Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Samsung Xclipse 920

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 644Samsung Xclipse 920
Xclipse 900 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 18.01.2022
PredecessorAdreno 642
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
275 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825     avg: 832     median: 829 (1%)     max: 854 Points
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
3589 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 16.4     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 41     avg: 45.3     median: 46 (3%)     max: 49 fps
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
170281 Points (12%)
402385 Points (28%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
136.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
8695 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 170% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 644:
45  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
73%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
99%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
100%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
80%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 88%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 88%

Qualcomm Adreno 644Samsung Xclipse 920
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet6767
PUBG Mobile6040404439.532
Dead Trigger 260
Subway Surfers61
Qualcomm Adreno 644Samsung Xclipse 920
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1


1


1
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 26. 02:13:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761441205s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Oct 2025 05:18:42 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.018s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.009s ... 0.053s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0s ... 0.053s

#11 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.058s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.065s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.066s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.067s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.079s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.079s

#19 Got 29 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.085s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.085s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.086s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.089s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.089s

#24 return log +0.001s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)