Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820

MediaTek Dimensity 720

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 720

The Mediatek Dimensity 720 is a mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores, all clocked at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 3 core ARM Mali-G57 MC3 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU) and video de- and encoding. Compared to the faster Dimensity 820, the CPU cores are lower clocked and the GPU offers less cores. Furthermore, all other features were slightly restricted (e.g. max. 12 GB RAM).

The Dimensity 720 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

MediaTek Dimensity 820

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 820

The Mediatek Dimensity 820 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.6 GHz and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 5 core ARM Mali-G57 MC5 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding. The Dimensity 820 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

show full text
ModelMediaTek Dimensity 720MediaTek Dimensity 820
SeriesMediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8202 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 7202 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 8202 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7202 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock2000 MHz2000 - 2600 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm
Features4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G57 MC3, APU 3.0, 5G Modem, MiraVision (4K30 Video, 64MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 12GB LPDDR4x Support4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2.6 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G57 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP3ARM Mali-G57 MP5
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMediatek Dimensity 720Mediatek Dimensity 820

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 720
30.2 pt (51%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -65%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 -13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 -13%
Mediatek Helio G88 -9%
UNISOC T610 -9%
Mediatek Helio P70 -8%
Mediatek Helio G85 -5%
UNISOC Tangula T700 -3%
Mediatek Helio G80 -3%
Mediatek Helio P90 -3%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
Mediatek Helio G70 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 10%
MediaTek Dimensity 700 13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 15%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 94%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 820
44.5 pt (76%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -76%
...
Mediatek Helio G90T -17%
MediaTek Dimensity 810 -17%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G -16%
MediaTek Dimensity 800U -15%
Samsung Exynos 9820 -14%
HiSilicon Kirin 980 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G -2%
HiSilicon Kirin 820 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 -1%
MediaTek Dimensity 820
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus 5%
HiSilicon Kirin 990 6%
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ 7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 7%
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 8%
Samsung Exynos 990 9%
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G 10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 22%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 32%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13664 Points (12%)
32166 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2901     avg: 3042     median: 3037 (38%)     max: 3189 Points
3969 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3014     avg: 3045     median: 3018 (44%)     max: 3102 Points
4169 Points (61%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1536 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1889 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
13894 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6935 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7836 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2363 Points (27%)
3022 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6182 Points (8%)
10658 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 472     avg: 499.7     median: 511 (25%)     max: 516 Points
652 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1511     avg: 1592     median: 1627 (6%)     max: 1638 Points
2678 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2475     avg: 3334     median: 3467 (4%)     max: 4059 ms
3032 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14156     avg: 15560     median: 14886 (15%)     max: 17637 Points
18974 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 49     avg: 52.3     median: 51 (13%)     max: 57 Points
65 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 47476     avg: 52873     median: 52872.5 (44%)     max: 58269 Points
79672 Points (67%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 42094     avg: 51085     median: 51084.5 (41%)     max: 60075 Points
68754 Points (55%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 60295     avg: 63084     median: 63084 (12%)     max: 65873 Points
123943 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 84462     avg: 85620     median: 85619.5 (31%)     max: 86777 Points
129050 Points (47%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 252308     avg: 252661     median: 252660 (24%)     max: 253013 Points
401419 Points (39%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
176204 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
14932 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
8694 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2711     avg: 2821     median: 2820.5 (15%)     max: 2930 Points
10459 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 13793     avg: 14162     median: 14161.5 (30%)     max: 14530 Points
25698 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6145     avg: 6770     median: 6770 (44%)     max: 7395 Points
11263 Points (74%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7158     avg: 8916     median: 8915.5 (45%)     max: 10673 Points
16302 Points (82%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.5 Watt (11%)
00.20.50.70.91.21.41.71.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.34.5Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
0.9 Watt (3%)
00.10.10.20.20.30.40.40.50.50.60.70.70.80.80.9111.11.1Tooltip

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 720 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 820 → 166% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 30. 14:55:23

#0 checking url part for id 12994 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12753 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.052s ... 0.058s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.06s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.061s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.061s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.065s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 12994 +0.001s ... 0.066s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#20 got single benchmarks 12994 +0.009s ... 0.075s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.077s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.079s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 12753 +0s ... 0.079s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#28 got single benchmarks 12753 +0.006s ... 0.085s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.097s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.098s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.101s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.11s

#102 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.113s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#104 return log +0.004s ... 0.117s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)