Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

Intel Celeron N5105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5105

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive desktops and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5105 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N5105 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1005G1 and the Ryzen 3 3250U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (mobile and lower clocked N5100 6W). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.1 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is based on the 45nm Penryn core, but Trusted Execution and Virtualization (VT-x) are disabled.

The P7450 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

ModelIntel Celeron N5105Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
CodenameJasper LakePenryn
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Core 2 Duo
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 « 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2130 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB3 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP10 Watt25 Watt
Technology10 nm45 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1338PGA478
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (450 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB1066
Transistors410 Million
Voltage1.05-1.15V V
Die Size107 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5105
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2175 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
618 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
235 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
826 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
368 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
108.1 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 2242     avg: 2389     median: 2305.5 (14%)     max: 2575 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 4121     avg: 4473     median: 4373 (3%)     max: 4863 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1230     avg: 1237     median: 1239 (15%)     max: 1243 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 35.9     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (8%)     max: 39 s
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
11153 MIPS (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3108 MIPS (37%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2940 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1573 Seconds (11%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.2 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1845     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (4%)     max: 1938 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 22     avg: 23.5     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 54     avg: 55.7     median: 55.4 (2%)     max: 59.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1334     avg: 1338     median: 1337.5 (6%)     max: 1341 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 16477     avg: 18533     median: 19560 (9%)     max: 19563 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 14460     avg: 14811     median: 14700 (11%)     max: 15272 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 4809     avg: 5158     median: 5055 (10%)     max: 5712 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 P7450 +
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 3804     avg: 3918     median: 3918 (3%)     max: 4032 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4394 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3869 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5498 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1643 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
653 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2080 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
649 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2069 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1582 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
96.2 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
134.2 Points (24%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
531 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
22.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
16.2 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5105 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 06. 19:04:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 445 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751821451s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 445 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 445 +0.009s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.038s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)