Intel Core i5-520M vs Intel Core i5-480M

Intel Core i5-520M

► remove Intel 520M

The Intel Core i5-520M is a dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.4 to 2.93 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7-620M, the 520M features only 3 MB Level 3 Cache and a lower clock speed (CPU and GPU).

A feature of the new Core i5-520M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the i5 520M is on average faster than a Core 2 Duo T9500 and due to the Turbo Boost, single threaded applications run even better. Therefore, the Core i5-520M is as fast as high clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs and should handle most gaming and multimedia tasks well.

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 more likely uses the TDP under load than the older Core 2 Duo CPUs. Without any load, the i5 uses noticable less power.

Intel Core i5-480M

► remove Intel 480M

The Intel Core i5-480M is a mid-range dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.66 to 2.9 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i5-540M, the 480M does most likely not support AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions and features a slower Turbo Boost (2.9 versus 3.06 GHz). However, the base clock rate is slightly higher.

A feature of the new Core i5-480M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-480M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-480M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core i5-520MIntel Core i5-480M
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
ArrandaleArrandale
: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Core i5-580M (compare)2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M (compare)2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M (compare)2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M (compare)2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M (compare)2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M (compare)2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM (compare)1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM (compare)1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM (compare)1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM (compare)1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM (compare)1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M (compare)2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M (compare)2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M (compare)2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M (compare)2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M (compare)2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M (compare)2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM (compare)1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM (compare)1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM (compare)1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM (compare)1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM (compare)1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
2400 - 2933 MHz2666 - 2933 MHz
25002400
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
35 35
382+177 382+177
32 32
81+114 mm281+114 mm2
105 °C105 °C
BGA1288, PGA988BGA1288, PGA988
Turbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 733MHz,integrated DDR3 memory controller, GMA HD Graphics (500-766MHz), MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S, 4.1, 3.2), EM64T, VT-x
$225 U.S.
Intel Core i5 520MIntel Core i5 480M

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
520M +
min: 1.97     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (8%)     max: 2.19 Points
106%
480M +
min: 2.18     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (9%)     max: 2.37 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
520M +
min: 2789     avg: 3017.3     median: 3046 (33%)     max: 3102 Points
105%
480M +
min: 3130     avg: 3192.3     median: 3191 (35%)     max: 3248 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
520M +
min: 6114     avg: 6660.8     median: 6753 (14%)     max: 6925 Points
105%
480M +
min: 6939     avg: 7187.4     median: 7080 (14%)     max: 7553 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
520M +
min: 7129     avg: 8021.6     median: 8165 (11%)     max: 8342 Points
105%
480M +
min: 8159     avg: 8557.7     median: 8556 (11%)     max: 8969 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
520M +
min: 1799     avg: 3636.1     median: 3732 (36%)     max: 3957 Points
105%
480M +
min: 3831     avg: 3927.9     median: 3912 (38%)     max: 4030 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
520M +
min: 599     avg: 813.7     median: 623.5 (7%)     max: 1427.83 seconds
101%
480M +
min: 539     avg: 563.8     median: 556.6 (7%)     max: 600.245 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
520M +
min: 19     avg: 26.6     median: 20 (4%)     max: 44.633 seconds
100%
480M +
min: 17     avg: 18     median: 18 (4%)     max: 19.19 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
520M +
min: 2602     avg: 2726.4     median: 2727 (19%)     max: 2817 Points
108%
480M +
min: 2579     avg: 2879.9     median: 2954 (21%)     max: 3093 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - Standard 1280x1024
100%
520M +
2724 Points (65%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - Standard 1280x768 1280x768
100%
520M +
2785 Points (91%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
520M +
min: 15     avg: 16.7     median: 16 (3%)     max: 24 Seconds
100%
480M +
min: 15     avg: 15     median: 15 (3%)     max: 15.2 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
520M +
min: 36     avg: 38.4     median: 38 (2%)     max: 44 Seconds
100%
480M +
min: 35     avg: 36.1     median: 36 (2%)     max: 37 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
520M +
min: 848     avg: 898.9     median: 871 (4%)     max: 1182 Seconds
100%
480M +
min: 842     avg: 852.3     median: 851 (4%)     max: 866 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
520M +
min: 31600     avg: 34552.9     median: 33240 (16%)     max: 39000 MIPS
115%
480M +
min: 33210     avg: 38100     median: 38100 (18%)     max: 42990 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
520M +
min: 25360     avg: 28514.3     median: 28250 (22%)     max: 35320 MFLOPS
105%
480M +
min: 29000     avg: 29750     median: 29750 (23%)     max: 30500 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
100%
520M +
8082 Points (51%)
7718 Points (48%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
520M +
min: 5.2     avg: 6.6     median: 6.7 (86%)     max: 6.8 points
103%
480M +
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 points
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
520M +
min: 7304     avg: 7540.4     median: 7560 (13%)     max: 7658 Points
104%
480M +
min: 7113     avg: 7764.5     median: 7845 (13%)     max: 8255 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
480M +
min: 2640     avg: 2744     median: 2741 (15%)     max: 2854 points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-520M → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-480M → 103%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)