Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Samsung Exynos 9609

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9609

The Samsung Exynos 9609 (or Exynos 7 Series 9609) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (big.LITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.2 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.6 GHz for power efficiency. Compared to the older Exynos 9610, the 9609 offers 100 MHz less clock speed for both clusters.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9609 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9609Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameExynos 7 SeriesKryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Samsung Exynos 9611 compare1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9610 compare1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9609 « 1.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1600 - 2200 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology10 nm11 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22441     avg: 22718     median: 22718 (19%)     max: 22995 Points
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2045     avg: 2171     median: 2170.5 (26%)     max: 2296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1979     avg: 2062     median: 2062 (24%)     max: 2145 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (9%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1601     avg: 1603     median: 1603 (16%)     max: 1605 Points
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5273     avg: 5324     median: 5324 (6%)     max: 5375 Points
4938 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1628 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5087 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5223 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1478 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5173 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1507 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1527 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2425 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10469 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5204 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6123 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4188     avg: 4202     median: 4202 (5%)     max: 4216 ms
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9807     avg: 9808     median: 9808 (9%)     max: 9809 Points
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 58     avg: 63     median: 63 (13%)     max: 68 Points
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 90285     avg: 99443     median: 99443 (34%)     max: 108601 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 10737     avg: 11106     median: 11105.5 (34%)     max: 11474 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 34447     avg: 36043     median: 36042.5 (44%)     max: 37638 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 39807     avg: 39885     median: 39884.5 (12%)     max: 39962 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 53992     avg: 57415     median: 57415 (35%)     max: 60838 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 139138     avg: 144448     median: 144448 (26%)     max: 149757 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
131830 Points (17%)
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3954     avg: 3972     median: 3972 (21%)     max: 3990 Points
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6578     avg: 6695     median: 6695 (44%)     max: 6812 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 8188     avg: 8545     median: 8545 (43%)     max: 8902 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9609 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 87% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 07:38:27

#0 checking url part for id 11407 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11407 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 11407 +0.012s ... 0.045s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.02s ... 0.065s

#9 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.043s ... 0.108s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.108s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.21s ... 0.318s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.357s

#13 return log +0.089s ... 0.446s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)