Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G68 MP5 vs ARM Mali-G52 MP1

ARM Mali-G68 MP5

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP5

The ARM Mali-G68 MP5 (or G68MC5) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP5 version uses five of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced early 2023 in the Samsung Exynos 1380 SoC. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

ARM Mali-G52 MP1

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP1

The ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (or G52MC1) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based Tablets). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek MT8168 with a clock speed of up to 800 MHz.

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek MT8168) is clearly below the G52 MP2 version in the entry level. That means its not well suited for demanding 3D Android games like PUBG Mobile.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

show full text
ARM Mali-G68 MP5ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhallBifrost
Pipelines5 - unified1 - unified
Shared Memorynono
technology5 nm12 nm
Date of Announcement14.09.2021 29.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Mali-G68 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 13808 x 2000 MHz? MHz950 MHz
CPU in Mali-G52 MP1GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC T6128 x 1800 MHz614 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 8508 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
JLQ JR5108 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek MT81684 x 2000 MHz? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz800 - 950 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 13089     avg: 14037     median: 13379.5 (2%)     max: 16301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6103     avg: 6217     median: 6224 (27%)     max: 6317 Points
min: 950     avg: 1287     median: 1275 (6%)     max: 2142 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7030     avg: 7122     median: 7134 (16%)     max: 7189 Points
min: 834     avg: 1165     median: 1143.5 (3%)     max: 2001 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4897     avg: 4978     median: 5002 (25%)     max: 5043 Points
min: 605     avg: 893     median: 915 (5%)     max: 1516 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5118     avg: 5208     median: 5233 (16%)     max: 5323 Points
min: 508     avg: 766     median: 787.5 (2%)     max: 1339 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2796     avg: 2911     median: 2955 (1%)     max: 2987 Points
min: 410     avg: 470.6     median: 426 (0%)     max: 716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 799     avg: 1366     median: 832 (1%)     max: 3001 Points
min: 111     avg: 126.7     median: 117 (0%)     max: 181 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (2%)     max: 6 fps
min: 0.6     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 13.4     median: 13 (2%)     max: 14 fps
min: 1.4     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (0%)     max: 3.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 34.4     median: 34 (3%)     max: 35 fps
min: 3.9     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (0%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 30.8     median: 31 (3%)     max: 31 fps
min: 4.2     avg: 5.9     median: 6 (1%)     max: 8.8 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 52.2     median: 52 (1%)     max: 53 fps
min: 6.6     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (0%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (5%)     max: 80 fps
min: 11     avg: 15.6     median: 16 (1%)     max: 26 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP5
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 118     avg: 119     median: 119 (1%)     max: 120 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP1
min: 19     avg: 24.8     median: 24 (0%)     max: 42 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 143857     avg: 147409     median: 148214 (18%)     max: 149350 Points
min: 0     avg: 16041     median: 22462 (3%)     max: 25274 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 41.45     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (0%)     max: 41.92 fps
min: 9.57     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (0%)     max: 15.81 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2971     avg: 3046     median: 3069 (1%)     max: 3098 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 3039     avg: 3083     median: 3102 (1%)     max: 3109 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
12517 Points (13%)
min: 3562     avg: 15210     median: 15410 (15%)     max: 24108 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3997 Points (7%)
min: 1293     avg: 10223     median: 11400 (20%)     max: 16564 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.32     avg: 5.1     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.04 Watt
min: 0     avg: 3.3     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 7.07 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP5 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 40% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
50 56 58 ~ 55 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
43 50 ~ 47 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
36 38 39.7 ~ 38 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G52 MP1:
27.5 29.5 30 32 33 40 56 59 ~ 38 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
103%
Mali-G52 MP1:
19 20 25 28 30 36 39 39 40 ~ 31 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
30  fps
103%
Mali-G52 MP1:
24 37 ~ 31 fps
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
81%
Mali-G52 MP1:
16 17.5 21 27.5 28 29 30 30 30 33 ~ 26 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G52 MP1:
30  fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)

Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)

2017
low 1280x720
Mali-G52 MP1:
19  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G52 MP1:
27  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
60  fps
48%
Mali-G52 MP1:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP5:
60  fps
40%
Mali-G52 MP1:
17 25.5 29 ~ 24 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP5 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 75%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 103%

ARM Mali-G68 MP5lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal58.5
Genshin Impact554738
PUBG Mobile303032
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

2


1
1

1







ARM Mali-G52 MP1lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet38
PUBG Mobile313126
Arena of Valor30
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)19
Asphalt 8: Airborne27
Asphalt 9: Legends2924
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		3
2


1

2
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 10:32:34

#0 checking url part for id 11584 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10459 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:36:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.106s ... 0.107s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.107s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.107s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11584 +0.028s ... 0.135s

#8 got single benchmarks 11584 +0.014s ... 0.15s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10459 +0.002s ... 0.151s

#10 got single benchmarks 10459 +0.036s ... 0.188s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.188s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.125s ... 0.312s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.312s

#14 Got 57 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.33s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.33s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.334s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.019s ... 0.354s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.354s

#19 return log +0.039s ... 0.392s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)