Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-8145U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

Intel Core i3-8145U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-8145U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation and will probably be announced in August 2018. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i3-8130U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i3-8145U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 3.9 GHz (versus 3.4 GHz of the i3-8130U) for a single core (3.7 GHz for 2 cores) but a slightly lower base clock of 2.1 versus 2.2 GHz. The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Thermal Velocity Boost is not supported (only in the Core i7-8565U).

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

Due to the higher Turbo Boost (+12% single core), the Core i3-8145U should be faster than the old Core i3-8130U (Kaby Lake-R). The single core Turbo Boost is similar to the old high end model, the Core i7-7600U. However, the guaranteed base clock of 2.1 GHz is a lot lower (2.8 GHz for the i7-7600U) and also the 2-core Turbo is lower (3.7 versus 3.8 GHz). Therefore, the performance should be similar to the Core i7-7500U (Kaby Lake).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Warning: Above information is partly still based on rumors and leaks and may therefore change till release.

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3200U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U is a dual-core SoC designed for laptops that was announced in January 2019. The Ryzen features two Zen cores with support for the thread-doubling SMT tech, clocked at 2.6 GHz - 3.5 GHz. The built-in Radeon RX Vega 3 iGPU has 3 CUs (192 unified shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. The default TDP is 15 W which makes the Ryzen a good fit for thin mid-range laptops.

In comparison to the faster Ryzen 3000 CPUs, the 3200U is not using the newer Zen+ microarchitecture and is still manufactured in 14nm. Compared to the old Ryzen 3 2200U, the 3200U therefore only offers a 100 MHz higher clock speed.

The Ryzen 3 is compatible with single-channel or dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM.

Please go to our Raven Ridge launch article for details on the architecture and more.

Performance

The average 3200U in our extensive database is anything but a performance monster, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-8130U and the Pentium N6000. While not as atrociously slow as most N-series and J-series Intel chips, this specific Ryzen is good enough for basic day-to-day activities only.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W; most will go for a higher value to extract more performance out of it. Either way, an active cooling solution will be needed to dissipate the heat.

The R3 3200U is built with a 14 nm manufacturing process for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i3-8145UAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UPicasso-U (Zen)
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Clock2100 - 3900 MHz2600 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB192 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1528FP5
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors4500 Million
max. Temp.105 °C
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3200U
22.5 pt (37%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1767     avg: 1786     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1804 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 208     avg: 584     median: 765 (31%)     max: 780 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
296 Points (32%)
min: 274     avg: 298.2     median: 301 (33%)     max: 318 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
657 Points (2%)
min: 453     avg: 607     median: 690 (2%)     max: 727 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 318     avg: 345.5     median: 351.5 (2%)     max: 361 Points
min: 318     avg: 335     median: 334 (2%)     max: 353 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 139     avg: 147.5     median: 148.5 (41%)     max: 154 Points
min: 126     avg: 128.3     median: 129 (36%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5925     avg: 5939     median: 5939 (36%)     max: 5953 Points
4258 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 11790     avg: 12432     median: 12432 (9%)     max: 13074 Points
9284 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
463.9 s (5%)
483.5 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
13.1 s (3%)
14 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1889 Points (3%)
1613 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 8785     avg: 9083     median: 9081.5 (5%)     max: 9382 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3333     avg: 3371     median: 3372 (40%)     max: 3406 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
22.6 fps (1%)
19.5 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
117.6 fps (3%)
97.8 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.6 fps (5%)
min: 1.864     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.03 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1439     avg: 1484     median: 1485 (10%)     max: 1528 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.846     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 0.852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5158 Points (11%)
3755 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.5 s (2%)
12.5 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.2 s (1%)
29 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
638 s (3%)
730 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4140     avg: 4266     median: 4267.5 (11%)     max: 4389 Points
min: 3653     avg: 3758     median: 3772 (9%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
38409 Points (31%)
min: 40774     avg: 42358     median: 41370 (34%)     max: 45919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
37436 Points (30%)
min: 39108     avg: 41332     median: 41308 (34%)     max: 43602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46756     avg: 47727     median: 47726.5 (38%)     max: 48697 Points
min: 44389     avg: 48213     median: 48111 (39%)     max: 52242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3578     avg: 3929     median: 4087 (10%)     max: 4123 Points
min: 3321     avg: 3335     median: 3329 (8%)     max: 3362 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5322     avg: 5678     median: 5779 (10%)     max: 5934 Points
min: 4743     avg: 4930     median: 4867 (9%)     max: 5241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1806 Points (8%)
min: 1509     avg: 1536     median: 1541 (6%)     max: 1553 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1033 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
2004 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 770     avg: 803     median: 796.5 (27%)     max: 847 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1604     avg: 1661     median: 1651.5 (3%)     max: 1736 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
995 Points (4%)
min: 823     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (4%)     max: 830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2096 Points (7%)
min: 1529     avg: 1649     median: 1649 (5%)     max: 1769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4090     avg: 4210     median: 4118 (41%)     max: 4421 Points
min: 3366     avg: 3562     median: 3562 (36%)     max: 3758 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7780     avg: 8031     median: 7859 (8%)     max: 8455 Points
min: 6553     avg: 7143     median: 7143 (7%)     max: 7733 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4001 Points (44%)
3626 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7471 Points (10%)
7237 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6870     avg: 7287     median: 7420 (13%)     max: 7572 Points
6922 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3350     avg: 3389     median: 3360 (44%)     max: 3457 Points
3282 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7690 Points (12%)
7496 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3559 Points (53%)
3673 Points (55%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6013 Points (32%)
7535 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5907 Points (41%)
5586 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
8016 Points (16%)
9447 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8204 Points (17%)
7540 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7459 Points (20%)
7816 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1252     avg: 1283     median: 1283 (2%)     max: 1314 ms
min: 1185     avg: 1243     median: 1205.5 (1%)     max: 1374 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 97     avg: 104.9     median: 104.9 (1%)     max: 112.7 ms
130.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 28265     avg: 28829     median: 28828.5 (19%)     max: 29392 Points
23991 Points (16%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 137     avg: 142.3     median: 139 (25%)     max: 154 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
17.2 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-8145U → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3200U → 92% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 13. 04:44:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10118 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11191 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765597469s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:18:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10118 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 10118 +0.011s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11191 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 11191 +0.01s ... 0.032s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.072s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)