Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core m3-8100Y

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095 and the N5095A is that the latter comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database is about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095 has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095 is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core m3-8100Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core m3-8100Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.1 - 3.4 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder.  Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core m3-7Y32), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the old 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095Intel Core m3-8100Y
CodenameJasper LakeAmber Lake-Y
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Amber Lake
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y compare1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y compare1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y « 1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1100 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
2 / 4
TDP15 Watt5 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
$281 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
20.6 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - m3-8100Y
19.5 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (26%)     max: 621 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (25%)     max: 239 Points
min: 232     avg: 257.7     median: 243 (26%)     max: 298 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
min: 382     avg: 440.7     median: 413 (1%)     max: 527 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
min: 157     avg: 190.8     median: 179.5 (1%)     max: 247 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (29%)     max: 109 Points
min: 91     avg: 101.3     median: 96.6 (27%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (30%)     max: 1.29 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
3850 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
6055 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (11%)     max: 17278 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
906 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
18.6 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
1646 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
min: 4937     avg: 6246     median: 6245.5 (4%)     max: 7554 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
min: 2683     avg: 2983     median: 2982.5 (35%)     max: 3282 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (1%)     max: 25.25 fps
11.2 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (3%)     max: 120.25 fps
58.3 fps (1%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
min: 1.42     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.96 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.5 GB/s (7%)
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2936 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
min: 1893     avg: 2206     median: 2206 (16%)     max: 2519 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
min: 0.942     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (23%)     max: 1.204 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20.5 s (4%)
11.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
45.7 s (2%)
29.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1039 s (5%)
818 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (11%)     max: 4439 Points
min: 2165     avg: 2747     median: 2579.5 (6%)     max: 3665 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
min: 24135     avg: 26883     median: 26882.5 (22%)     max: 29630 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
min: 20632     avg: 22076     median: 22076 (18%)     max: 23520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (38%)     max: 48186 Points
min: 18736     avg: 26552     median: 26177 (21%)     max: 34742 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
min: 1941     avg: 2084     median: 1968 (5%)     max: 2460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
min: 2692     avg: 2986     median: 2837.5 (5%)     max: 3577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
min: 943     avg: 1061     median: 992 (4%)     max: 1248 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
520 Points (13%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1529 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (25%)     max: 659 Points
min: 809     avg: 846     median: 845.5 (33%)     max: 882 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
min: 1178     avg: 1397     median: 1396.5 (3%)     max: 1615 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
765 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
1279 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
4159 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (8%)     max: 7968 Points
6934 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4043 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6676 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5446 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2702 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5958 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3081 Points (46%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8823 Points (47%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6189 Points (43%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5047 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6364 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6113 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
min: 1295     avg: 1652     median: 1715 (2%)     max: 2163 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 117.4     avg: 211     median: 211 (2%)     max: 304.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14701     avg: 21429     median: 20267 (15%)     max: 29318 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (26%)     max: 96.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (22%)     max: 127.2 Points
min: 128     avg: 134.5     median: 135.5 (24%)     max: 139 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5961 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
25599 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9760 Points (64%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13598 Points (68%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (18%)     max: 495 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core m3-8100Y → 85% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 26. 20:14:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10086 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758910491s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:17:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10086 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 10086 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.076s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.079s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)