Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Samsung Exynos 7904

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7904

The Samsung Exynos 7904 (also called Exynos 7 Series) is a upper mid-range system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched early 2019 and features two Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. Furthermore, there are six power efficient Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.6 GHz, an ARM Mali-G71 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR4x memory controller. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE Cat.12 3CA 600 Mbps download speeds and Cat.13 2CA 150 Mbps upload. 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 5.0 and FM Radio are also in the chip. Compared to the older and faster Exynos 7885, the 7904 offers a slower clocked A73 cores (1.8 versus 2.2 GHz).

It is manufactured in 14nm FinFET at Samsung and therefore a rather power efficient SoC.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 665

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (SM6125) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelSamsung Exynos 7904Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Kryo 260Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Samsung Exynos 78852.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7904 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7884B1.56 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1800 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology14 nm11 nm11 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G71 MP2, 2x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A53 (1.6 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory ControllerAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISPAdreno 610 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Specra 165 ISP
iGPUARM Mali-G71 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 7904
0.2 pt (16%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 665
0.5 pt (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12500 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12321     avg: 12706     median: 12747 (11%)     max: 13009 Points
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1657     avg: 1708     median: 1710 (20%)     max: 1755 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1677     avg: 1712     median: 1713 (20%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (10%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
239 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
596 Points (1%)
min: 1256     avg: 1356     median: 1371.5 (2%)     max: 1421 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
273 Points (1%)
115%
1 SD 665 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (1%)     max: 315 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1010 Points (3%)
137%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1327     avg: 1366     median: 1379 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1268     avg: 1306     median: 1320 (13%)     max: 1329 Points
1472 Points (15%)
min: 1495     avg: 1509     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1536 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4017     avg: 4073     median: 4096 (5%)     max: 4105 Points
4938 Points (6%)
min: 5134     avg: 5388     median: 5366 (6%)     max: 5663 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1247 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3702 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3799 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1263 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
598 Points (5%)
380%
1 SD 665 +
2272 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1860 Points (17%)
149%
1 SD 665 +
2767 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7368 Points (14%)
146%
1 SD 665 +
10733 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3613 Points (7%)
125%
1 SD 665 +
4516 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4275 Points (11%)
143%
1 SD 665 +
6117 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3703     avg: 4610     median: 4515.5 (5%)     max: 5707 ms
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
min: 4434     avg: 4783     median: 4562 (5%)     max: 6719 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7798     avg: 8407     median: 8372 (8%)     max: 9087 Points
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
min: 6133     avg: 8901     median: 9260 (8%)     max: 9671 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 43     avg: 50.8     median: 52 (11%)     max: 56 Points
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
min: 38     avg: 50.9     median: 51 (11%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 71303     avg: 73318     median: 73318 (25%)     max: 75333 Points
148%
1 SD 665 +
108166 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 2712     avg: 5838     median: 6029.5 (19%)     max: 8580 Points
171%
1 SD 665 +
10308 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 27074     avg: 30317     median: 31150.5 (38%)     max: 31891 Points
114%
1 SD 665 +
35460 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 21269     avg: 22734     median: 23138.5 (7%)     max: 23389 Points
134%
1 SD 665 +
31064 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 45380     avg: 46822     median: 46737 (29%)     max: 48432 Points
137%
1 SD 665 +
63801 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 101367     avg: 105710     median: 105782 (19%)     max: 109906 Points
133%
1 SD 665 +
140633 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
23506 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
27124 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
6105 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
49105 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105840 Points (10%)
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
min: 167305     avg: 171951     median: 169695 (16%)     max: 181432 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 131628     avg: 133094     median: 133094 (18%)     max: 134560 Points
16222 Points (2%)
172978 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
4.5 MB/s (3%)
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
13.4 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
72.8 MB/s (2%)
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
151 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
13.9 MB/s (17%)
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
11.3 MB/s (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
259.3 MB/s (7%)
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
256 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
4843 Points (8%)
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
7618 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
5089 Points (24%)
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
6505 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2527     avg: 2548     median: 2547.5 (13%)     max: 2568 Points
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
min: 3249     avg: 3328     median: 3328 (18%)     max: 3407 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 4371     avg: 5078     median: 5077.5 (11%)     max: 5784 Points
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
min: 9865     avg: 10707     median: 10707 (23%)     max: 11549 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5269     avg: 5372     median: 5372.5 (35%)     max: 5474 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5802     avg: 6452     median: 6542 (33%)     max: 6923 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
100%
1 SD 665 +
3.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt
101%
1 SD 665 +
1.2 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7904 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 163% n=26

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 → 160% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 07. 19:28:27

#0 checking url part for id 11376 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11487 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11376 +0.013s ... 0.037s

#8 got single benchmarks 11376 +0.015s ... 0.051s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.013s ... 0.064s

#10 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.038s ... 0.102s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11487 +0.014s ... 0.116s

#12 got single benchmarks 11487 +0.039s ... 0.155s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.155s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.263s ... 0.418s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.418s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)