Notebookcheck

Review Asus N82JQ Notebook

Sebastian Jentsch, 11/14/2010

14 + 4. Quad core power in 14 inches, combined with a strong Nvidia GT 335M and USB 3.0. Will power users find the perfect desktop replacement with this? Find out why the high-end 14 incher only achieves 83% in our review.

ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: Compact power machine with Core i7-720QM and Nvidia GeForce 335M
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: Compact power machine with Core i7-720QM and Nvidia GeForce 335M

Notebook buyers approach choosing a device with the most various needs. A simple office model without many bells and whistles suffices home users who want to surf on the internet. They will likely only look at the mobility factors, like matt display, battery life and workmanship, in reviews.

Performance orientated buyers consider additional factors. Strong graphics for gaming, just like a quad core processor from Intel's 2010 CPU generation is a must have. But if the device costs as much as 900 euro, then it has to be a good looker, too.

The 14 inch Asus N82JQ-VX046V seems to be exactly such a notebook. Core i7-720QM and GeForce GT 335M keep the power upright and structured aluminum surfaces provide the optical accents. An elegant but nevertheless strong machine for 900 euro? Find out everything about the benefits, but also about the drawbacks of the Asus N82JQ.

Case

High-end aluminum lid
High-end aluminum lid
Compact & heavy case
Compact & heavy case
Coherent details (power button)
Coherent details (power button)

The 14 incher doesn't have a slim silhouette and the N82JQ can't hold a candle to a slim Acer TimelineX. It doesn't have to, either. In view of its high performance, potential buyers will gladly accept its 2414 grams and the fairly high base unit.

Users will have delight in the high-end surfaces of lid and case, though. The matt, respectively slightly glossy surfaces make a desktop suitable, and at the same time elegant, impression. The N82JQ is thus suitable for mannerly customer contact on the one hand and for a bit of showing off among friends on the other

We can only twist the chassis the slightest bit when considerable force is applied by both hands. Wrist-rest and touchpad prove to be solid. The wrist-rest and the key area have a rubber finish (special coating). Thus, your hands can rest fairly secure and fingerprints are almost non-existent. Our hands feel comfortable on the dull and very wide surface.

The base unit's plate presents a matt, grippy plastic. The surfaces are solid. Merely pressure on the drive can provoke denting. There are two maintenance covers. The front one is for the 2.5 inch hard disk, the one in the center for both RAM modules.

The hinges have a secure grip on the lid and don't tend to teeter. The maximum opening angle of circa 130 degrees is just sufficient for a use on the lap. We only need one hand for opening. The heavy base unit keeps itself on the table.

Connectivity

1 USB 3.0 is installed
1 USB 3.0 is installed

Asus isn't stingy with interfaces and bids a good array of current connections. We find a HDMI out beside the USB 3.0 and VGA on the left. The user can connect a TV set to HDMI for transmitting video and sound. An ExpressCard34 slot is not onboard. Expansions, such as audio cards, memory media or controllers, are thus not possible.

The interfaces are well distributed on both sides. The rarely used eSATA and Ethernet ports (as well as 1 USB 2.0 port) are hidden behind a flap on the right. This provides a cleaned up look when they aren't used.

The position of HDMI and VGA in the front, lateral area adds unwieldy cables on the desk. Under certain circumstances, a leftie mouse might not be usable. If we imagine the N82JQ equipped with a cable tree, we'll see the problem on the left. eSATA, Ethernet and USB cables can be space-savingly led towards the rear on the right. Socket on the rear would have been more practical. However, the lid's mounting prevents ports on the rear.

The cardreader on the N82JQ's front is the only connection there. The 14 incher only has one hot key and it controls the energy modes (high performance, etc.).

Front: Cardreader
Front: Cardreader
Left: AC, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.0, line-out, microphone
Left: AC, VGA, HDMI, USB 3.0, line-out, microphone
Rear: No connections
Rear: No connections
Right: DVD drive, USB 2.0, Ethernet, eSATA/USB combo (under flap).
Right: DVD drive, USB 2.0, Ethernet, eSATA/USB combo (under flap).
Webcam picture in 1600x1200
Webcam picture in 1600x1200

Communication

Beside WLAN draft-n (Atheros AR9285), Bluetooth 2.1+EDR are also inside the N82JQ as wireless technologies. The Atheros AR8131 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet card can transfer data in home networks in the fastest possible speed. The user naturally also needs a draft-n router, respectively a gigabit switch.

Supplies

There are no recovery data carriers for Windows 7 Home Premium (64 bit) included, merely a driver DVD. Thus, N82JQ buyers are prompted to create an according data carrier with the AI Recovery Burner. The LifeFrame software for taking pictures or videos with the webcam is recommendable. As we tried it out, we found out that the camera can take pictures in a high resolution of 1600x1200 pixels. Unfortunately, the webcam is very slow in this resolution and can only take focused still life pictures. The recording frame rate is by an estimated 2-3 picture per second. The rate doesn't get much better in 640x480 with an estimated 5 pictures per second.

The Asus Web Storage (500 GB online storage) typically belongs in the Asus laptop's package. Users can secure their most important files or export data regularly here.

Warranty

Asus grants a 24 month warranty with pickup service (Pickup & Return). The warranty extension by a year, from 2 years to 3 years, is available for 80 euro in online shops. The warranty extension has to be activated within 90 days of date of purchase. The package also extends the international warranty for the same period.

Input Devices

Keyboard

Asus uses a so-called isolation keyboard. The separate key are in a high gloss plastic grid, which however can be easily cleaned. Pressed key are on the same height as the glossy surface.

The key's gaps aren't as big as in desktop keyboards. However, because no number pad is used, the layout is sufficient. It could have been much larger though, if the manufacturer had used the entire width and had made the "enter" and "shift" key bigger.

The keyboard's biggest drawback isn't the layout, but rather the unsatisfactory typing feel. The keys provide the typist with a slightly spongy pressure point and a coiling stroke. The latter is caused by the yielding key surface. The sufficient key stroke length can't do anything to make things right anymore, either.

Touchpad

The same texture that adorns the lid's aluminum look is found on the touchpad. The gliding feel on it is fairly dull but not very pleasant. The large pad is sensitive up to its edges and you can navigate on it precisely and fast, despite its poor haptics.

It's a multi-touchpad (Elan Smart-Pad V2.2; driver ELAN 7.0.5.10). However, only scrolling with two fingers is recognized as a gesture (two fingers beside each other). Two finger zooming wasn't possible on the test device. There is no conventional horizontal or vertical scroll bar (one finger use) and you can't activate it, either. The keys only have a sufficient stroke length at the outer areas and have a bright click noise. Thus, the click feedback isn't perfect, but at most average.

Keyboard
Keyboard
Number pad
Number pad
Touchpad
Touchpad

Display

The reflective LED screen (AUO B140XW01 V8) has a resolution of 1366x768 pixels (16:9). The coarse WXGA resolution is standard in 14 inchers. The determined black value is 1.32 cd/m2 (contrast 180:1). The widescreen display thus doesn't present black as deep black, as it should be the case for a perfect TFT. A gray cast remains visible and isn't improved by the display's color friendly glare type finish.

Low contrasts are typical for office notebooks, all-rounders and netbooks. For a gaming suitable device of this price category, a higher quality screen would have been appropriate. The display isn't acceptable for professionals in the picture and video editing field. The color spectrum is far from the often used Adobe RGB 1998 (t). The same applies for RGB (t). Consequently, an average screen is used in view of color representation.

ASUS N82JQ-VX046V vs. AdobeRGB (t)
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V vs. AdobeRGB (t)
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V vs. sRGB (t)
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V vs. sRGB (t)
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V vs. Dell StudioXPS 16 (t)
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V vs. Dell StudioXPS 16 (t)

However, the LED display has two positive qualities. It distributes the brightness very evenly over the screen (98%). The maximum rate of 241 cd/m2 and the minimum rate of 236 cd/m2 are extremely close. Such a homogeneous illumination is very rare in notebooks. The average brightness of 238 cd/m2 is also above average of our test notebooks. The user rarely needs a luminance beyond 180 cd/m2 indoors. So, many will reduce the brightness because the display is otherwise too bright.

238
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Information
Gossen Mavo-Monitor
Maximum: 241 cd/m²
Average: 238.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 238 cd/m²
Black: 1.32 cd/m²
Contrast: 180:1

The 14 incher's screen is rather unsuitable for outdoor use despite the good brightness. Its glare quality causes reflections and impairs the view depending on the light incidence. The users are then forced to adjust the viewing angles. We only had a very cloudy, rainy day for taking our sample pictures. The view isn't impaired due to weak sunlight here.

Lateral view, overcast
Lateral view, overcast
Lateral view, overcast
Lateral view, overcast
Frontal view, overcast
Frontal view, overcast

The N82JQ's viewing angles prove to be very narrow. When the sight deviates upwards or downwards (vertical), ghosting turns up at 20 degrees. We can deviate up to 45 degrees from the center towards the left and right (horizontal). The colors first invert evidently then.

Several people gathered in front of the N82JQ will have problems finding a good view on the display content at the same time. This critique point haunts the majority of office and multimedia notebooks. Good displays are scarce commodities.

Viewing angles: Asus N82JQ-VX046V
Viewing angles: Asus N82JQ-VX046V

Performance

Asus equips the N82JQ with a Core i7-720QM (4 x 1.6 GHz). It has a 256 KB Level 1 cache and a 6 MB Level 3 cache per core. The TDP is a high 45 watts. The Arrandale 32nm CPU can calculate on four physical cores with 1.60 GHz each. This low nominal rate can clock between 1.60 and 2.80 GHz in operation (Intel Turbo Boost).

Whilst applications always have the exact amount of performance that they need with Turbo Boost, not all eight threads (4 + Hyperthreading) can compute with 2.80 GHz, but rather with 8 x 1.2 GHz. When only two cores are used, the clock rate of these is 2 x 2.5 GHz, for example. Only when one core takes over the entire calculation effort can its clock rate climb to the mentioned 2.80 GHz. This is a rarely achieved case in practical use, though.

The Core i7-720QM is supported by a whole 4096 MB of RAM (PC3-10600). They are placed on two Hynix RAM modules. Unlike Core i3 and i5 processors, the i7-720QM's bundle doesn't incorporate Intel HD graphics. For this reason, Nvidia's Optimus can't be used. An Nvidia GeForce GT 335M works as the only graphics core on the Intel HM55 chip set. You'll find more about their performance in the section "Gaming Performance".

System info CPUZ CPU
System info CPUZ Cache
System info CPUZ Mainboard
System info CPUZ RAM
System info CPUZ RAM SPD
System info GPUZ
DPC Latency Checker: Idle - It looks easy going,
DPC Latency Checker: but suddenly there are massive latencies
DPC Latency Checker: WLAN on/off no latencies
 
System information: Asus N82JQ-VX046V
Configuration
Configuration

The 720QM should be able to cope perfectly with single core and multi core applications, viz. process calculations quickly, due to the maximum turbo rate of 2.8 GHz. The processing speed can be compared synthetically with the Cinebench R11.5 CPU benchmark. The CPU score is 2.82 points here, which represents the typical rate of a 720QM system. Thus, the N82JQ stands out from an i5-460M (2.3 points) or an i5-520M (2.2 points) evidently

Turbo Boost has to prove itself in Cinebench R10 Single. Here, only one thread (of eight) is demanded to full. We end up with 3622 points (average 720QM systems). The previously inferior i5-520M systems range between 3500 and 3800 points and are thus tendentiously a bit faster. The reason: The 520M has a turbo rate of 2933 GHz. Although the i5-460M used in budget consumer laptops has an identical 2.8 GHz turbo rate, the score of 3850 points (average taken from three test devices), is superior by 6%.

5.9
Windows 7 Experience Index
Processor
Calculations per second
7
Memory (RAM)
Memory operations per second
5.9
Graphics
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
6.5
Gaming graphics
3D business and gaming graphics
6.5
Primary hard disk
Disk data transfer rate
5.9
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2933
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
7981
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
3541
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
3622 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
9901 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
3765 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
17.64 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.82 Points
Help
PC Mark
PCMark 056858 points
PCMark Vantage5266 points
Help

So, multi core calculations are an outstanding strength of the 720QM. Will this lead to a very good system performance, which we determine with PCMark Vantage? In this test, the CPU, graphics, RAM and hard disk collaborate, whereby CPU and hard disk have the most impact.

PCMark Vantage finishes with 5266 points. This result indicates a strong system. However, the rating is lower than in other systems with an i7-720QM. Thus, the Asus G73JH (ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870) achieves 6199 points. The reason for this was the fast rotating 7200 rpm hard disk and the strong graphics.

The i7-720QM provides a very good performance. Nevertheless, our data base shows that even a 13.3 incher, like the Acer Aspire 3820TG, can be stronger. The little subnotebook can accomplish 6001 PCMark Vantage points with its i5-460M, an HD 5650 and a 5400 rpm HDD (75 MB/s sequential read). It's the speedy hard disk that supplies the decisive boost.

3D Mark
3DMark 0319526 points
3DMark 0513782 points
3DMark 06
 1280x1024
6938 points
3DMark Vantage3234 points
Help
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 ST9500325AS
Transfer Rate Minimum: 34.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 80.9 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 62.8 MB/s
Access Time: 18.6 ms
Burst Rate: 58.1 MB/s
CPU Usage: 1 %

The 500 GB hard disk from Seagate (ST9500325AS) has a share in the average PCMark Vantage rating (in relation to 720QM systems). The HDD score is 3251 points (average for 5200 rpm disks). The data throughput in read, determined with HD Tune, is 62.8 MB/s. First fast rotating 7200 rpm HDDs achieve higher throughputs (about 75 MB/s), which can result in, for example, a HDD score of 4077 points (HP G62-130EG) (see CDM chart).

HD Tune 63 MB/s read
HD Tune 63 MB/s read
Seagate ST9500325AS, 500GB, 5400
Seagate ST9500325AS, 500GB, 5400
CDM example 7200 HDD HP G62-130EG 78 MB/s
CDM example 7200 HDD HP G62-130EG 78 MB/s

Gaming Performance

Wie wir testen - Leistung

An Nvidia GeForce GT 335M with a 1024 MB DDR3 memory is installed as the GPU. GPU-Z indicates GDDR3, but graphic card manufacturers typically use the cheaper DDR3. The GPU core has a clock rate of 450 MHz, the memory 790 MHz. It is a DirectX 10.1, shader 4.1 and PhysX supporting GPU that represents a leaner GTS 250M (GT215 core, fewer cores (72) and no GDDR5 support).

The name implies a fast midrange graphics of the previous Nvidia generation. In fact, the GT 335M has been known to be an equal of the ATI HD 5650. However, only few manufacturers have opted for using it in their notebooks. We had it in review in the Alienware M11x subnotebook. Asus still installs the GPU in NX90JQ, K42JV-X1 and N73JN.

3DMark2006 finishes with 6938 points. That is more than a GT 330M (e.g. Samsung R580 Hawk with a Core i5-520M) can stem: 6412 3DMarks. 3DMark2006 is an indication, but will it show us the i7-720QM and GT 335M combination's real gaming power? We've executed two gaming tests.

StarCraft 2

The real-time strategy game is famous for its requirement of a good multi core processor. The GPU support however shouldn't be too weak, either. The combination at hand appears to be just right for playing smoothly with 30.6 fps in high details (1360x768). A strong HD 5650 system (Aspire 3820TG, i5-460M) reaches 29 fps.

The N82JQ only supplies an unplayable 16 fps in maximum details and Full HD (external TFT). The Aspire 3820TG equipped with an i5-460M (13.3 inch, HD 5650) achieves 17 fps. The comparison with the 3820TG proves that it's not absolutely necessary to have a quad core processor for perfect game play.

StarCraft 2
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080ultra16.1 fps
 1360x768high30.6 fps
 1360x768medium45.4 fps
 1024x768low164 fps
Fifa 2011, 1366x768, high, 98 fps
Fifa 2011, 1366x768, high, 98 fps

Fifa 2011

The football game has only recently found its way into the gaming benchmarks. It's suitable for weak graphic solutions, the like of HD 5470, due to its low hardware requirements. The installed GT 335M thus supplies a perfectly smooth 98 fps even in high details (1360x768). This even has enough elbowroom for an externally connected Full HD TFT. An ATI HD 5650 is 27% slower than the present N82JQ in average of all test systems. The TravelMate 7740G-434G50Mnss (i5-430M) for example achieves 80 fps.

Fifa 11
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1360x768high, 2xAA, 0xAF98.2 fps
 1024x768medium, 0xAA, 0xAF153 fps
 800x600low, 0xAA, 0xAF308 fps

Gaming Verdict

The Nvidia GT 335M achieves exactly that in the games, what we miss time and again in the mainstream model, GT 330M: The popular ATI HD 5650's performance level is met. Even the one or other additional frame in some games could be extracted due to the quad core processor's influence (Fifa 2011). However, StarCraft 2 proves that an Intel quad core CPU isn't absolutely necessary for perfect game play.

low med.high ultra
Call of Juarez Benchmark (2006) 17.3fps
StarCraft 2 (2010) 16445.430.616.1fps
Fifa 11 (2010) 30815398.2fps

Emissions

Air outlet
Air outlet

System Noise

Ergonomics aren't one of the N82JQ's special strengths. But not its major weakness, either. The fan's noise is always existent, no matter if in idle or under load. The fan never turns itself off. It whirs constantly and its level never sinks below 33.2 dB(A). Therefore it drowns out the hard disk's quiet clacking without ado.

Based on an already idle level, sporadic processing tasks (internet surfing, moving small documents, opening Excel) cause the fan speed to increase to about 35 dB(A). When the processor has to calculate with all eight threads (multi core, Prime95), the fan rises to a very audible 40.7 dB(A). If a FurMark is added at the same time (100% GPU capacity) the N82JQ extracts everything out of the revolutions: 48.4 dB(A). This varying volume that is reached reminds us of gaming laptops. The highest speed isn't constant. It's only kept upright for 30 seconds, fluctuating as of 42.4 dB(A).

Noise Level

Idle 33.2 / 34.3 / 35.3 dB(A)
HDD 33 dB(A)
DVD 36.2 / dB(A)
Load 37 / 48.4 dB(A)
 
    30 dB
silent
40 dB
audible
50 dB
loud
 
min: , med: , max:    Voltcraft 320 (15 cm distance)
Stress test: CPU max. 90 degrees
Stress test: CPU max. 90 degrees

Temperature

The measurement under high load (stress test) determined up to 44 degrees on the top. This provides warm fingers on the keyboard's left half. The center bottom reached 40.5 degrees. The bottom reaches an average temperature of 32 degrees during a scenario of word processing and web surfing. The wrist-rest stays in an acceptable range of about 27 to 33 degrees.

The CPU temperature increased to a maximum of 90 degrees during the stress test. The GPU settled to 82 degrees. Due to Prime95's activity, all eight threads ran with 1.63 GHz (hardly any fluctuations).

Max. Load
 37.8 °C36.3 °C30.6 °C 
 43.6 °C43.2 °C32 °C 
 33.8 °C38.5 °C31.5 °C 
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 36.4 °C
27.3 °C37.5 °C47.2 °C
27 °C40.7 °C39.2 °C
27.1 °C35.4 °C36.6 °C
Maximum: 47.2 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  67.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-360
Exaggerated sound promises on the product's website
Exaggerated sound promises on the product's website

Speakers

The stereo speakers are located underneath the wrist-rest. They emit their sound towards the table top and hands on the laptop impair the sound. Hi-fi fans will find the sound to be an insult for the ears and grab headphones strickenly.  The manufacturer heralds "Splendid Super Sonic Multimedia Enjoyment" on its website. Super Sonic stands for acoustic high-performance by Asus. SonicMaster models, such as Asus' N71JV, N53JF (Nvidia 415M) or N73JG (Nvidia 425M), have proven to have a very good sound. But, the N82JQ in front of us definitely doesn't belong to them.

The sound is adequate for office, but not more. The speakers extremely emphasizes the trebles and only captures a part of the midranges.  Low pitches are completely neglected. Thus, the sound is very thin and not recommendable for listening to music. The maximum volume is adequate, but not particularly strong. Demanding users will connect an external solution in any event. We test the 3.5mm audio jack with two Yamaha speakers (YST-M20SDP). The volume tethered to the notebook doesn't emit an audible static noise (audio test only, no measurement).

Battery Life

How much battery life is appropriate for a quad core 14 incher? Dell's Studio 1557 (164 minutes, 56 Wh, 15.6 inch) and Toshiba's Qosmio X500-121 (168 minutes, 87 Wh, 18.4 inch) prove that three hours are Utopian with a 45 watt CPU (TDP).

However, that our N82JQ only manages two hours with its 63 Wh battery (4400 mAh) is upsetting (WLAN test, 125 minutes). We reduced the brightness to 100 cd/m2 and selected the energy mode, Battery Saving.

The high idle energy requirement is shown in the idle test: It's as dead as stone after only 195 minutes (3:15 hours). This time is however unrealistic in real-life (lowest brightness, disabled wireless modules, CPU idle). The short battery life only grants enough movie entertainment time for a short movie on the train. DVD playback comes to an end after 1:48 hours (108 minutes).

Recharging: 120 min
Recharging: 120 min
WLAN: 125 min.
WLAN: 125 min.
DVD: 108 min
DVD: 108 min
Idle: 195 min.
Idle: 195 min.
Load: 66 min.
Load: 66 min.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
3h 15min
WiFi Surfing
2h 05min
DVD
1h 48min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 06min

The short battery runtimes nourish the suspicion of a high power consumption. The mulitmeter confirms this. The N82JQ needs a minimum of 19.1 watts (idle, maximum energy savings). The CPU doesn't downclock when the energy settings are on "High Performance" (wireless modules enabled, maximum brightness) in idle. Thus, the power consumption climbs to a steep 31.2 watts.

In comparison: The Sony Vaio EB3Z1E (15.5 inch, i5-460M, HD 5650) in review at the same time only needs 13.5 watts in idle. The Vaio EB3 doesn't have a graphics card that can be turned on and off. In return, it has a CPU with a TDP of only 35 instead of 45 watts).

If the Core i7-720QM and GT 335M now compute with full power (stress test for both), the effective power increases to 111 watts. Such a high power consumption won't be reached in 3D games, as shown by the assessment during 3DMark06: 77.5 watts. The multimeter shows 80.8 watts in a pure CPU stress test (Prime95, 8 x 1.63 GHz).

The 90 watt adapter is absolutely overburdened in view of the maximum possible consumption. There is a discrepancy of over 30 watts. The 67.5 degree hot adapter proves this during the stress test. The system however neither crashed nor were there any other irregularities during the stress test of several hours (CPU: max. 90 degrees).

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Idle 19.1 / 23.7 / 31.2 Watt
Load 77.5 / 111.2 Watt
 
Key: min: , med: , max:         Voltcraft VC 960

Verdict

ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: Little mobility but powerful
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: Little mobility but powerful

The Asus N82JQ is a potent 14 incher with a strong Intel Core i7 quad core CPU. The combination of a strong midrange GPU and the Nvidia GeForce GT 335M makes the laptop suitable for gaming. The 3D performance is about on par with an ATI HD 5650.

Multimedia fans won't be disappointed in view of the interfaces, including (1) USB 3.0, HDMI, eSATA, Gigabit LAN and draft-n WLAN. The same users will complain about the contrast and color poor glare type display that doesn't have stable viewing angles (1366x768). At least the WXGA screen has a good and even brightness.

We can only praise the 14 incher in terms of workmanship and haptics. The base unit and lid surface is solid. The rubber coated work surface feels nice and the pattern on the aluminum lid looks elegant. Unfortunately, the key's poor feedback doesn't fit in this high-end concept (including mouse pad).

The battery life of 2:05 hours in WLAN surfing is disappointing. That is due to the 720QM's typically high idle power consumption and low battery capacity: 63 Wh, 4400 mAh. However, you'll have to accept this because there aren't any alternatives with 14 inches - that is, if it has to be an Intel quad core device. The step to 15.6 or 16 inches discloses vast quad core options. See: "The competition". The Asus N82 is available for starting at about 949 euro at various online retailers.

ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: Quad core i7 meets strong Nvidia GT 335M
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: Quad core i7 meets strong Nvidia GT 335M
By courtesy of ...
In Review: Asus N82JQ-VX046V, with courtesy of:
In Review:  Asus N82JQ-VX046V

Specifications

Asus N82JQ-VX046V

:: Processor
:: Mainboard
Intel HM55
:: Memory
4096 MB, PC3-10600
:: Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M - 1024 MB, Core: 450 MHz, Memory: 790 MHz, GDDR3, ForceWare 189.16
:: Display
14 inch 16:9, 1366x768 pixel, AUO B140XW01 V8, glossy: yes
:: Harddisk
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 ST9500325AS, 500 GB 5400 rpm
:: Soundcard
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Ibex Peak PCH
:: Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 eSata, Audio Connections: line-out, microphone, Card Reader: SD/miniSD/MMC/MS/MS Pro/MS Duo/MS Pro Duo/xD,
:: Networking
Atheros AR8131 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10MBit), Atheros AR9285 Wireless Network Adapter (b g n ), 2.1+EDR Bluetooth
:: Optical drive
TSSTcorp CDDVDW TS-L633C
:: Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 35 x 345 x 243
:: Weight
2.414 kg Power Supply: 0.36 kg
:: Battery
63 Wh Lithium-Ion, 14.4V 4400mAh
:: Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
:: Additional features
Webcam: 1600x1200, 24 Months Warranty

 

[+] compare
The manufacturer positions the N82JQ as a compact entertainment machine.
The manufacturer positions the N82JQ as a compact entertainment machine.
The cardreader on the front reads many formats, incl. xD and MS Pro.
The cardreader on the front reads many formats, incl. xD and MS Pro.
The Altec Lansing loudspeakers are a torture for the ears (treble prone).
The Altec Lansing loudspeakers are a torture for the ears (treble prone).
The 63 Wh, lithium ion battery keeps the 14 incher upright
The 63 Wh, lithium ion battery keeps the 14 incher upright
for just only two hours of WLAN surfing.
for just only two hours of WLAN surfing.
Its capacity of 4,400 mAh is too low for the N82JQ's high power consumption.
Its capacity of 4,400 mAh is too low for the N82JQ's high power consumption.
The battery can be removed for stationary use (no feet).
The battery can be removed for stationary use (no feet).
Maintenance covers grant access to the DDR3 RAM modules (2 slots)
Maintenance covers grant access to the DDR3 RAM modules (2 slots)
and the 2.5 inch SATA hard disk.
and the 2.5 inch SATA hard disk.
The latter is undamped in the case.
The latter is undamped in the case.
The 90 watt adapter heated up to 67.5 degrees in the stress test.
The 90 watt adapter heated up to 67.5 degrees in the stress test.
This is the first sign of overburdening
This is the first sign of overburdening
because the N82JQ drains 111 watts from the mains during the stress test.
because the N82JQ drains 111 watts from the mains during the stress test.
The department for accessories reports: Merely a driver DVD, a cleaning cloth and a quick guide.
The department for accessories reports: Merely a driver DVD, a cleaning cloth and a quick guide.
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: An eye-catcher with its high-end looks and haptics.
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: An eye-catcher with its high-end looks and haptics.
The interfaces are hidden on the right behind a flap.
The interfaces are hidden on the right behind a flap.
just like eSATA for fast hard disks.
just like eSATA for fast hard disks.
A Core i7-720QM with four cores does its job in the heavy but solid case.
A Core i7-720QM with four cores does its job in the heavy but solid case.
The bulky base unit has to additionally cool a strong GeForce GT 330M.
The bulky base unit has to additionally cool a strong GeForce GT 330M.
If the 2.4 kilogram heavy 14 incher can provide a good battery life
If the 2.4 kilogram heavy 14 incher can provide a good battery life
is already dubious with the 45 watt strong Core i7 TDP.
is already dubious with the 45 watt strong Core i7 TDP.
The N82JQ keeps up with strong Core i5 & HD 5650 systems in performance.
The N82JQ keeps up with strong Core i5 & HD 5650 systems in performance.
Asus has set up a high-quality case.
Asus has set up a high-quality case.
The aluminum applications above the keys
The aluminum applications above the keys
complements the subtle illumination (power key)
complements the subtle illumination (power key)
and continues its pattern on the cleanly punched aluminum lid.
and continues its pattern on the cleanly punched aluminum lid.
The included cleaning cloth will hardly ever be used.
The included cleaning cloth will hardly ever be used.
The hinges fit very tight on the base unit
The hinges fit very tight on the base unit
and keep the lid firmly in position.
and keep the lid firmly in position.
The webcam is a small highlight: It shoots still images with 1600x1200 pixels (1.9 MP).
The webcam is a small highlight: It shoots still images with 1600x1200 pixels (1.9 MP).
A blue USB 3.0 is installed,
A blue USB 3.0 is installed,
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: 3D performance on a high HD 5650 level with the Nvidia GT 335M.
ASUS N82JQ-VX046V: 3D performance on a high HD 5650 level with the Nvidia GT 335M.

Similar Notebooks

Devices with the same GPU

» Review Alienware M11x R2 Subnotebook
Core i5 520UM, 11.6", 1.99 kg
» Review Asus N82JV Notebook
Core i7 620M, 14.0", 2.3 kg
» Test Preview – Alienware M11x Performance Check
Core 2 Duo SU7300, 11.6", 2.03 kg
» Review Alienware M11x Subnotebook
Core 2 Duo SU7300, 11.6", 2.03 kg

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

» Dell Inspiron 14-7437 FHD Ultrabook Review Update
HD Graphics 4400, Core i7 4510U
» Lenovo Y40-59423035 Notebook Review
Radeon R9 M275, Core i7 4500U

Links

Compare Prices

Pro

+Good, even brightness
+Haptically high-end
+Strong performance
+Good 3D performance
+High resolution webcam
+USB 3.0 & eSATA
 

Cons

-Short battery life
-High power consumption
-Low contrast
-TFT not AR coated
-Moderate viewing angles
-Very loud under load
-High weight
-Spongy keyboard
-Mouse pad without scroll bar
-Sound treble prone
-Overburdened / hot adapter

Shortcut

What we like

A compact, solid and haptically pleasant base unit. Our hands feel comfortable on the rubbery surface.

What we miss

Now, an anti-reflective and viewing angle stable display. Then the desktop replacement would be perfect.

What surprises us

The Nvidia GT 335M catches up with the ATI HD 5650. Why is this GPU so rare?

The competitors

Intel quad cores in 15 inches: Acer Aspire Ethos 5943G; Aspire 5942G; Aspire 5745DG; ASUS G51JX; ASUS G53JW; Fujitsu Celsius Mobile H700; HP EliteBook 8540w; HP Pavilion dv6-3017sg (XD252EA), Lenovo ThinkPad W510, Lenovo IdeaPad Y560, MSI GT640-i7247W7P; Toshiba Satellite A665-13V

HD 5650 gamers smaller than 15.6 inches: Acer Aspire TimelineX 3820TG: 13.3 inch gamers with HD 5650; Aspire 4820TG: Sister model in 14 inches; HP Envy 14-0028de (XE655EA): strong i5-560M

Nvidia alternatives with GT 330M: Sony Vaio VPC-Z12 or Z13; 13.3 inch: Sony Vaio VPC-CW2S1E/B: 14.1 inch

Rating

Asus N82JQ-VX046V
12/03/2010 v2
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
82%
Pointing Device
74%
Connectivity
70%
Weight
82%
Battery
69%
Display
72%
Games Performance
80%
Application Performance
89%
Temperature
80%
Noise
75%
Add Points
87%
Average
79%
80%
Multimedia *
Weighted Average

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Review Asus N82JQ Notebook
Author: Sebastian Jentsch, 2010-11-14 (Update: 2013-06- 6)