Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt

A powerful all-in-one tablet for smart spenders - Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 review

iPad killer.

With the Poco Pad X1, Xiaomi has the classic iPad in its sights, offering not only better features but also a lower price, without compromising on quality. Is this the perfect tablet for everyone?
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪
Android Touchscreen Tablet

Verdict - Poco Pad X1

The Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 presents itself as a premium mid-range tablet that comes with a slim metal case and impressive build quality. The protruding camera proves to be somewhat annoying in everyday use, but this can be avoided by using a protective case. The display offers excellent image quality, a flicker-free display, and high brightness.

The Snapdragon chip is responsible for smooth performance, even when playing games. However, it lacks a headphone jack, a fingerprint sensor, and a vibration motor. On the plus side, it features Wi-Fi 6E, NFC, and good stylus support, albeit with cameras that only deliver average results.

Running HyperOS 3.0 based on Android 16, the Poco Pad X1's software is bang up-to-date, but advertising and pre-installed apps slightly detract from the user experience. Updates are guaranteed for five years, which is decent for a device in this price range.

Pros

+ flicker-free 144Hz display
+ decent sound
+ pen and keyboard support
+ speedy SoC

Cons

- only a 12-month warranty
- no fingerprint sensor
- accessories are quite expensive

Price and availability

The Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 can be purchased on Xiaomi's store on Amazon UK or AliExpress.

Amazon Logo
  • Ibywind for Xiaomi Pad 7/Pad 7 Pro/Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Screen Protector,2-Pack,9H Hardness Tempered Glass with Easy Installation Tool,Bubble-Free,Fingerprint Unlock,Anti-Shatter,Anti-Scratch
  • Keyboard Case Compatible with Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 11.2 inch (2025) Backlit Detachable Bluetooth Wireless Keyboard Case PU Leather Cover Compatible with Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 11.2" Tablet (Black)
  • Suttkue for Redmi pad pro/Xiaomi Poco Pad/Redmi pad 2 pro 12.1 inch Screen Protector,9H Hardness, Anti-Scratch, Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly, Anti-Scratch,(2PACK)

The Pad X1 is the flagship tablet in Poco's tablet portfolio, released simultaneously with the Poco Pad M1. While it also focuses on multimedia, it features a slightly smaller display and higher-quality components, which is a distinction that extends to the optional accessories.

Poco Pad X1 is not officially intended for the European market, where it is represented by the virtually identical Xiaomi Pad 7. As a result, the tablet has no official MSRP, but it can already be found for under £330 from various retailers.

Specifications: Poco Pad X1

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Poco Pad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, 1 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X4, 4 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 3 x 1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex-X4, A720, A520
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
11.20 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 344 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, TFT-LCD, up to 360 Hz touch sampling rate, Wet touch technology, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 480.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.18 x 251.22 x 173.42 ( = 0.24 x 9.89 x 6.83 in)
Battery
8850 mAh Lithium-Ion, QC3+, QC3.0, QC2.0, PD3.0, PD2.0, MI FC2.0
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (OV13B10, 1/3.06", 1.12 µm, f/2.2, 28 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (OV08D10, 1/4", 1.12 µm, f/2.28, 18 mm)
Additional features
Keyboard: OnScreen, 45W-Chaerger, USB-Cabel, HyperOS 3.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LHDC 5.0, LDAC | GNSS: not supported | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | USB Copy Test: 346.51 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | max. charging speed: 45 W (wired), fanless
Released
11/26/2025
Weight
500 g ( = 17.64 oz / 1.1 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
389 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Poco Pad X1 has a metal unibody

The Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 comes in blue and gray and is only 6.18 mm thick, although we measured 6.45 mm. The camera protrudes 3.2 mm, which can cause the tablet to wobble when placed on a table. An optional case can remedy this.

The build quality of the metal unibody case is impressive. It feels very premium to the touch and only creaks minimally when twisted. The gaps are tight and even. The metal case is a bit of a fingerprint magnet, but it is easy to clean.

Xiaomi hasn't provided any information regarding an IP rating.

Size comparison

254.3 mm / 10 in 165.8 mm / 6.53 in 6 mm / 0.2362 in 497 g1.096 lbs251.22 mm / 9.89 in 173.42 mm / 6.83 in 6.18 mm / 0.2433 in 500 g1.102 lbs251.22 mm / 9.89 in 173.42 mm / 6.83 in 6.18 mm / 0.2433 in 500 g1.102 lbs248.6 mm / 9.79 in 179.5 mm / 7.07 in 7 mm / 0.2756 in 477 g1.052 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Features - A Poco tablet with premium functions

The Poco Pad X1 features a fast USB 3.2 port, which can also be used for wired video output. It can mirror the tablet's screen, but a desktop mode is lacking.

In addition to Xiaomi's connectivity options, the X1 also offers NFC and can be used as an additional screen for your computer via Miracast. An IR blaster is also on board. However, it comes without a vibration motor and a fingerprint sensor. A headphone jack and microSD card support are also missing in action.

Software - HyperOS 3.0 is already here

The Poco Pad X1 originally shipped with Google Android 15 and Xiaomi HyperOS 2.0, but shortly after our review began, it received an update to the current HyperOS 3.0, which is based on Android 16. The Xiaomi tablet is slated to receive major updates for three years and security patches for five years. Xiaomi's HyperAI is also included.

Unfortunately, the tablet also contains some advertising as well as several pre-installed third-party apps. However, these can be easily uninstalled. You can find out how to remove the ads in this article

Sustainability

Xiaomi hasn't provided any specific information regarding the sustainability of its Poco Pad X1. The packaging is plastic-free, but sealed in a clear film.

Since the Poco Pad X1 is not officially available in Germany, Xiaomi doesn't offer any repair manuals or spare parts. However, the tablet is compatible with the identical Pad 7i, and this is why the resources for the sister model can be used.

Communication - Fast Wi-Fi for the Pad X1

The Poco Pad X1 utilizes fast Wi-Fi 6E and can therefore operate in the 6 GHz band. Consequently, the data transfer speeds to our Asus Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router are very high.

However, the Xiaomi tablet does not support satellite positioning. For video conferencing, it does include noise cancellation, "FocusFrame" (similar to Apple's Center Stage), and a cross-device camera. The latter permits the use of a smartphone's camera when connected via Xiaomi's interconnect technology.

Networking
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
937 (min: 835) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
944 (min: 831) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1804 (min: 1617) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1589 (min: 1487) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
905 (min: 435) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
698 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1798 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 765) MBit/s ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
642 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
746 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼47%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 962) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
867 (min: 554) MBit/s ∼92%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
951 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
934 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1371 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1331 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
606 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
705 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1240 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1431 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼90%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1804 (1617-1884)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1487-1628)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø937 (835-971)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (962-992)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (831-988)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø866 (554-892)

Cameras - Solid optics during the day

A selfie with the Poco Pad X1
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
A selfie with the Poco Pad X1

On the front, the Poco Pad X1 delivers solid image quality for video calls, but these videos can be recorded in Full HD (30fps) at best. Additionally, it uses the same sensor as seen in the Pad M1.

The main camera on the back features a larger OmniVision sensor and offers a slightly higher resolution. Images taken with it appear both natural and balanced, and deliver a high level of detail in daylight. This even makes it feasible to capture the occasional snapshot.

The Pad X1 records videos in Ultra HD (30fps) at best, and even manages 60fps in 1080p. However, the electronic image stabilization gets overwhelmed quickly by the high frame rate.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain camera5x zoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
3.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco Pad X1: 4.33 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 7.41 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco Pad X1: 47.12 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 93.69 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Only a 12-month warranty

The Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 comes with a 45-watt charger and a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C). The Poco Focus Pen, a cover, and the Floating Keyboard are available as optional accessories.

The accessories are identical to those of the Xiaomi Pad 7, and this is quite an attractive proposition, depending on availability and price.

Xiaomi provides its tablet with a 12-month international warranty, which does not affect the dealer's warranty. Xiaomi Care is not available for tablets.

Input devices and operation - The Poco tablet offers face recognition

The capacitive touchscreen performed reliably in our tests and offered a pleasantly smooth experience when performing swiping gestures. It also supports the Poco Focus Pen (or Xiaomi Focus Pen), which boasts a latency of just 3 ms and can distinguish up to 8,192 levels of pressure sensitivity. You can store and charge the pen by attaching it magnetically to the tablet. The writing experience is good.

The optional floating keyboard (or Xiaomi Pad 7 Focus Keyboard) allows for flexible adjustment of the tablet's viewing angle and offers quiet keystrokes and adaptive backlighting. The small touchpad responds precisely and reliably.

In good lighting conditions, the face recognition via the front camera also works reliably, but is hit-or-miss in the dark. Unfortunately, only two faces can be saved, and both a fingerprint sensor and a vibration motor are absent.

QWERTY layout of the optional Floating Keyboard
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
QWERTY layout of the optional Floating Keyboard

Display - The Poco Pad X1 uses a high-contrast and flicker-free LCD

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The Poco Pad X1's 11.2-inch (28.45 cm) LCD display delivers a high pixel density, and the result is crisp, sharp images. The contrast ratio is also excellent thanks to a decent black level. The system dynamically adjusts the refresh rate between 30 and 144 Hz and supports every common HDR standard.

For an LCD, the panel's brightness is good, the backlighting is excellent, and we were unable to detect any light bleed on our review device. Furthermore, Xiaomi doesn't use PWM for its brightness control, and we also didn't observe any temporal dithering.

712
cd/m²
730
cd/m²
711
cd/m²
720
cd/m²
794
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
717
cd/m²
736
cd/m²
715
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 794 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 726.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.46 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 794 cd/m²
Contrast: 1689:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6962 K
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
TFT-LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Xiaomi Pad 7
LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
IPS, 2304x1440, 10.9"
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Screen
-3%
13%
-21%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
794
838
6%
663
-16%
526
-34%
Brightness (cd/m²)
727
815
12%
617
-15%
531
-27%
Brightness Distribution (%)
89
96
8%
84
-6%
93
4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.47
0.88
-87%
0.39
17%
0.99
-111%
Contrast (:1)
1689
952
-44%
1700
1%
531
-69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.2
1.8
18%
1.47
33%
1.9
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
3.9
33%
4.14
29%
4
31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
2.5
32%
1.4
62%
2.9
22%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.25 98%
2.199 100%
2.14 103%
CCT
6962 93%
6912 94%
6730 97%
6982 93%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
814 cd/m² +3%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
788 cd/m²
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
547 cd/m² -31%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
574 cd/m²
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
565 cd/m² -2%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
546 cd/m² -5%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8033 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

We achieved the most natural color reproduction when we selected the Professional color profile and the Warm temperature preset. However, even then, the white balance was still a bit on the cool side, and cyan showed visible deviations in the test. In everyday use, though, this shouldn't be a significant issue.

Gray scales (profile: professional, color temperature: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Gray scales (profile: professional, color temperature: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (profile: professional, color temperature: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (profile: professional, color temperature: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: professional, color temperature: warm, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: professional, color temperature: warm, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.733 ms rise
↘ 13.36 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.83 ms rise
↘ 24.59 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).

The tablet remains easily readable on overcast days, but reflections can quickly become bothersome when viewed side on.

Viewing angle stability is good, and we only noticed a slight drop in brightness at wide viewing angles.

Viewing angle stability
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
Viewing angle stability

Performance - The Poco tablet comes with a Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3

In terms of performance, the Poco Pad X1 finds itself positioned in the upper mid-range and uses a Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 with 8 GB of LPDDR5x RAM. When it comes to CPU performance, it lags a little bit behind the iPad. However, in everyday situations, it delivers smooth system performance.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
2566 Points +37%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1893 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
1869 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (1168 - 1893, n=5)
1735 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (323 - 4128, n=95, last 2 years)
1584 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1367 Points -27%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
5939 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
5230 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
5089 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (1104 - 16544, n=95, last 2 years)
5036 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (3865 - 5230, n=5)
4816 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
3921 Points -25%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1408366 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
1388868 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (235067 - 3475590, n=67, last 2 years)
1306387 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (1095324 - 1408366, n=3)
1282866 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
894364 Points
Antutu v11 - Score
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
1743279 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (n=1)
1743279 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (522205 - 2274547, n=5, last 2 years)
1342976 Points -23%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
16011 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
15466 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (14109 - 16011, n=3)
15195 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (7084 - 27428, n=72, last 2 years)
13512 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
13344 Points -17%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
8570 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
8323 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (6899 - 8570, n=4)
8036 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=63, last 2 years)
6435 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
6058 Points -29%
System
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
11365 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (9114 - 11365, n=4)
10172 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10013 Points -12%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
9977 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=63, last 2 years)
9710 Points -15%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
10045 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
9332 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (6544 - 10045, n=4)
8776 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
7554 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=63, last 2 years)
7524 Points -19%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
25400 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (23684 - 27713, n=4)
25242 Points -1%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
24169 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=63, last 2 years)
17934 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10293 Points -59%
Web
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
2002 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1887 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (1604 - 2002, n=4)
1841 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
1730 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=63, last 2 years)
1587 Points -21%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (3164 - 76852, n=59, last 2 years)
18872 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
14598 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
13965 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (10851 - 14598, n=3)
13138 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
10741 Points -26%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (166 - 5295, n=33, last 2 years)
645 Points +47%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
440 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (413 - 440, n=3)
431 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
268 Points -39%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 41155, n=33, last 2 years)
2980 Points +574%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
442 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (414 - 442, n=3)
433 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
270 Points -39%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57388, n=33, last 2 years)
4322 Points +327%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
1012 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (954 - 1019, n=3)
995 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
634 Points -37%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 8192
5079 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  (3671 - 5079, n=2)
4375 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 17293, n=31, last 2 years)
3836 Points -24%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
3671 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 12288
300 Points -94%

Graphics processing is handled by the Adreno 732, which does not support ray tracing but nominally offers more power than the A16 GPU in the iPad. However, depending on the benchmark scenario, this advantage is cancelled out by the higher resolution.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3107 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2893 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2559 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1488 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3098 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2960 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2611 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1519 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11377 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
10598 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5184 Points -54%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3698 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3654 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
974 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
939 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
677 Points -28%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
987 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
934 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
696 Points -25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -26%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
501 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
484 fps
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
378.9 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
153 fps -68%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +11%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -29%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
297 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
265 fps
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
205.2 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +13%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -4%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
141.6 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
57.6 fps +75%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -3%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.3 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
40.9 fps +41%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps -14%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -4%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
40.1 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
55.9 fps +22%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -20%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -4%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
104.1 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -61%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23 fps -4%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
16.7 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.7 fps -60%
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)
256.364 Points
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
253.674 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (229 - 256, n=2)
243 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
228.764 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=33, last 2 years)
213 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
169.88 Points -34%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
236 Points +55%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)
152 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
151 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (39 - 376, n=68, last 2 years)
146.8 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
138 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (110 - 152, n=3)
137.7 Points -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
74543 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)
70183 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
66744 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (55668 - 70183, n=3)
64198 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
50864 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=89, last 2 years)
47209 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=78, last 2 years)
2310 ms * -325%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE (Chrome 135)
790.8 ms * -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (544 - 1153, n=3)
754 ms * -39%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
564.8 ms * -4%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (Chrome 143)
543.9 ms *
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
411.4 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1Xiaomi Pad 7Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FELenovo Idea Tab ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
21%
-33%
73%
41%
-15%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4068.41
3911.82
-4%
1602.8
-61%
3648.3
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3751.24
3387.43
-10%
1271.5
-66%
3298.5
-12%
3123 ?(1494 - 4051, n=51)
-17%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
203.66
311.09
53%
225.1
11%
474.4
133%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
237.72
344.51
45%
204.2
-14%
668
181%

Emissions - Only slight losses under load

Temperature

Surface temperatures remain safe in every possible scenario. The SoC cooling is also successful, and only results in a comparatively small level of throttling in the stress test, yet it still generates the most frames in the comparison.

Max. Load
 34.4 °C
94 F
40.2 °C
104 F
38.8 °C
102 F
 
 30.1 °C
86 F
31.6 °C
89 F
31.6 °C
89 F
 
 30.5 °C
87 F
31 °C
88 F
31.8 °C
89 F
 
Maximum: 40.2 °C = 104 F
Average: 33.3 °C = 92 F
38.1 °C
101 F
40.4 °C
105 F
34.7 °C
94 F
32.4 °C
90 F
35.3 °C
96 F
30.6 °C
87 F
29.8 °C
86 F
30.8 °C
87 F
29.6 °C
85 F
Maximum: 40.4 °C = 105 F
Average: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  38.1 °C = 101 F | Room Temperature 20.6 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +15%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.8 % +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.9 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 % +3%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.1 %
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.7 % -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.4 % -6%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.4 %
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø17.5 (17.4-18.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.98 (8.89-9.1)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14 (13.8-15.2)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø61.7 (56.1-65.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.8 (31.6-32)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.5 (51.5-56.8)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø6.87 (6.78-6.96)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø5.01 (4.99-5.03)

Speakers

The Xiaomi Poco Pad X1's four speakers support Dolby Atmos and deliver relatively good sound, albeit lacking depth.

Alternatively, audio output is possible via USB-C or Bluetooth.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.838.12529.630.43119.331.64025.3325033.336.36320.733.98023.837.910018.445.612515.251.716011.962.5200156225011.764.431511.765.640010.165.75009.868.863010.87580011.377.4100011.381.7125012.381.8160011.780.9200011.378.825001276.9315012.276.2400012.876.4500013.167.5630013.370.9800013.3681000013.459.91250013.369.71600012.970.5SPL24.489.4N0.578.4median 12.2median 70.5Delta1.36.438.239.932.53421.931.431.431.533.538.521.730.32426.917.837.316.640.919.754.71956.817.559.216.259.416.559.412.368.112.370.41569.513.26712.472.311.670.913.376.81275.912.775.412.977.113.3771373.413.173.913.566.313.665.613.458.325.486.10.765.9median 13.3median 68.11.77.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco Pad X1Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad 11 (2025) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery runtimes - Surprisingly short

Power consumption

The Poco Pad X1's power consumption is surprisingly slightly higher than that of the almost identical Xiaomi Pad 7, but it's still on a respectable level compared to other tablets on the market.

The tablet can be charged at up to 45 watts and took 88 minutes to charge in our tests (50%: 37 min.; 80%: 66 min.).

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 2.45 / 2.58 Watt
Load midlight 7.31 / 9.17 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
8850 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
8000 mAh
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
7698 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
14%
-36%
-119%
-30%
-83%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.7
0.74
-6%
2.1
-200%
1.43
-104%
1.1 ?(0.7 - 1.8, n=5)
-57%
Idle Average * (Watt)
2.45
1.72
30%
2.5
-2%
7.16
-192%
3.6 ?(1.1 - 8.55, n=5)
-47%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
2.58
1.74
33%
2.9
-12%
7.2
-179%
3.72 ?(1.5 - 8.57, n=5)
-44%
Load Average * (Watt)
7.31
7.26
1%
5.8
21%
11.23
-54%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
9.17
8.11
12%
7.9
14%
15.03
-64%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.29 (0.969-9.16)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.53 (0.924-8.1)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.726 (0.693-0.912)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.76 (0.702-1.424)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.98 (8.77-9.12)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.05 (7.98-8.09)
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.726 (0.693-0.912)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.76 (0.702-1.424)

Battery life

What was already apparent in the power consumption test is now a bitter reality in the battery test, with the battery life being significantly shorter than that of the Pad 7

Nevertheless, the battery life is good, and the Poco Pad X1 keeps going for significantly longer than the iPad. Xiaomi might also improve this further with an update.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 142)
13h 54min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
8850 mAh
13.9 h
Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh
18.1 h
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
8000 mAh
14.8 h
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
7698 mAh
10.6 h

Notebookcheck overall rating

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 review. Review equipment provided by Xiaomi.
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 review. Review equipment provided by Xiaomi.

The Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 is a well-made mid-range tablet with an excellent display and fast performance, but things can quickly get expensive with the optional accessories.

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 - 02/06/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
58 / 69 → 84%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
90%
Display
84%
Games Performance
42 / 65 → 64%
Application Performance
72 / 92 → 78%
AI Performance
30%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 92%
Camera
60 / 90 → 66%
Average
65%
86%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
97.1%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
72.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 47.4%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
85.8%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
Ibywind for Xiaomi Pad 7/Pad...
2. 
Keyboard Case Compatible wit...
3. 
Suttkue for Redmi pad pro/Xi...
List Price: 389€
500 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
TFT-LCD
2.
85.9%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. 
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
3. 
XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
List Price: 400€
500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
LCD
3.
81.6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 779€
497 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash10.90"
2304x1440
249 PPI
IPS
4.
83.9%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic ⎘
Apple A16 GPU 4-Core ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. 
Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip...
2. 
Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip...
3. 
Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip...
List Price: 399€
477 g128 GB NVMe10.86"
2360x1640
265 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > A powerful all-in-one tablet for smart spenders - Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 review
Daniel Schmidt, 2026-02- 7 (Update: 2026-02- 8)