Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Average of 4 scores (from 6 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Mini Me(diaPad). The 8-inch variant of the MediaPad M3 Lite brings a lot of polish and panache to the Android ecosystem. Despite its mid-range specifications, the M3 Lite proves to be a capable media machine. Is this the affordable compact tablet to get?
Source: Tech Nave
So that's it, did we miss out any other features that should be on this list? Let us know in the comments below. The Mediapad M3 lite is now available in space grey and gold with a free case at every Huawei Experience Store, authorised sellers across the nation and online on Vmall.my, thanks for reading and stay tuned for more tech articles from TechNave.com.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/12/2018
Source: Computer Shopper
The Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite delivers a premium display at a price that won’t burn your budget. Pick this tablet if you plan to do a lot of reading on your 8-inch slate, and want the sharpest, brightest display you can buy for the dollar. Others will beat it on performance and battery life, but if you prefer not to see the pixels that make up text letters, then this is the best full-bore 8-inch Android tablet for the price. Just count on carrying a power pack or battery backup if you’re on the road.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: KL Gadget Guy
As a mid-range tablet, the Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite certainly ticks a few boxes for what it is meant to be, it has a great pair of features, decent enough everyday performance and battery life, all of this would cost you a RM999 price tag, which is pretty affordable and it does serve as a serious contender to Samsung's Galaxy Tab A tablets.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ofertaman ES→EN
Positive: High autonomy; good hardware; nice display; metal case; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: No HDMI output; no GPS.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/31/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% price: 80% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
CommentQualcomm Adreno 505: Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
435: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7) modem. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display size is a threshold between tablets and smartphones. Most tablets have larger screen diagonals but a lot of smartphones offer such a big screen.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
This weight is somewhat high for a smartphone. Smartphones with a big screen and small tablets weigh as much, usually.
Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese company founded in 1987 with focus on telecommunications hardware and 170000 employees. In the first quarter of 2016, Huawei had a market share of 8.2% in the smartphone market, making it the third-largest smartphone manufacturer in the world. Compared to the same quarter of 2015, Huawei increased its market share by more than 58%.
In 2014, Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. The name Huawei is usually not listed for these products.
There are a lot of reviews on Huawei phones with slightly above average ratings (as of 2016).
75.58%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.