Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 613 vs Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 616

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 616

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 616 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 512 in the Snapdragon 660).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 613Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 616
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600RDNA 2Adreno 600
Core Speed955 MHz555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology4 nm4 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement26.06.2023 18.01.2022 15.12.2015
CodenameRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 616GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7128 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7108 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6708 x 2016 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22381     avg: 37106     median: 38288.5 (4%)     max: 43514 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1817 Points (8%)
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1591 Points (4%)
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.7 fps (1%)
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4 fps (1%)
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
9.6 fps (1%)
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
19 fps (0%)
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
27 fps (1%)
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
54 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 616
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
49834 Points (4%)
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
17.2 fps (0%)
136.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
411 Points (0%)
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
626 Points (0%)
8695 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8622     avg: 9428     median: 9192.5 (3%)     max: 10698 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2466     avg: 2689     median: 2629.5 (4%)     max: 2911 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 650% n=8

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 121% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
high
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
153%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
404%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
113%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
92%
Adreno 616:
30 38 40 ~ 36 fps
med.
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
100%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
107%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
27 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 616:
31 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps
ultra
Adreno 616:
54 57 60 60 ~ 58 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 616:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 616:
59 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 616:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 616:
26 29 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
Adreno 616:
22 27 29 29 29 29 30 30 ~ 28 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 194%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 194%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 96%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 92%

Qualcomm Adreno 613Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 616
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift87.359.660
Genshin Impact38.914.459.559.358.2
PUBG Mobile3929.94439.5323630
Qualcomm Adreno 613Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 616
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1



1


1
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2


2


1
1

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 19. 01:48:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9401 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752882510s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:21:38 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0.019s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 12697 +0.005s ... 0.03s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0s ... 0.03s

#12 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.036s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9401 +0s ... 0.036s

#14 got single benchmarks 9401 +0.013s ... 0.049s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.054s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.055s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.056s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.057s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.071s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.071s

#22 Got 62 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.08s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.08s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.08s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.083s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.083s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)