AMD Ryzen 7 7730U & Ryzen 5 7530U initial benchmarks - Zen 3 is still competitive
AMD complicates its mobile product line-up with a plethora of different models called Ryzen 7000. In addition to the brand-new Zen4 SoCs (Phoenix), which are not available yet, there are also models based on Zen3+, Zen3, and even Zen2. This means you have to pay attention to the third digit when you buy a Ryzen 7000 laptop or might be disappointed, because it indicates the Zen generation. Let's take the Ryzen 7 7730U as an example: The first 7 indicates a Ryzen 7000 chip, the second 7 indicates the performance level (Ryzen 7) and the third digit (in this case the 3) indicates Zen3. The fourth digit makes it even more complicated, because the 0 indicates Barcelo-R and the 5 indicates Rembrandt-R (Ryzen 7 7735U for example is based on Zen3+). Sounds confusing? It definitely is, and you have to look at the specs very closely. The following table shows the current line-up of Ryzen 7000 mobile processors:
Model | GPU | Cores | max. clock | Base clock | GPU cores | Default TDP | Architecture CPU/GPU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7945HX | AMD Radeon™ 610M | 16/32 | 5.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | 2 | 55W | Zen4 (5 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7845HX | AMD Radeon™ 610M | 12/24 | 5.2 GHz | 3.0 GHz | 2 | 55W | Zen4 (5 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 7 7745HX | AMD Radeon™ 610M | 8/16 | 5.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz | 2 | 55W | Zen4 (5 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 5 7645HX | AMD Radeon™ 610M | 6/12 | 5.0 GHz | 4.0 GHz | 2 | 55W | Zen4 (5 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7940HS | AMD Radeon™ 780M | 8/16 | 5.2 GHz | 4.0 GHz | 12 | 35-54W | Zen4 (5 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 7 7840HS | AMD Radeon™ 780M | 8/16 | 5.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz | 12 | 35-54W | Zen4 (4 nm)/RDNA3 |
AMD Ryzen™ 5 7640HS | AMD Radeon™ 760M | 6/12 | 5.0 GHz | 4.3 GHz | 8 | 35-54W | Zen4 (4 nm)/RDNA3 |
AMD Ryzen™ 7 7735HS | AMD Radeon™ 680M | 8/16 | 4.75 GHz | 3.2 GHz | 12 | 35-54W | Zen4 (4 nm)/RDNA3 |
AMD Ryzen™ 5 7535HS | AMD Radeon™ 660M | 6/12 | 4.55 GHz | 3.3 GHz | 6 | 35-54W | Zen3+ (6 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 7 7736U | AMD Radeon™ 680M | 8/16 | 4.7 GHz | 2.7 GHz | 12 | 15-28W | Zen3+ (6 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 7 7735U | AMD Radeon™ 680M | 8/16 | 4.75 GHz | 2.7 GHz | 12 | 28W | Zen3+ (6 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 5 7535U | AMD Radeon™ 660M | 6/12 | 4.55 GHz | 2.9 GHz | 6 | 28W | Zen3+ (6 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 3 7335U | AMD Radeon™ 660M | 4/8 | 4.3 GHz | 3.0 GHz | 4 | 28W | Zen3+ (6 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 7 7730U | AMD Radeon™ Graphics | 8/16 | 4.5 GHz | 2.0 GHz | 8 | 15W | Zen3 (7 nm)/Vega |
AMD Ryzen™ 5 7530U | AMD Radeon™ Graphics | 6/12 | 4.5 GHz | 2.0 GHz | 7 | 15W | Zen3 (7 nm)/Vega |
AMD Ryzen™ 3 7330U | AMD Radeon™ Graphics | 4/8 | 4.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | 6 | 15W | Zen3 (7 nm)/Vega |
AMD Ryzen™ 5 7520U | AMD Radeon™ 610M | 4/8 | 4.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | 2 | 15W | Zen2 (6 nm)/RDNA2 |
AMD Ryzen™ 3 7320U | AMD Radeon™ 610M | 4/8 | 4.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | 2 | 15W | 4 MB |
Ryzen 7 7730U & Ryzen 5 7530U
The two models Ryzen 7 7730U as well as Ryzen 5 7530U are basically old chips, because the specs are identical to the previous models Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 5 5625U, respectively (but with 200 MHz higher single-core clock). This means they use 8 Zen3 cores (7 nm) combined with the old iGPUs RX Vega 8 and RX Vega 7. Our review devices are the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14 G8 and Flex 5 16 G8, where the CPUs can consume up to 48 Watts.
Our benchmarks clearly shows that the new models are (as expected) pretty much identical to their predecessors. Both the Ryzen 7 6800U and the Intel chips have an advantage in single-core scenarios, but the "new" Zen3 models are holding up pretty well in multi-core tests. Longer tests like Cinebench R23 Multi even show that the Ryzen 7 7730U is actually not much slower than Intel's latest and greatest Raptor Lake Core i7-1360P.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
CPU Performance Rating | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
Intel Core i7-1260P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
Intel Core i5-1235U | |
Intel Core i7-1255U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Intel Core i7-1255U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
Intel Core i5-1235U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Intel Core i5-1235U | |
Intel Core i7-1255U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
Intel Core i7-1260P | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
Intel Core i7-1255U | |
Intel Core i5-1235U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Intel Core i5-1235U | |
Intel Core i7-1255U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
Intel Core i7-1260P | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
Intel Core i5-1235U | |
Intel Core i7-1255U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
Intel Core i5-1235U | |
Intel Core i7-1260P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
Intel Core i7-1255U |
It is even more interesting when we look at the Cinebench R15 Multi loop. It obviously depends on individual laptops and their capabilities to maintain high Turbo clocks, but modern Intel CPUs in particular usually show a significant performance drop after the first run. The Ryzen 7 7730U is actually faster than the brand-new Core i7-1360P in the R15 Multi loop. However, the Ryzen 7 5825U in the HP Envy x360 was even a bit faster.
The smaller Ryzen 5 7530U also performs well and is faster than the Core i7-1255U in the Surface Pro 9 and is also just a bit slower than the Core i7-1260P in the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Carbon.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
The two Ryzen 7000 CPUs can utilize high power limits in the current test devices, so the efficiency is not particularly good. The Zen3 SoCs are roughly on par with the Intel competition, but the Ryzen 7 6800U with the Zen3+ cores is much more efficient in the multi-core tests.
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
Intel Core i7-1260P | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1255U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U |
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Intel Core i7-1255U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U | |
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U | |
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
Intel Core i7-1360P | |
Intel Core i7-1260P |
The GPU benchmarks do not offer any surprises since we are pretty familiar with the two iGPUs Radeon RX Vega 7 and RX Vega 8. The RX Vega 7 is slightly ahead of the current Intel Iris Xe Graphics with 80 EUs, and the Vega 8 cannot quite keep up with the faster Iris Xe Graphics (96 EUs). The integrated Radeon 680M, however, is much faster.
Verdict - Zen 3 is still competitive
The "old" new Zen3 CPUs from AMD still offer decent performance in the beginning of 2023. The multi-core performance in particular is still competitive and even Intel's latest Raptor Lake mobile processor does not have a significant advantage. This is also the case for the integrated GPUs; the Iris Xe Graphics G7 with 96 EUs is a bit faster than the Vega 8, but both chips are on a very low performance level overall, so the difference does not really matter.
The Zen3 CPUs are still a good choice, especially for inexpensive laptops, but we have to criticize AMDs current product line-up. We don't really know how a consumer is supposed to know what to choose considering the the large table above. The Zen3+ SoCs like the Ryzen 7 7735U are probably the most interesting models since they are based on the very good Ryzen 7 6800U from last year, which was not widely available. The new Zen4 U-series chips are still not here and we do not expect that the availability will be very good.