Medion Lifetab P10612
Specifications
Medion Lifetab P10612 (Lifetab Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
2048 MB
, DDR3
Display
10.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 226 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
Connections
Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD, microUSB
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 262 x 157 ( = 0.35 x 10.31 x 6.18 in)
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Qualcomm® Quick Charge 3.0
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: Virtual
Weight
580 g ( = 20.46 oz / 1.28 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
200 Euro
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
price: - %, performance: 60%, features: - %, display: 76% mobility: 72%, workmanship: - %, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Medion Lifetab P10612
Medion Lifetab P10612
Source: Android Mag
DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 76% mobility: 72%
Source: Android Mag
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 76% mobility: 72%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505: Mid range graphics card integrated in the Snapdragon 430 and 435 SoCs. Based on the 500 generation and supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
430: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X6 LTE (Cat. 4) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
