Notebookcheck Logo
Vivo iQOO 15 smartphone review

Android smartphone with spectacular hardware at a bargain price – Vivo iQOO 15 review

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for bargain hunters.

With the iQOO 15, Vivo offers a true flagship-level gaming smartphone at an attractive price. For under €600, buyers get fast charging, IP69 certification, and a large 7,000 mAh battery. An ultrasonic fingerprint sensor and a 1440p OLED panel are also rare features in this price class.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Louise Burke (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7

Verdict on the Vivo iQOO 15

With the iQOO 15, buyers get an outstanding overall package in the mid-range price segment and a device that delivers flagship-level performance at a significantly lower price.

Beyond the obvious high-end specifications such as the extra-bright 144 Hz OLED panel and the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the gaming smartphone also impresses on closer inspection. An excellent ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, strong battery endurance, and a high-quality vibration motor make everyday use genuinely enjoyable. The same applies to the premium chassis with its near-borderless design and a surprisingly good main camera.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

The high heat output and very pronounced SoC throttling are somewhat disappointing for a gaming phone that advertises "special cooling." Likewise, the rather weak speaker performance does not really suit a smartphone aimed at gamers.

Anyone who does not mind importing the Chinese version and accepting its drawbacks in Europe will not go wrong with this purchase.

Pros

+ premium chassis with IP69 protection
+ long runtimes
+ excellent OLED screen
+ fast SoC performance
+ surprisingly good camera

Cons

- high heat output
- bass-poor sound
- limited availability
- outdated security patches

Price and availability of the Vivo iQOO 15

The Vivo iQOO 15 launches in China with 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of UFS storage at a price of CNY 4,199 (approximately €500). At TradingShenzhen, the gaming smartphone is available as an import starting at around €580, while our test unit corresponds to the 12 GB RAM and 512 GB storage configuration. A global version is also available, including in India; however, the iQOO 15 has not yet been officially announced for Europe.

Amazon Logo
$11.99
NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Protector for Vivo IQOO 15 [6.85 Inch],[Anti-Spy Film],Scratch-Resistant, Easy Install [2 Pack]
  • $8.00
    MTRIEBA [3 Pack] Compatible for vivo iQOO 15 5G Tempered Glass Screen Protector [9H hardness][High Definition,Scratch-resistant and shatterproof]
  • $15.80
    Rfvzubemok Compatible with Vivo iQOO 15 5G Flip Kickstand PU Leather Zipper Wallet Magnetic Closure Phone Case Black

Specifications of the Vivo iQOO 15

Vivo iQOO 15
Processor
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X Ultra
Display
6.85 inch 20:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 508 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, LTPO 1-144 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 455 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz; 3G: B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19; 4G FDD-LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28A/B28B/B66/B71 - TDD-LTE: B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48; 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n18/n20/n26/n28A/n28B/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n71/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 163.7 x 76.8 ( = 0.32 x 6.44 x 3.02 in)
Battery
7000 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 24 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.6, 85 mm, OIS, tele) + 50 MPix (f/2.1, 15 mm, wide)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 21 mm, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, case, USB cable, ColorOS, 12 Months Warranty, BT Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | eSIM china only, fanless, waterproof
Weight
215 g ( = 7.58 oz / 0.47 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
580 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case and features – gaming smartphone with IP69 certification

Colour variants of the Vivo iQOO 15
Colour variants of the Vivo iQOO 15

The iQOO 15 is available in several versions, with the weight varying slightly depending on the colour variant. This is due to Vivo using different materials for the rear panel, including glass and fibreglass. The manufacturer does not disclose which type of protective glass is used on the front.

The chassis of the iQOO 15 is certified to IP68 and IP69 standards, features a metal frame, and conveys a high-quality feel in hand. The display-to-body ratio of almost 91 percent is particularly noteworthy for a gaming smartphone. The narrow bezels give the Android phone a near bezel-less appearance.

Features include an NFC chip, USB OTG support for connecting USB flash drives, an infrared port, and a fast USB Type-C 3.2 port. Surrounding the camera module, the iQOO 15 is also equipped with a coloured LED light ring, which can be used for various scenarios such as battery status, gaming indicators, and notifications.

Vivo iQOO 15 smartphone review
Vivo iQOO 15 smartphone review

Size comparison

163.7 mm / 6.44 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 215 g0.474 lbs162.7 mm / 6.41 in 77.9 mm / 3.07 in 7.96 mm / 0.3134 in 210 g0.463 lbs160.8 mm / 6.33 in 76.1 mm / 3 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 205 g0.4519 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 in 76.6 mm / 3.02 in 7.4 mm / 0.2913 in 190 g0.4189 lbs157.49 mm / 6.2 in 75.25 mm / 2.96 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 199 g0.4387 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Communication and operation – Android smartphone with Wi-Fi 7 and 5G

The iQOO 15 offers state-of-the-art connectivity with Bluetooth 6.0 and Wi-Fi 7. However, access to the fast 6-GHz frequency band is only partially available on our China version. Not all routers used in our tests were able to establish a connection to the 6-GHz channel, and data throughput was comparatively low.

In Europe, the gaming smartphone can be used with a dual-SIM setup. Important LTE bands such as Band 20 and Band 28 are supported, along with a wide range of 5G frequencies, meaning connectivity issues are not to be expected.

One standout feature in this price class is the excellent ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, which operates quickly and reliably. The vibration motor also impresses with crisp, high-quality haptic feedback, while the fast 144-Hz OLED display with a touch sampling rate of up to 3,200 Hz rounds out an excellent overall user experience.

Networking
Vivo iQOO 15
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
810 (min: 606) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1254 (min: 860) MBit/s ∼85%
Honor 400 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
958 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1238 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1349) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
949 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1006 (min: 504) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1589 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1188 (min: 1151) MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
967 (min: 933) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 548) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1905 (min: 1867) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
919 (min: 708) MBit/s ∼62%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
972 (min: 865) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
811 (min: 414) MBit/s ∼77%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
942 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1051 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1280 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1447 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
708 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
732 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1308 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼93%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450Tooltip
Vivo iQOO 15 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø810 (606-956)
Vivo iQOO 15 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1254 (860-1456)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø973 (865-1005)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø796 (414-855)

Software and sustainability – Android 16 and long-term updates for the Vivo phone

Despite being a China-only model, the iQOO 15 is well suited for use in Europe. OriginOS 6 includes full German language support and delivers a mature, well-rounded user experience. The manufacturer promises five Android version upgrades and seven years of security patches, although the latest security patch at the time of testing dated back to September 2025.

Installing and accessing the Google Play Store works without issues, and Android Auto is natively supported. Chinese apps can be removed, although certain software limitations cannot be resolved, including the lack of eSIM support, Wear OS smartwatch compatibility, and access to China-specific AI services only.

Transparency regarding sustainability remains limited. Vivo does not provide concrete information on the proportion of recycled materials, and user repairability is not emphasised and is difficult to verify. On a positive note, the packaging appears to be completely free of plastic.

Cameras – gaming smartphone relies on Sony sensors and image stabilisation

Although the iQOO 15 is primarily a gaming phone and does not focus heavily on its cameras, it still delivers pleasing photo quality. Vivo equips the device with Sony's IMX921 as its main camera, which is also used in the Vivo X200 FE.

In daylight, the 1/1.56-inch sensor with optical image stabilisation produces very good photos. Sharpness and dynamic range are convincing, and colour reproduction leaves little to criticise. In low-light conditions, however, the iQOO 15 shows the typical limitations of the relatively small Sony IMX921 sensor.

The square camera module on the rear houses two additional 50-MP sensors alongside the main camera, covering a periscope telephoto lens with three-times optical zoom and OIS, as well as an ultra-wide-angle lens.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angle lens
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo iQOO 15: 8.46 ∆E min: 2.61 - max: 13.1 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo iQOO 15: 17.43 ∆E min: 10.4 - max: 22.54 ∆E

Display – extra-bright OLED screen in the mid-range price segment

The iQOO 15 features a large 6.85-inch Samsung AMOLED display with a high 1440p resolution and a pixel density of 508 ppi. The refresh rate reaches 144 Hz, while Vivo specifies an HDR peak brightness of up to 6,000 nits. In the more practice-oriented APL18 test, we measured 2,885 cd/m², slightly exceeding the manufacturer's HBM specification of 2,600 nits.

As this is an OLED panel, brightness is controlled via pulse-width modulation. According to the manufacturer, the iQOO 15 uses high-frequency PWM dimming at 2,160 Hz to reduce potential negative effects such as visible flickering. Our measurements using Rigol software indicate a base frequency of around 560 Hz.

Display colour calibration was evaluated using Calman analysis software and a photospectrometer, revealing only minor deviations from the reference values.

1124
cd/m²
1135
cd/m²
1112
cd/m²
1106
cd/m²
1137
cd/m²
1116
cd/m²
1105
cd/m²
1099
cd/m²
1087
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1137 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1113.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1137 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.52 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265
CCT: 6560 K
Vivo iQOO 15
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.9"
Honor 400 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1280, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi 15T Pro
AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
AMOLED, 2510x1156, 6.6"
Screen
26%
-35%
2%
33%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1137
1535
35%
1136
0%
1064
-6%
1717
51%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1113
1531
38%
1132
2%
1069
-4%
1721
55%
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
99
3%
98
2%
99
3%
98
2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.52
1.1
28%
3.5
-130%
1.3
14%
1
34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.05
2.2
28%
5.5
-80%
3.4
-11%
2.2
28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.7
26%
2.4
-4%
2
13%
1.7
26%
Gamma
2.265 97%
2.29 96%
2.02 109%
2.22 99%
2.29 96%
CCT
6560 99%
6511 100%
6322 103%
6578 99%
6574 99%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3532 cd/m² +22%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
3269 cd/m² +13%
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2885 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1863 cd/m² -35%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1518 cd/m² -47%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5199 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3475 cd/m²
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
2868 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1990 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 561.3 Hz
Amplitude: 19 %

The display backlight flickers at 561.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 561.3 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8084 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

Color accuracy (profile: Professional, target color space: sRGB)
Color accuracy (profile: Professional, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Professional, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Professional, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Professional, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: Professional, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

Performance, emissions and battery life – best processor in a gaming smartphone

The iQOO 15 is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Qualcomm's current high-end SoC. In our benchmarks, the gaming smartphone delivers a very high level of performance. The iQOO 15 is particularly impressive in graphics tests, where the Adreno 840 achieves a strong 56 fps in the GFXBench 4K test.

However, the high heat output of the Vivo phone leads to thermally induced throttling, which we were able to trigger in the 3DMark stress tests. Surface temperatures measured during these tests are comparatively high.

The iQOO 15 is equipped with a 7,000 mAh battery that supports wired charging at up to 100 watts, while wireless charging reaches up to 40 watts. In the realistic Wi-Fi battery test with the display brightness adjusted to 150 cd/m², the smartphone achieves a very good runtime of almost 24 hours.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=9)
3663 Points +1%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3613 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3029 Points -16%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2624 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2118 Points -41%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2031 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=211, last 2 years)
1793 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
11178 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=9)
11156 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9530 Points -15%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7749 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6839 Points -39%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6042 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=211, last 2 years)
5245 Points -53%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
28056 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (23088 - 30621, n=8)
27457 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
24817 Points -12%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
22436 Points -20%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16971 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
15464 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30621, n=195, last 2 years)
11542 Points -59%
Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7255 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6289 - 8329, n=9)
7254 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6423 Points -11%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
5706 Points -21%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4593 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
4421 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8140, n=197, last 2 years)
3050 Points -58%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7321 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6168 - 8102, n=8)
7088 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
6538 Points -11%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
5824 Points -20%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4552 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
4142 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 8102, n=196, last 2 years)
3032 Points -59%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
121 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
120 fps 0%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
119 fps -1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
116 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=8)
103.4 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=208, last 2 years)
60.6 fps -49%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
334 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (203 - 361, n=9)
293 fps -12%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
239 fps -28%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
201 fps -40%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
189 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
156 fps -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 367, n=208, last 2 years)
121.1 fps -64%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
112 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
108 fps +3%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
105 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=8)
100.6 fps -4%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
86 fps -18%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
86 fps -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=209, last 2 years)
48.8 fps -54%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
129 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (65 - 145, n=9)
111.9 fps -13%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
89 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
84 fps -35%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
80 fps -38%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
80 fps -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 146, n=208, last 2 years)
46.6 fps -64%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
56 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (35 - 58, n=8)
48.6 fps -13%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
41 fps -27%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
38 fps -32%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
37 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
34 fps -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 62, n=209, last 2 years)
21.7 fps -61%
BaseMark OS II - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (7945 - 16690, n=8)
13630 Points +72%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10769 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9879 Points +24%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7945 Points
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7887 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=148, last 2 years)
7810 Points -2%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1042 Points +104%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=63, last 2 years)
777 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (511 - 843, n=8)
622 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
617 Points +21%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
511 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
324 Points -37%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
8818 Points +1646%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=63, last 2 years)
3274 Points +548%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
617 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 843, n=8)
599 Points +19%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
505 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
342 Points -32%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12177 Points +976%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=63, last 2 years)
4756 Points +320%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1383 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1986, n=8)
1298 Points +15%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1132 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1096 Points -3%
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
297.236 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
268.534 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2 - 480, n=5)
265 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 480, n=51, last 2 years)
225 Points -24%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
125.827 Points -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1257.8 ms * -259%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1252 ms * -258%
Average of class Smartphone
  (257 - 28190, n=154, last 2 years)
1143 ms * -226%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1140.4 ms * -226%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
483 ms * -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (284 - 635, n=8)
421 ms * -20%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
350.2 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Vivo iQOO 15Samsung Galaxy S25 FEXiaomi 15T ProXiaomi Poco F8 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-11%
-6%
12%
5%
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
2556.87
3756.44
47%
3219.93
26%
3959.14
55%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
2589.26
2450.19
-5%
3593.03
39%
3833.02
48%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
453.54
382.44
-16%
426.1
-6%
309.91
-32%
387 ?(279 - 576, n=26)
-15%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
689.01
198.68
-71%
110.46
-84%
521.31
-24%
Max. Load
 53.7 °C
129 F
53.9 °C
129 F
53.1 °C
128 F
 
 54.5 °C
130 F
54.2 °C
130 F
51.1 °C
124 F
 
 55 °C
131 F
54.8 °C
131 F
53 °C
127 F
 
Maximum: 55 °C = 131 F
Average: 53.7 °C = 129 F
47.6 °C
118 F
50.6 °C
123 F
47.9 °C
118 F
46.8 °C
116 F
49.2 °C
121 F
45.7 °C
114 F
48.5 °C
119 F
50.2 °C
122 F
48.3 °C
119 F
Maximum: 50.6 °C = 123 F
Average: 48.3 °C = 119 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 53.7 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.9 % +8%
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.9 %
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
62.9 % -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % -19%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.7 % -35%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73.8 % +12%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
73.3 % +11%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
67.5 % +3%
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.8 % -18%
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Vivo iQOO 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø28 (26-39.5)
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø24.1 (21.9-29.9)
Vivo iQOO 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.7 (93.6-142)
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø69.9 (62.5-88.1)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs207.626.3251428.83120.519.84023.227.45023.728.46322.822.58017.520.310021.127.512521.237.716012.647.720014.55425018.65531514.458.440014.754.55001360.163011.87080010.767.7100010.969.512508.772.916008.875.3200013.377.425005.673.93150-0.669.940004.169.250003.66663001.470.78000272.1100003.166.312500459.1160004.950.2SPL21.484.1N0.356.7median 10.8median 66.3Delta5.1836.939.135.435.727.536.728.440.829.84523.237.719.543.319.442.120.144.617.651.418.453.615.557.212.762.311.462.112.968.211.770.111.374.912.280.213.181.415.178.613.181.31380.613.381.713.382.413.382.613.680.713.677.213.675.213.769.71468.625.4920.791.6median 13.3median 75.21.19.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo iQOO 15Xiaomi 15T Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo iQOO 15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 15T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 143)
23h 42min
Vivo iQOO 15
7000 mAh
Honor 400 Pro
5300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
4900 mAh
Xiaomi 15T Pro
5500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
6210 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)
23.7
20.6
-13%
15.1
-36%
20.9
-12%
22.8
-4%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Vivo iQOO 15 delivers top-tier hardware at a very fair price. Unfortunately, the gaming phone is currently only available in Europe via import.

Vivo iQOO 15 - 01/09/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
65 / 69 → 94%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
47 / 55 → 86%
Application Performance
93 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
34%
Temperature
75%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
83%
Average
72%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
96%
Repairability
33%
Software Updates
83.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 57.9%

Possible alternatives at a glance

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.6%
Vivo iQOO 15
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Prote...
2. $8.00
MTRIEBA [3 Pack] Compatible ...
3. $15.80
Rfvzubemok Compatible with V...
List Price: 580€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.85"
3168x1440
508 PPI
AMOLED
2.
82.5%
Honor 400 Pro
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind For Honor 400 Pro 5G...
2. $9.88
LXEEOLX [2 Pack Screen Prote...
3. $11.99
AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Scr...
List Price: 800€
205 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
2800x1280
460 PPI
AMOLED
3.
85.6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.98
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
2. $6.99
amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou...
3. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
List Price: 809€
190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
382 PPI
AMOLED
4.
86.1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Xiaomi 15T Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind for Xiaomi 15T Pro 5...
2. $6.99
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for...
3. $7.59
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 1...
List Price: 1000€
210 g1TB UFS 4.1 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
AMOLED
5.
85.4%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $338.00
XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L...
2. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 P...
3. $349.50
XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L...
List Price: 700€
199 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.59"
2510x1156
419 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Android smartphone with spectacular hardware at a bargain price – Vivo iQOO 15 review
Marcus Herbrich, 2026-01-13 (Update: 2026-01-13)