that were released in the 2000s or even in the 1990s.

Power consumption

The Celeron's default TDP (also known as the Power Limit 1) is 6 W, making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, makes for a much more responsive user experience, speaking subjectively.

Energy efficiency isn't great here, as Intel's 14 nm processes are very old as of mid 2022.

ModelIntel Processor N100Intel Celeron N3350
CodenameAlder Lake-NApollo Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Apollo Lake
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Celeron J3455 compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 « 1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1000 - 3400 MHz1100 - 2400 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 / 2
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1264BGA1296
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$128 U.S.$24 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache2 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
24.4 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N3350
11.2 pt (19%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (34%)     max: 61 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2449     median: 2559.5 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
328 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N100 +
min: 747     avg: 885     median: 910.5 (38%)     max: 942 Points
252 Points (11%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N100 +
min: 285     avg: 338     median: 347 (38%)     max: 358 Points
min: 100     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (11%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N100 +
min: 590     avg: 934     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
min: 151     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (0%)     max: 190 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 246     avg: 384.6     median: 401.5 (3%)     max: 479 Points
min: 81     avg: 85.4     median: 85 (1%)     max: 92 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 118.8     avg: 143.8     median: 147.9 (41%)     max: 155 Points
min: 43     avg: 45.7     median: 46 (13%)     max: 48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 3.84     avg: 4.6     median: 4.2 (5%)     max: 5.99 Points
min: 1.07     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4896     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
min: 1458     avg: 1570     median: 1490 (9%)     max: 1917 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 12281     median: 11207 (8%)     max: 15336 Points
min: 1775     avg: 2505     median: 2654 (2%)     max: 2787 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 18829     median: 16948 (11%)     max: 24225 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7699     median: 7750 (9%)     max: 8227 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 569     median: 588.3 (7%)     max: 645.884 s
min: 1225     avg: 1300     median: 1258 (15%)     max: 1418 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 16.2 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
min: 42.2     avg: 46.1     median: 45.5 (9%)     max: 50.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2343     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
616 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N100 +
min: 7532     avg: 11072     median: 11663.5 (7%)     max: 13291 MIPS
min: 2692     avg: 2980     median: 2979.5 (2%)     max: 3267 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N100 +
min: 3046     avg: 3629     median: 3653.5 (43%)     max: 3958 MIPS
min: 1653     avg: 1724     median: 1723.5 (20%)     max: 1794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N100 +
min: 20.85     avg: 27.1     median: 24.1 (1%)     max: 34.7 fps
6.2 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N100 +
min: 101.8     avg: 134.8     median: 121.2 (3%)     max: 173 fps
32.5 fps (1%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N100 +
min: 1.72     avg: 2.8     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.49 fps
min: 0.63     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.65 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N100 +
min: 0.529     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
0.7 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2545     median: 2067 (26%)     max: 3964 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1322     median: 1198.5 (8%)     max: 1956 Seconds
min: 6275     avg: 6276     median: 6276 (44%)     max: 6277 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
min: 2.21     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (50%)     max: 2.433 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5232     median: 4838 (10%)     max: 6441 Points
min: 1624     avg: 1655     median: 1654.5 (4%)     max: 1685 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
min: 27.5     avg: 29.2     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 32.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N100 +
min: 40.302     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.679 s
min: 61.2     avg: 64.5     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 71.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N100 +
min: 816.966     avg: 836     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 863.891 s
min: 1515     avg: 1532     median: 1538 (7%)     max: 1543 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 12661     median: 11998 (9%)     max: 15625 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 3723     avg: 5317     median: 5940 (15%)     max: 6486 Points
min: 1159     avg: 1294     median: 1333 (3%)     max: 1356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 42619     median: 41217 (33%)     max: 51063 Points
min: 11556     avg: 12344     median: 12344 (10%)     max: 13132 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 42751     median: 41809 (34%)     max: 51420 Points
min: 11665     avg: 12042     median: 12041.5 (10%)     max: 12418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52331     median: 52418.5 (42%)     max: 53373 Points
min: 10653     avg: 12775     median: 13161.5 (11%)     max: 14698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 3133     avg: 3959     median: 4061.5 (10%)     max: 4693 Points
min: 941     avg: 986     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1029 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 5806     median: 6371 (11%)     max: 6602 Points
min: 1293     avg: 1412     median: 1412 (3%)     max: 1501 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 1999     median: 2054 (9%)     max: 2519 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1195     median: 1221.5 (30%)     max: 1245 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2937     median: 3157 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 571     avg: 1024     median: 1173 (37%)     max: 1177 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1356     avg: 2544     median: 2846.5 (12%)     max: 3126 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 915     avg: 981     median: 986 (37%)     max: 1018 Points
min: 310     avg: 320     median: 320 (12%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1911     avg: 2598     median: 2829 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
min: 591     avg: 606     median: 605.5 (1%)     max: 620 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 968     avg: 990     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
309 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 2278     avg: 2624     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
587 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 4278     avg: 4440     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
min: 1374     avg: 1473     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1529 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 10361     avg: 11002     median: 11197 (11%)     max: 11264 Points
min: 2427     avg: 2599     median: 2619.5 (3%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1464     avg: 1491     median: 1500 (17%)     max: 1510 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2529     avg: 2589     median: 2589 (3%)     max: 2648 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2409     avg: 2468     median: 2467.5 (4%)     max: 2526 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1314     avg: 1328     median: 1327.5 (17%)     max: 1341 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1049     median: 1024.5 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
min: 3108     avg: 3519     median: 3443 (4%)     max: 4230 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 255     avg: 370.3     median: 299.2 (3%)     max: 628 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
N100 +
50984 Points (37%)
min: 8457     avg: 9831     median: 9492.5 (7%)     max: 11461 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 133.5     median: 134.3 (37%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N100 +
min: 156.3     avg: 170.5     median: 170.9 (31%)     max: 187.4 Points
min: 49.2     avg: 55.4     median: 52.2 (9%)     max: 68 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3574 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
7138 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5377 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
7007 Points (35%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N100 +
min: 706     avg: 779     median: 786 (29%)     max: 839 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 21.2     median: 21.7 (4%)     max: 29.1 Watt
8.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20.9     median: 24 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
6.7 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.3     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 10.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.92     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 6.77 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N100 +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt
12.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3350 → 30% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 02. 00:50:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8185 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759359033s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.012s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8185 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 8185 +0.008s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.084s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)