Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-2450M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

Intel Core i5-2450M

► remove from comparison Intel 2450M

The Intel Core i5-2450M is a fast dual core processor that first appeared in Dell laptops in 11/2011. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7, the i5 offers a smaller last level cache of 3MB. The base clock speed is 2.5 GHz but due to Turbo Boost it can reach 2.8 GHz (2 cores active) and 3.1 GHz (1 core active). Compared to the 2510M, the 2450M does not support VT-d and Trusted Execution functions. However, the integrated gpu offers a higher Turbo Boost clock rate.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo Boost 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. 

The i5-2450M offers an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2435M it is clocked with  650 or 1300MHz (with Turbo Boost).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture and the new Turbo Boost 2.0, the average performance of the Core i5-2450M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. Looking at benchmarks of slower clocked Core i5 CPUs, the i5-2450M should position itself slightly above the old Core i5-620M and is therefore suited even for demanding tasks.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 is an entry level dual core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock speed of 2 GHz. The performance should be sufficient for office and other casual tasks but high level gaming and HD video editing for example could be limited by the CPU performance.

ModelIntel Core i5-2450MIntel Core 2 Duo T6400
CodenameSandy BridgePenryn
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core 2 Duo
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i5-2540M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2520M compare2.5 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2450M « 2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2435M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2430M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2415M compare2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2410M compare2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2557M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2467M compare1.6 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2537M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2500 - 3100 MHz2000 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors624 Million
Technology32 nm45 nm
Die Size149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketPPGA988PGA478
FeaturesHD Graphics 3000, DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), IDA (Intel Dynamic Acceleration)
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$225 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 2450M +
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (4%)     max: 2.8 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 2450M +
min: 1.19     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (28%)     max: 1.2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3830     avg: 3912     median: 3918.5 (24%)     max: 3989 Points
min: 2082     avg: 2115     median: 2115 (13%)     max: 2154 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 8273     avg: 8507     median: 8542 (6%)     max: 8619 Points
min: 3704     avg: 3963     median: 4005 (3%)     max: 4078 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 2450M +
min: 9868     avg: 10292     median: 10318.5 (7%)     max: 10518 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 2450M +
min: 4664     avg: 4835     median: 4847 (6%)     max: 4922 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 547     avg: 604     median: 606.5 (7%)     max: 655 s
1249 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 17.7     avg: 18.9     median: 19 (4%)     max: 19.46 s
39.4 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 2450M +
min: 2529     avg: 2849     median: 2848.5 (5%)     max: 3168 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 2450M +
min: 14.01     avg: 14.6     median: 14.6 (0%)     max: 15.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 2450M +
min: 76.6     avg: 78.7     median: 78.7 (2%)     max: 80.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 2450M +
min: 0.124     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.133 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 2450M +
min: 0.192     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.235 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 2450M +
1.4 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2830     avg: 3384     median: 3441.5 (7%)     max: 3475 Points
min: 1711     avg: 1764     median: 1767.5 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 12.96     avg: 13     median: 13 (3%)     max: 13.2 s
min: 26     avg: 28.8     median: 26.5 (6%)     max: 34 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 29     avg: 29.6     median: 29.8 (1%)     max: 30.38 s
min: 61     avg: 64     median: 64 (3%)     max: 67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 671     avg: 689     median: 687 (3%)     max: 707 s
min: 1368     avg: 1532     median: 1531.5 (7%)     max: 1695 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 49000     avg: 53208     median: 52850 (25%)     max: 58130 MIPS
min: 18396     avg: 18438     median: 18437.5 (9%)     max: 18479 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 34340     avg: 34720     median: 34490 (26%)     max: 35560 MFLOPS
min: 14630     avg: 14670     median: 14670 (11%)     max: 14710 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T6400 +
min: 4479     avg: 5038     median: 4916 (10%)     max: 6001 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T6400 +
4.9 Points (70%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 2450M +
min: 7     avg: 7     median: 7 (90%)     max: 7.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 9078     avg: 9278     median: 9300 (7%)     max: 9384 Points
3909 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 2450M +
min: 2948     avg: 3530     median: 3521 (9%)     max: 3886 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2450M → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 → 46% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 17. 02:10:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3001 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 454 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765933844s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3001 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 3001 +0.019s ... 0.024s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 454 +0.001s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 454 +0.012s ... 0.036s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.051s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)