Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 9810

Samsung Exynos 9825

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9825

The Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.73 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.4 GHz (up from 2.3 GHz in the 9820). Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP (with EUV) process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos 9820.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 855

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 2.84 GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The higher ‘Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980.

The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE Cat.20 and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too.

Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to 802.11 ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds.

The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit (NPU) with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC.

The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption.

The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM (4 x 16-bit). Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855.

Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power (TDP) of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around 3.5 W under load.

Samsung Exynos 9810

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9810

The Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series (at least partly). It integrates eight CPU cores (octa core) in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at 2.9 GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 1.9 GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung (most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898).

The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports Cat.18/13 LTE for up to 1.2 Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload.

As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 (only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20). Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card.

The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos (as before 4k120 H.265/HEVC, H.264 and VP9 de- and encoding). 

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process (the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process) that should also help with some of the performance gains.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9825Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Samsung Exynos 9810
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
CodenameExynos M3 / Cortex-A55Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Series: Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9825 « 1.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 - 2.96 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus - 2.96 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 « 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores5 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Samsung Exynos 98251.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 « - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Clock1900 - 2730 MHz2840 MHz <=2900 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm10 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerX24 LTE Modem, Adreno 640 GPUARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 (max 2.9 GHz), 4x Cortex-A55 (max 1.9 GHz) big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G76 MP12Qualcomm Adreno 640 ( - 585 MHz)ARM Mali-G72 MP18
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.comnews.samsung.com
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache5 MB
TDP5 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855
1 pt (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 31908     avg: 32588     median: 32588 (27%)     max: 33268 Points
min: 18756     avg: 23944     median: 26226 (22%)     max: 26851 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3389     avg: 3519     median: 3519 (41%)     max: 3649 Points
min: 2546     avg: 2717     median: 2601.5 (31%)     max: 3120 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3498     avg: 3622     median: 3622 (41%)     max: 3746 Points
min: 2561     avg: 2752     median: 2649.5 (30%)     max: 3148 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 855 +
1008 Points (31%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 855 +
2757 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
834 Points (35%)
89%
1 SD 855 +
min: 552     avg: 717     median: 744 (31%)     max: 751 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2331 Points (4%)
114%
1 SD 855 +
min: 2164     avg: 2572     median: 2666 (5%)     max: 2856 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 805     avg: 814     median: 813.5 (4%)     max: 822 Points
679 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2184     median: 2184 (7%)     max: 2191 Points
min: 2441     avg: 2616     median: 2589.5 (8%)     max: 2852 Points
2033 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4549     avg: 4550     median: 4550 (45%)     max: 4551 Points
min: 3688     avg: 3721     median: 3698 (37%)     max: 3776 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10367     avg: 10426     median: 10425.5 (12%)     max: 10484 Points
min: 10187     avg: 10955     median: 10987.5 (12%)     max: 11388 Points
min: 8786     avg: 8874     median: 8874 (10%)     max: 8963 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5109 Points (70%)
min: 3295     avg: 3548     median: 3548 (48%)     max: 3801 Points
3786 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10487 Points (26%)
min: 10163     avg: 10529     median: 10529 (26%)     max: 10895 Points
8491 Points (21%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7453 Points (12%)
0 Points (0%)
min: 5895     avg: 5915     median: 5915 (9%)     max: 5935 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2169 Points (32%)
0 Points (0%)
min: 1961     avg: 1965     median: 1965 (29%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 855 +
9555 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 855 +
2891 Points (56%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3566 Points (29%)
min: 1658     avg: 1926     median: 1926 (16%)     max: 2194 Points
min: 895     avg: 1039     median: 1039 (8%)     max: 1183 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5534 Points (50%)
min: 3919     avg: 4247     median: 4247 (39%)     max: 4575 Points
min: 1898     avg: 2002     median: 2001.5 (18%)     max: 2105 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
13991 Points (27%)
min: 11986     avg: 14903     median: 14902.5 (29%)     max: 17819 Points
min: 10213     avg: 10328     median: 10328 (20%)     max: 10443 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7083 Points (14%)
min: 5470     avg: 6620     median: 6619.5 (13%)     max: 7769 Points
min: 5651     avg: 5656     median: 5656 (11%)     max: 5661 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
8839 Points (23%)
min: 7059     avg: 8575     median: 8574.5 (22%)     max: 10090 Points
min: 6025     avg: 6099     median: 6098.5 (16%)     max: 6172 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2478     avg: 2503     median: 2503 (3%)     max: 2528 ms
min: 1852     avg: 2147     median: 2114 (2%)     max: 2611 ms
min: 2060     avg: 2509     median: 2394 (3%)     max: 3189 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 855 +
384.2 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 18908     avg: 19022     median: 19021.5 (17%)     max: 19135 Points
min: 17011     avg: 23749     median: 24044 (22%)     max: 33918 Points
min: 12933     avg: 14397     median: 14711.5 (13%)     max: 15233 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 97     avg: 107.5     median: 107.5 (22%)     max: 118 Points
min: 90     avg: 105.2     median: 106.5 (22%)     max: 129 Points
min: 63     avg: 67.8     median: 68 (14%)     max: 72 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 291772     avg: 292608     median: 292608 (100%)     max: 293444 Points
min: 214090     avg: 218110     median: 217950 (74%)     max: 222290 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 18280     avg: 18321     median: 18320.5 (56%)     max: 18361 Points
min: 7800     avg: 8235     median: 8294 (25%)     max: 8612 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 70640     avg: 70670     median: 70669.5 (87%)     max: 70699 Points
min: 53528     avg: 55588     median: 55698 (68%)     max: 57538 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 155432     avg: 155907     median: 155906 (48%)     max: 156381 Points
min: 91292     avg: 92956     median: 92887 (29%)     max: 94690 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 101869     avg: 102259     median: 102259 (63%)     max: 102649 Points
min: 80534     avg: 86884     median: 88577 (54%)     max: 91540 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 347082     avg: 347156     median: 347156 (61%)     max: 347229 Points
min: 217967     avg: 354450     median: 368232 (65%)     max: 398720 Points
min: 236552     avg: 243663     median: 243861 (43%)     max: 250577 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 51228     avg: 63930     median: 64229 (54%)     max: 72343 Points
58288 Points (49%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 52596     avg: 61638     median: 59373 (48%)     max: 75544 Points
51005 Points (41%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 158097     avg: 167704     median: 167146 (31%)     max: 175532 Points
117851 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 114777     avg: 135173     median: 139365 (50%)     max: 140166 Points
102716 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 855 +
min: 376698     avg: 428445     median: 432658 (42%)     max: 451559 Points
329860 Points (32%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
215665 Points (28%)
min: 197214     avg: 236383     median: 246456 (32%)     max: 265478 Points
min: 121702     avg: 154312     median: 154312 (20%)     max: 186922 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5864 Points (31%)
min: 5121     avg: 6872     median: 6326.5 (33%)     max: 12391 Points
min: 2385     avg: 2407     median: 2407 (13%)     max: 2429 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22707 Points (49%)
min: 5578     avg: 11793     median: 11067 (24%)     max: 18491 Points
min: 5088     avg: 5342     median: 5341.5 (11%)     max: 5595 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8801     avg: 8914     median: 8914 (58%)     max: 9027 Points
min: 5184     avg: 5411     median: 5305 (35%)     max: 5851 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 11011     avg: 11412     median: 11412 (57%)     max: 11813 Points
min: 5736     avg: 6022     median: 5891 (29%)     max: 6571 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 855 +
50.5 MB/s (37%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 855 +
304 MB/s (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 855 +
32.9 MB/s (40%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 855 +
1246 MB/s (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 855 +
27144 Points (43%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 855 +
8421 Points (39%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 90% n=30

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 70% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 05. 01:03:39

#0 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 11485 +0.016s ... 0.05s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 +0.016s ... 0.065s

#10 got single benchmarks 11011 +0.057s ... 0.123s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 +0.003s ... 0.126s

#12 got single benchmarks 9632 +0.015s ... 0.141s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.141s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.127s ... 0.268s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.274s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.169s ... 0.443s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.443s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)