Notebookcheck Logo

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo in review: Dual-screen laptop with a fast 120 Hz OLED display

Two screens and a fast CPU. Asus has retained the dual-screen concept with the new Zenbook Pro 14 Duo that features a fast 120 Hz OLED display and a new Alder Lake H processor from Intel. Optionally, there are also models with dedicated GeForce RTX graphics cards, but our test device only comes with the integrated GPU.

With the new Zenbook Pro 14 Duo, Asus introduces a powerful multimedia laptop with two screens. We're already familiar with the basic concept from the old ZenBook Duo 14 UX482, but the new Pro 14 Duo features some important changes, and overall, users can particularly look forward to more performance. While the predecessor was still equipped with Intel Tiger Lake U processors, Asus is now using the much faster H45 CPUs from the new Alder Lake generation. A dedicated Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti is also optionally available. The main display is a 14.5-inch 4K OLED screen, and the second screen uses an IPS panel; they both run at a fast 120 Hz.

Our review unit bears the UX8402Z model designation and uses the Core i7-12700H in combination with 16 GB of LPDDR5 RAM and a 512 GB PCIe 4.0 SSD. However, our device has to do without the dedicated GeForce GPU; graphics computations are exclusively handled by the processor's integrated Iris Xe Graphics G7. Our configuration costs around 1,899 Euros (~$2,033), while the model with the RTX 3050 Ti and a 1 TB SSD costs 2,299 Euros (~$2,462).

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1400 MHz, Memory: 2400 MHz
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR5, dual-channel, onboard
Display
14.50 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 234 PPI, capacitive, ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB 
, 430 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.6 x 323.5 x 224.7 ( = 0.77 x 12.74 x 8.85 in)
Battery
76 Wh, 4770 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 150-watt PSU, MyAsus, ProArt Creator Hub, ScreenXpert, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.736 kg ( = 61.24 oz / 3.83 pounds), Power Supply: 420 g ( = 14.82 oz / 0.93 pounds)
Price
1,900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.4 %
06/2022
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg19.6 mm14.50"2880x1800
89 %
03/2022
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.8 kg19 mm14.40"2400x1600
92.7 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964
90.6 %
05/2022
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg15.25 mm14.00"3840x2400
85.1 %
01/2021
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1080

Case - Zenbook with new hinge mechanism

Compared to the Zenbook Duo 14, Asus has completely redesigned both the case and the hinge mechanism that lifts the second screen. This is a full metal case in the Tech Black color variant, and the entire case design is quite discreet overall. The display lid features the subtle new Asus logo, and the concentric circle pattern is still present, but you have to look closely in order to notice it. According to Asus, there's also an anti-dirt coating, but you should still wipe the lid from time to time. 

The new hinge mechanism leaves an overall stable impression. As soon as you open the lid, the secondary display is raised as well. Although the two support struts look quite fragile, they do their job quite well. The main display itself is attached to the ScreenPad with two hinges and not directly to the base unit. This helps Asus ensure that there is always a clean transition between the two screens, but the stability of the hinges is not satisfactory, since the main screen wobbles visibly when you change the opening angle (max. ~145-150 degrees). The screen lid itself is very stable, though, and even localized pressure doesn't lead to image distortions. This also applies to the base unit, and the keyboard doesn't flex when typing, either.

When it comes to the footprint, our comparison devices hardly differ, but the additional screen also affects the build height and the weight. However, there are no major differences here, either. You still have to take the 420-gram power adapter into account when transporting the device.

Size comparison

323.5 mm / 12.7 inch 224.7 mm / 8.85 inch 19.6 mm / 0.772 inch 1.7 kg3.83 lbs323 mm / 12.7 inch 228 mm / 8.98 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 1.8 kg4.04 lbs324 mm / 12.8 inch 222 mm / 8.74 inch 16.9 mm / 0.665 inch 1.6 kg3.48 lbs318 mm / 12.5 inch 230 mm / 9.06 inch 15.25 mm / 0.6 inch 1.4 kg3.15 lbs312.6 mm / 12.3 inch 221.2 mm / 8.71 inch 15.5 mm / 0.61 inch 1.6 kg3.53 lbs

Connectivity - Zenbook with Thunderbolt and USB-A

The Zenbook Pro 14 Duo's ports are distributed across both sides as well as the back. The USB ports are all located on the right and also quite in the middle, which isn't ideal in every situation. The proprietary power connector, the microSD reader, and the HDMI output are on the back. Since the screen is also raised a bit when opening the device due to the special mechanism, the ports on the back always remain accessible.

The iGPU version allows connecting a maximum of three external monitors, but only when the Zenbook's second screen is disabled. Using both of the built-in screens limits the number of external displays to two.

Right: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C 4.0, DisplayPort ALT mode 1.4a, Power Delivery), USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2
Right: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C 4.0, DisplayPort ALT mode 1.4a, Power Delivery), USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2
Left: 3.5 mm stereo audio jack
Left: 3.5 mm stereo audio jack
Back: HDMI 2.1, microSD reader, power supply
Back: HDMI 2.1, microSD reader, power supply

SD card reader

The microSD card reader on the back uses a spring mechanism and is able to fully accommodate the memory card. With our reference card (Angelbird AV Pro V60), we determine average transfer rates of around 80 MB/s, which is a substantial increase compared to the old model.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core (AV PRO V60)
122 MB/s ∼100% +55%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 226, n=61, last 2 years)
79.2 MB/s ∼65% +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
78.6 MB/s ∼64%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
24.94 MB/s ∼20% -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 257, n=58, last 2 years)
88.8 MB/s ∼100% +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
81.9 MB/s ∼92%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
27.2 MB/s ∼31% -67%

Communication

Users will have to do without an Ethernet module (but this can be achieved via TB4 adapters), but in return, Intel's built-in AX211E is one of the most modern WLAN modules. We were able to connect to the 6 GHz network (Wi-Fi 6E) provided by our reference router from Asus (GT-AXE11000) without any issues, and the transfer rates of over 1.6 GHz were very high and also very stable. The connection to more common Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 5 networks didn't show any irregularities, either.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1446 (662min - 1538max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1003 - 1501, n=5)
1274 MBit/s ∼88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (277 - 1497, n=70, last 2 years)
1056 MBit/s ∼73%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1030 (684min - 1188max) MBit/s ∼71%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
689 (349min - 730max) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1449 (1384min - 1511max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1178 - 1623, n=5)
1429 MBit/s ∼99%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1293 (1024min - 1492max) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (137 - 1684, n=70, last 2 years)
1151 MBit/s ∼79%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
730 (645min - 824max) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1665 (1628min - 1691max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (1137 - 1857, n=24)
1529 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 1771, n=7, last 2 years)
1474 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1467 (1440min - 1493max) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1613 (1478min - 1688max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1601 (1502min - 1664max) MBit/s ∼99%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (944 - 1851, n=24)
1415 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (944 - 1822, n=7, last 2 years)
1336 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1601 (1502-1664)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1628-1691)
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1448 (1384-1511)
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1030 (684-1188)

Webcam

Asus still uses a 720p webcam in the top bezel of the screen. The camera does its job, but the pictures aren't especially sharp, and things could have certainly been better here.

ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA: 15.96 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 27.13 ∆E

Maintenance

The bottom case cover is secured with several Torx screws (T5), and it can be removed. However, maintenance is limited to cleaning the fans and the M.2 2280 SSD, which can be replaced.

View of the interior
View of the interior

Input devices - Zenbook without palm rest

Keyboard

Because of the additional display, the keyboard has been moved completely to the front, which is why there's no palm rest at all. If you have enough space (for example on a desk) this can work, but if that's not the case it quickly becomes uncomfortable. Furthermore, the keys on the right side are a bit cramped (only a single-line Enter key), and especially the arrow keys are extremely small. This is a pity, because the keyboard itself provides a very comfortable typing experience, and with its key travel of 1.4 mm, it's definitely suitable for longer typing sessions. The white backlight can be adjusted in three levels, and it can also be activated/deactivated automatically via the ambient light sensor, which works well and is just very practical.

Input devices
Input devices
Keyboard backlight
Keyboard backlight

Touchpad and touchscreen

The touchpad has moved to the right of the keyboard, and it requires some compromises in portrait mode. The gliding properties are very good, and all our inputs were implemented smoothly. However, the small surface (5.3 x 7.8 cm) often forces you to reposition your finger, even for simple pointer movements. Furthermore, gestures involving more than two fingers are very difficult due to the limited space alone. Two dedicated mouse buttons are located underneath the touchpad (no ClickPad), which have a comparatively long travel and don't make such a loud clicking sound.

Of course, the two capacitive touchscreens are also available for input, and we have no criticism whatsoever here, as they work very well. According to Asus, stylus input is also supported, but our review sample didn't come with one.

Display - Zenbook with a 120 Hz OLED display

Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED subpixel grid
Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED subpixel grid

First of all, we'll take a look at the main display, for which Asus has chosen a 14.5-inch 2.8K OLED panel. There are 2,880x1,800 pixels (234 DPI) spread across the 16:10 panel, and the subjective image quality is excellent. Images and content look very vivid and detailed, and the image impression during movements also benefits from the high refresh rate (120 Hz), which you first have to activate manually, though.

Asus specifies a brightness of up to 550 cd/m² (which can also be adjusted automatically via the sensor), but you have to differentiate between SDR and HDR content here. In normal use, the maximum brightness is "only" around 360 cd/m². That doesn't sound like a lot, but the extremely high contrast of the OLED panel somewhat compensates for that. As soon as you enable HDR in the settings and watch the right content, you can also enjoy brightness values of up to 580 cd/m², which we were able to measure on a small white screen section. Around 460 cd/m² is still possible with an almost completely white image. These rates are on par with most OLED panels currently found in laptops. However, users who often work with HDR content should take a look at the MacBook Pro 14, which has a mini-LED panel that automatically detects HDR content and achieves brightness values of more than 1,500 cd/m² as a result. As with Apple, the Zenbook's color temperature can also be automatically adjusted to the ambient light via a sensor. There's no screen bleeding in OLED displays.

359
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA45AF01-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 359 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 357.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: 17800:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.5
97.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
ATNA45AF01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.40
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
LEN140WQUXGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 14.00
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
-13%
-1%
0%
-20%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
80.6
-19%
99.3
-1%
98.7
-1%
69
-31%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.9
0%
99.8
0%
99.1
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97.4
78.5
-19%
98.5
1%
71
-27%
Response Times
-417%
728%
-11%
-2034%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
58.4 ?(26.8, 31.6)
-2333%
58.4 ?(27.6, 30.8)
-2333%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
-17%
56.4 ?(30, 26.4)
-2250%
Response Time Black / White *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
24 ?(8.4, 15.6)
-900%
40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6)
-1583%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
-17%
46 ?(24.4, 21.6)
-1817%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(100)
5000 ?(98)
1983%
14880
6100%
239.2 ?(50)
0%
Screen
-134%
60%
250%
-139%
Brightness middle
356
497
40%
489
37%
361
1%
361.8
2%
Brightness
357
491
38%
479
34%
362
1%
351
-2%
Brightness Distribution
99
92
-7%
94
-5%
98
-1%
90
-9%
Black Level *
0.02
0.29
-1350%
0.01
50%
0.001
95%
0.28
-1300%
Contrast
17800
1714
-90%
48900
175%
361000
1928%
1292
-93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
1.2
54%
0.8
69%
2.8
-8%
1.44
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.5
2.8
38%
1.3
71%
5.8
-29%
3.3
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2
0.8
60%
1.24
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.9
14%
1.1
50%
1.9
14%
1.3
41%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.14 103%
2.24 98%
2.16 102%
2.15 102%
CCT
6246 104%
6821 95%
6181 105%
6411 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64.9
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.3
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-188% / -166%
262% / 222%
80% / 141%
-731% / -384%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN grayscales (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN grayscales (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN saturation (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN saturation (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN ColorChecker (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN ColorChecker (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN grayscales calibrated (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN grayscales calibrated (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN saturation calibrated (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN saturation calibrated (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated (DCI-P3 target color space)
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated (DCI-P3 target color space)

We analyzed the panel with the professional CalMAN software (X-Rite i1 Pro 2) and used the Native preset in the MyAsus app (also corresponds to the Display P3 profile), but you can alternatively switch to sRGB. Out of the box, performance is already very good, and only a few isolated colors are above the important DeltaE 2000 deviation of 3 (compared to the DCI-P3 reference). With our own calibration (profile is available for free download above), we can improve the reproduction quality even further. Only at 100% red does the slightly elevated deviation remain. Nevertheless, the Zenbook Pro 14 Duo is suitable for image editing, and the P3 color space is also fully covered.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19928 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

We have to discuss the subject of PWM in OLED displays a bit more in detail. In principle, we can determine a flickering of 240 Hz in all brightness values. However, the so-called DC dimming is used in the range of 100% - 60% brightness, which is much less problematic for the eyes. As soon as the brightness drops below 60%, Asus recommends that the user takes a break in case of eye strain. However, the manufacturer also offers another alternative in the MyAsus app, which the manufacturer calls "flicker-free OLED dimming". The OLED's dimming level can be adjusted gradually there (power consumption remains the same, though), and DC dimming is still used. This makes a lot of sense, and it's a good alternative for users who are sensitive to OLED flickering in particular.

100% brightness
100% brightness
80% brightness
80% brightness
60% brightness
60% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
40% brightness
40% brightness
20% brightness
20% brightness
0% brightness
0% brightness

Naturally, the glossy OLED touchscreen has issues with reflections in outdoor use. However, the high contrast still helps, and as long as you can avoid direct light sources/reflections, you should still be able to see the screen content properly. The OLED display's viewing-angle stability remains unimpaired as well, but from certain angles, you'll get the familiar slight bluish tint.

In sunlight
In sunlight
In sunlight
In sunlight
Viewing-angle stability
Viewing-angle stability

ScreenPad Plus - Matte IPS panel running at 120 Hz

The picture of the subpixel grid shows the extremely grainy display.
The picture of the subpixel grid shows the extremely grainy display.

Now we'll take a look at the additional display above the keyboard. This is a matte IPS touchscreen with a resolution of 2,880x864 pixels. Subjectively, though, the image quality is extremely poor and reminiscent of matte touchscreens from 10 years ago. We haven't seen such a grainy display (see also the subpixel picture) for a long time. Using the second display (there's a button for dragging windows, but you can also simply drag windows to the second display with the mouse) works quite well apart from some scaling issues (window size is always changed), and we can see how the second display can really make sense depending on the workflow, but it's not exactly enjoyable to use due to the grainy image impression.

That's a shame, because it's actually a pretty good display without PWM, with fast response times (120 Hz as well), and even a decent performance in our CalMAN analysis. With a maximum of 600 cd/m², the second display even gets a bit brighter than the OLED display in HDR mode.

585
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 605 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 566 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 605 cd/m²
Contrast: 1315:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.5
Gamma: 2.2
ScreenPad CalMAN grayscales (DCI-P3 target color space)
ScreenPad CalMAN grayscales (DCI-P3 target color space)
ScreenPad CalMAN saturation (DCI-P3 target color space)
ScreenPad CalMAN saturation (DCI-P3 target color space)
ScreenPad CalMAN ColorChecker (DCI-P3 target color space)
ScreenPad CalMAN ColorChecker (DCI-P3 target color space)
vs. DCI-P3 (CalMAN 2D intersection)
vs. DCI-P3 (CalMAN 2D intersection)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19928 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Performance - Asus opts for 45-watt CPUs from Intel

 
 

Test conditions

There are three different power settings in the MyAsus app: Whisper Mode, Standard, and Performance, where Performance is only available when plugged in. The modes affect both the performance as well as the fan volume. We have listed the TDP values corresponding to each of the three modes in the table below:

MyAsus Mode PL2 PL1 Max. fan volume
Whisper Mode 60 watts 35 watts 29.2 dB(A)
Standard Mode 80 watts 60 -> 55 watts 41.7 dB(A)
Performance Mode 80 watts 70 -> 62 watts 48.8 dB(A)

Performance Mode only affects the CPU's multi-core performance. However, the advantage over Standard Mode isn't huge, and the fans get significantly louder, which is why we also primarily performed our measurements and benchmarks using the Standard preset (Asus recommended Energy Profile, Windows Performance Mode: Best Performance). This behavior might differ in configurations with the dedicated RTX 3050 Ti.

Processor - Core i7-12700H

The Intel Core i7-12700H is part of the latest Alder Lake H45 generation, and it's based on a hybrid architecture of 6 fast performance cores (max. 4.7 GHz) and 8 efficiency cores (up to 3.5 GHz). Technically, this is a 45-watt processor, but we have seen in other tests that the Core i7 can consume over 120 watts under load. With the power limits of 80/60 watts, the Zenbook Pro 14 Duo is still in good shape, and it achieves consistently good benchmark results. Especially compared to the old Zenbook 14 Duo with its ULV processor, performance has been significantly increased.

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

012024036048060072084096010801200132014401560168018001920204021602280Tooltip
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2250 (2201.55-2389.34)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø2111 (2031.08-2355.57)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø947 (936.68-1007.91)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1634 (1600.9-1805.05)
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø907 (901.51-936.79)

We noticed an interesting (reproducible) behavior in the Cinebench loop in Standard Mode, where performance briefly drops a bit after the first run until the fans kick in. In Performance Mode, the multi-core performance is about 7% higher, but the fans also get significantly louder here.

The processor can consume a maximum of 46 watts on battery power. This has no impact on single-core performance, but multi-core performance is about 23% lower. Additional CPU benchmarks are available here.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop (green: Standard, red: Performance)
Cinebench R15 Multi loop (green: Standard, red: Performance)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
88.6 pt ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
88.4 pt ∼88%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -8!
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
76.7 pt ∼77%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
75.5 pt ∼76%
Average of class Multimedia
 
59.9 pt ∼60%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
55.4 pt ∼55%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA -2!
Intel Core i7-1165G7
41.6 pt ∼42%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19250, n=37)
15602 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
15101 Points ∼97%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
10735 Points ∼69% -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points ∼61% -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 18444, n=98, last 2 years)
8515 Points ∼55% -44%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
6495 Points ∼42% -57%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5827 (1104.73min - 5827.22max) Points ∼37% -61%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
1807 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1793 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1825, n=36)
1757 Points ∼97% -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points ∼85% -15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1497 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (819 - 1940, n=92, last 2 years)
1425 Points ∼79% -21%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1345 Points ∼74% -26%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7382, n=37)
5901 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
5797 Points ∼98%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
4048 Points ∼69% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (961 - 7040, n=106, last 2 years)
3087 Points ∼52% -47%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
2526 Points ∼43% -56%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2264 Points ∼38% -61%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 702, n=37)
675 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
657 Points ∼94% -6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
578 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
571 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (316 - 739, n=106, last 2 years)
536 Points ∼77% -23%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2903, n=42)
2517 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
2389.34 (2201.55min - 2389.24max) Points ∼95%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
2355.57 (2031.08min - 2355.57max) Points ∼94% -1%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1805 (1600.9min - 1805.05max) Points ∼72% -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (385 - 2894, n=121, last 2 years)
1395 Points ∼55% -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points ∼52% -45%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1008 (936.68min - 1007.91max) Points ∼40% -58%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
937 (901.51min - 936.79max) Points ∼37% -61%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
259 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=38)
253 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
243 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
226.7 Points ∼88% -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
223 Points ∼86% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 279, n=102, last 2 years)
210 Points ∼81% -19%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
521 Seconds * ∼100% -135%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
491 Seconds * ∼94% -121%
Average of class Multimedia
  (183.3 - 1188, n=104, last 2 years)
446 Seconds * ∼86% -101%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
300 Seconds * ∼58% -35%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (171 - 732, n=36)
229 Seconds * ∼44% -3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
222 Seconds * ∼43%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
61571 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=36)
60235 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
45227 MIPS ∼73% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11122 - 72912, n=103, last 2 years)
35542 MIPS ∼58% -42%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
26809 MIPS ∼44% -56%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25923 MIPS ∼42% -58%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
5673 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5863, n=36)
5605 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5214 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
5204 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2898 - 6186, n=103, last 2 years)
5106 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
5104 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
12345 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=37)
11752 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
10321 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2427 - 14376, n=104, last 2 years)
6931 Points ∼56% -44%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
5701 Points ∼46% -54%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
1771 Points ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1764 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=37)
1728 Points ∼98% -2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1551 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (843 - 1887, n=104, last 2 years)
1451 Points ∼82% -18%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.4, n=38)
16.7 fps ∼100% +10%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
15.2 fps ∼91%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
12.4 fps ∼74% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 21, n=103, last 2 years)
9.64 fps ∼58% -37%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
7.93 fps ∼47% -48%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1.39 fps ∼8% -91%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
88.1 s * ∼100% -95%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
54.6 s * ∼62% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30.2 - 99.2, n=101, last 2 years)
52.4 s * ∼59% -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
47.9 s * ∼54% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 92, n=36)
45.5 s * ∼52% -1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
45.1 s * ∼51%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1.002 sec * ∼100% -119%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.596 sec * ∼59% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4155 - 1.002, n=104, last 2 years)
0.587 sec * ∼59% -28%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.4993 sec * ∼50% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=36)
0.4755 sec * ∼47% -4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4583 sec * ∼46%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2389.34 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
125.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
259 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
96.1 pt ∼96%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
86.4 pt ∼86%
Average of class Multimedia
 
82.5 pt ∼83%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65.5 pt ∼66%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52.5 pt ∼53%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Multimedia
  (2677 - 15700, n=80, last 2 years)
8848 KRay/s ∼100% +25%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 15078, n=36)
8734 KRay/s ∼99% +24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7269 KRay/s ∼82% +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7071 KRay/s ∼80%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5393 KRay/s ∼61% -24%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Multimedia
  (12762 - 98165, n=80, last 2 years)
45346 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 75435, n=36)
41016 Points ∼90% +18%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
34831 Points ∼77%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31471 Points ∼69% -10%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
21811 Points ∼48% -37%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 3791, n=36)
2876 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2529 MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Multimedia
  (841 - 4254, n=80, last 2 years)
2238 MB/s ∼78% -12%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2076 MB/s ∼72% -18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2059 MB/s ∼72% -19%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
99205 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 102833, n=36)
96788 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31314 - 107161, n=80, last 2 years)
71389 Points ∼72% -28%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
47895 Points ∼48% -52%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42571 Points ∼43% -57%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9928, n=36)
9034 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8690 Points ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 12638, n=80, last 2 years)
7401 Points ∼82% -15%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5524 Points ∼61% -36%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4567 Points ∼51% -47%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Multimedia
  (7417 - 54148, n=80, last 2 years)
24864 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 37158, n=36)
23574 Points ∼95% +16%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20299 Points ∼82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
18322 Points ∼74% -10%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11520 Points ∼46% -43%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 136241, n=36)
78177 MB/s ∼100% +49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13739 - 147249, n=80, last 2 years)
63823 MB/s ∼82% +21%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52590 MB/s ∼67%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44267 MB/s ∼57% -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20435 MB/s ∼26% -61%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=36)
968 MB/s ∼100% +9%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
890 MB/s ∼92%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
660 MB/s ∼68% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (228 - 1193, n=87, last 2 years)
533 MB/s ∼55% -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
325 MB/s ∼34% -63%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 7989, n=36)
4976 KRay/s ∼100% +21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1501 - 8371, n=81, last 2 years)
4816 KRay/s ∼97% +17%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4108 KRay/s ∼83%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3897 KRay/s ∼78% -5%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2981 KRay/s ∼60% -27%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
41420 MPixel/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37512 MPixel/s ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 46643, n=36)
32805 MPixel/s ∼79% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8034 - 45694, n=81, last 2 years)
24713 MPixel/s ∼60% -40%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
16079 MPixel/s ∼39% -61%

System performance

Despite the lack of a dedicated GeForce GPU, the Zenbook Pro 14 Duo performs very well in the synthetic productivity benchmarks (PCMark, CrossMark), which is also confirmed by our subjective impression. The Zenbook is extremely responsive in everyday use, and the system also handles the second display without issues.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5726 - 6281, n=5)
5978 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5948 Points ∼99%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5738 Points ∼96% -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
5538 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3580 - 8083, n=86, last 2 years)
5487 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
4957 Points ∼83% -17%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (10569 - 11699, n=5)
11246 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10990 Points ∼98%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10826 Points ∼96% -1%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
10299 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7715 - 11699, n=86, last 2 years)
9576 Points ∼85% -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
8715 Points ∼77% -21%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
8342 Points ∼100% +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5462 - 11186, n=86, last 2 years)
7803 Points ∼94% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (7024 - 8038, n=5)
7413 Points ∼89% +6%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7030 Points ∼84% 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7024 Points ∼84%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
6623 Points ∼79% -6%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7401 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (6667 - 7401, n=5)
6964 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6739 Points ∼91% -9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
6343 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2679 - 11777, n=86, last 2 years)
6136 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
4846 Points ∼65% -35%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1799 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1492 - 1907, n=5)
1732 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1685 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (970 - 2138, n=28, last 2 years)
1561 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1490 Points ∼83% -17%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1407 Points ∼78% -22%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1693 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1499 - 1832, n=5)
1677 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1604 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (921 - 2038, n=28, last 2 years)
1507 Points ∼89% -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1417 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1305 Points ∼77% -23%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2016 Points ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1915 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1507 - 2016, n=5)
1839 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1821 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (933 - 2210, n=28, last 2 years)
1694 Points ∼84% -16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1472 Points ∼73% -27%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (1384 - 1831, n=5)
1598 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1547 Points ∼97% +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1533 Points ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1012 - 2234, n=28, last 2 years)
1394 Points ∼87% -9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1202 Points ∼75% -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1044 Points ∼65% -32%
PCMark 10 Score
5948 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67871 MB/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
59479 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31252 - 77803, n=36)
54958 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 69828, n=81, last 2 years)
42245 MB/s ∼62% -38%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67758 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (32677 - 76185, n=36)
58313 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57407 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22183 - 70337, n=80, last 2 years)
45773 MB/s ∼68% -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
61263 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58160 MB/s ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (30592 - 66475, n=36)
54983 MB/s ∼90% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21133 - 66799, n=80, last 2 years)
44639 MB/s ∼73% -23%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
101 ns * ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (76.2 - 132.1, n=87, last 2 years)
77.5 ns * ∼77%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 122, n=37)
62.2 (76.2min - 122max) ns * ∼62%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
0 ns * ∼0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
0 ns * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency test, the Zenbook doesn't show any major problems using the current BIOS version, and there are no skipped frames (dropped frames) when playing videos, but one driver causes a bit of trouble (ACPI driver).

LatencyMon - Overview
LatencyMon - Overview
LatencyMon - Drivers
LatencyMon - Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
959.5 μs * ∼100% -116%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
752 μs * ∼78% -69%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
453.1 μs * ∼47% -2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
444.1 μs * ∼46%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

Asus installs a fast PCIe 4.0 SSD from Samsung (PM9A1) with a storage capacity of 512 GB, of which about 430 GB is available after the first startup. The SSD performs slightly below expectations in the benchmarks, and slight performance drops can also be observed during continuous load. This doesn't have an impact in everyday use, but the Samsung SSD can't exploit its full potential. The reason for this is probably temperature issues because the drive is placed very close to the processor and the heat pipes inside the case. Further SSD benchmarks are available in our HDD/SSD Benchmarks article.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6799.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5038.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 438.12 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412.65 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 77.71 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 157.97 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 429.44 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1000.09 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
96.5 pt ∼97%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
 
78.2 pt ∼78%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
72.5 pt ∼73%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
55.6 pt ∼56%
Average of class Multimedia
 
48.5 pt ∼49%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
42.3 pt ∼42%
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4012 (3903.22min - 4012.48max) MB/s ∼100% +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3773 (3715.43min - 3772.78max) MB/s ∼94%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1472 - 4572, n=22)
3499 MB/s ∼87% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (816 - 4480, n=91, last 2 years)
2096 MB/s ∼52% -44%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1994 (1982.65min - 1994.18max) MB/s ∼50% -47%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1930 (1920.36min - 1930.22max) MB/s ∼48% -49%
seq write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4146 (4097.82min - 4146.07max) MB/s ∼100% +30%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1148 - 4434, n=22)
3396 MB/s ∼82% +7%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3187 (3096.33min - 3186.54max) MB/s ∼77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (240 - 4457, n=91, last 2 years)
2135 MB/s ∼51% -33%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1900 (1869.23min - 1900.47max) MB/s ∼46% -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1583 (1538.61min - 1582.72max) MB/s ∼38% -50%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6082 (5108.93min - 6082.16max) MB/s ∼100% +80%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (3387 - 6792, n=22)
5942 MB/s ∼98% +75%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
3547 (3020.99min - 3546.88max) MB/s ∼58% +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
3527 (3023.67min - 3526.78max) MB/s ∼58% +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3387 (2163.29min - 3386.84max) MB/s ∼56%
Average of class Multimedia
  (970 - 7028, n=90, last 2 years)
3374 MB/s ∼55% 0%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5061 (5034.21min - 5061.21max) MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4971 (4954.47min - 4971.21max) MB/s ∼98% -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1146 - 5091, n=22)
4475 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
3196 MB/s ∼63% -37%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2968 (2813.75min - 2968.31max) MB/s ∼59% -41%
Average of class Multimedia
  (241 - 5089, n=91, last 2 years)
2584 MB/s ∼51% -49%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
86.2 (82.58min - 86.23max) MB/s ∼100% +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
75.6 (75.08min - 75.62max) MB/s ∼88%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (37.6 - 92.9, n=22)
72.7 MB/s ∼84% -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
62.4 (61.86min - 62.42max) MB/s ∼72% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (27 - 93.8, n=91, last 2 years)
52.3 MB/s ∼61% -31%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
44.96 (44.77min - 44.96max) MB/s ∼52% -41%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
215 (210.55min - 214.96max) MB/s ∼100% +32%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (131 - 241, n=22)
188.2 MB/s ∼88% +16%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
162.8 (160.36min - 162.76max) MB/s ∼76%
Average of class Multimedia
  (74.3 - 373, n=91, last 2 years)
162.6 MB/s ∼76% 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
143 (140.1min - 143.21max) MB/s ∼67% -12%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
108.9 (88.06min - 108.92max) MB/s ∼51% -33%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3345 (3332.76min - 3344.97max) MB/s ∼100% +419%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (633 - 3423, n=22)
2322 MB/s ∼69% +261%
Average of class Multimedia
  (271 - 4178, n=91, last 2 years)
1276 MB/s ∼38% +98%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
794 (786.46min - 793.65max) MB/s ∼24% +23%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
731 (707.58min - 731.27max) MB/s ∼22% +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
644 (640.97min - 643.93max) MB/s ∼19%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2382 (1954.07min - 2382.29max) MB/s ∼100% +435%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (291 - 3567, n=22)
1699 MB/s ∼71% +282%
Average of class Multimedia
  (163 - 3612, n=91, last 2 years)
1135 MB/s ∼48% +155%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
445.8 (435.45min - 445.79max) MB/s ∼19% 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
445 (438.68min - 445.02max) MB/s ∼19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
403 (396.1min - 402.54max) MB/s ∼17% -9%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8167 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (3573 - 8620, n=22)
6330 Points ∼78% +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5549 Points ∼68%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
4206 Points ∼51% -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1284 - 9380, n=86, last 2 years)
4036 Points ∼49% -27%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
3446 Points ∼42% -38%
Score Read
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3045 Points ∼100% +101%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1214 - 3224, n=22)
2364 Points ∼78% +56%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1513 Points ∼50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (515 - 3634, n=86, last 2 years)
1489 Points ∼49% -2%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1306 Points ∼43% -14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1257 Points ∼41% -17%
Score Write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3626 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3368 Points ∼93%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1450 - 4036, n=22)
2793 Points ∼77% -17%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
2343 Points ∼65% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (283 - 3991, n=86, last 2 years)
1823 Points ∼50% -46%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
1497 Points ∼41% -56%
Seq Read
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 Duo OLED UX8402ZA
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5216 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5186 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (2629 - 5546, n=22)
4720 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
2768 MB/s ∼53% -47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1142 - 5588, n=86, last 2 years)
2742 MB/s ∼53% -47%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
2088 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Seq Write
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3838 MB/s ∼100% +43%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
  (1270 - 3920, n=22)
2940 MB/s ∼77% +10%