Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642 , its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.
The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 612 Qualcomm Adreno 642 Qualcomm Adreno 644 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 14 nm 5 nm 4 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 07.05.2021 07.05.2021 Predecessor Adreno 642
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
5587 Points (24%)
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
8380 Points (18%)
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
4478 Points (22%)
min: 5501 avg: 6172 median: 6286 (31%) max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
6148 Points (18%)
min: 6767 avg: 7065 median: 7023 (21%) max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
3212 Points (2%)
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3143 (2%) max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
786 Points (1%)
min: 825 avg: 834 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7 avg: 7.5 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
18 fps (3%)
min: 15 avg: 16.6 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
50 fps (4%)
min: 41 avg: 46 median: 47 (3%) max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
40 fps (5%)
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
65 fps (1%)
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
90 fps (5%)
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
162946 Points (20%)
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
48 fps (0%)
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2496 avg: 2535 median: 2498 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650 avg: 2794 median: 2738 (1%) max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (17%) max: 23891 Points
30029 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (15%) max: 15659 Points
42541 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=14 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 474% n=14 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 497% n=14
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
223%
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
150%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
133%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 190% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 213%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 152% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 152%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 06. 04:09:31
#0 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.179s ... 0.18s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.18s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.18s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.054s ... 0.234s
#9 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.025s ... 0.259s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.002s ... 0.261s
#11 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.009s ... 0.27s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.002s ... 0.272s
#13 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.019s ... 0.291s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.291s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.173s ... 0.464s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.464s
#17 Got 31 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.483s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.483s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.487s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.018s ... 0.505s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.505s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.507s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)