Notebookcheck Logo

Does Redmi Note 17 Pro's performance problem become a dealbreaker in our gaming test?

Xiaomi Note 17 Pro 5G in review
ⓘ Notebookcheck (Marcus Herbrich)
Xiaomi Note 17 Pro 5G in review
The new Redmi Note 17 Pro shows surprising performance weaknesses with its Snapdragon chipset in our review, sometimes even falling behind its predecessor. Our gaming test with three games examines whether the weak Adreno 710 GPU holds this affordable Android phone back in current Android games.

Our Redmi Note 17 Pro review reveals a controversial weakness. The built-in Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 is slower than its direct predecessor in some of our benchmarks. The Note 15 Pro with its Mediatek Helio G200 performs better, particularly in graphics tests (prices currently start at around $340 at Amazon.com). 

Is this substantial performance deficit of the Adreno 710 also noticeable in everyday use with current Android games? We take a closer look at the gaming capabilities of Xiaomi's current mid-range phone using three games from the Play Store.

Redmi Note 17 Pro gaming test

05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.5 (51-61) fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø31.9 (18-34) fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smoothest: Ø58.3 (35-61) fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smoothest: Ø117.9 (100-121) fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø58.6 (32-61) fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø89.1 (84-91) fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (36-41) fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø59.7 (57-61) fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 6s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Dead Trigger 2: Ø88.5 (59-105) fps
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Dead Trigger 2: Ø112.5 (99-121) fps

The affordable Xiaomi phone is a disappointment for gamers

What matters for a good gaming experience is not graphics benchmark scores, but a high and stable frame rate in games with a high level of detail. And here, the Note 17 Pro does not perform particularly well, especially compared with its sibling, the Poco X8 Pro. 

In our review, PUBG Mobile can be played at a peak frame rate of just 60 fps at both low detail settings and medium graphics settings (HD setting). HFR gaming beyond 100 fps is not possible with the Redmi phone. At the high detail setting (UHD), it delivers just under 40 fps. However, the particularly pronounced frame drops do not bode well for the future. 

This impression persists even in the older Dead Trigger 2. Although the Xiaomi phone briefly peaks at over 100 fps here, we also measure a sharp drop in frame rate, which is rather unusual for this Android shooter in the mid-range smartphone segment. 

In genuinely demanding games such as Genshin Impact, the Redmi Note 17 delivers a solid frame rate. However, it does not come close to reaching the full potential of the fantasy action RPG on Android (60 fps). At minimum detail settings, we measure an average of around 32 fps. At this frame rate, though, gaming is not particularly enjoyable.

Xiaomi Note 17 Pro 5G in review

Source(s)

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
> Expert reviews and news on laptops, smartphones and tech innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2026 10 > Does Redmi Note 17 Pro's performance problem become a dealbreaker in our gaming test?
Marcus Herbrich, 2026-10- 8 (Update: 2026-10- 7)