Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-9900T vs Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Core i9-9900T

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900T

The Intel Core i9-9900T is a high end power efficient desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. Compared to the similar named top model Core i9-9900K, the 9900T offers lower clock speeds (2.1 - 4.4 GHz versus 3.6 - 5 GHz) and a reduced TDP of 35 versus 95 Watt. It still offers all 8 cores and 16 threads and is intended for small chassis or laptops.

The performance is clearly behind the Core i9-9900K and more in the realm of the older 6-core Coffee Lake CPUs.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel Core i7-6700K

► remove from comparison Intel 6700K

The Intel Core i7-6700K is a high-end quad-core desktop processor based on the Skylake architecture, which was announced in August 2015. The CPU, which is manufactured in a 14 nm process, runs at 4.0 up to 4.2 GHz (2 cores: 4.0 GHz, 3 cores: 4.0 GHz, 4 cores: 4.0 GHz) and can execute up to 8 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyperthreading. Being a so called "K"-model, the Core i7-6700K has a free multiplier and can be easily overclocked. 

Performance

Even though the Core i7-6700K has a slightly lower clock than the old i7-4790K (4.0 GHz - 4.4 GHz), the performance is slightly better compared to the Haswell predecessor. Depending on the application, the per-MHz performance was increased by roughly 5-10 %. Even the most demanding applications and games are no problem for the high-end CPU.

Graphics

Graphics are handled by the integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 with 24 EUs (Execution Units), which is clocked at 350 - 1150 MHz. Compared to the HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell, 20 EUs), the performance is increased by around 25 percent. The overall GPU performance is still low-end, so modern games can, if at all, only be played smoothly with low settings. 

Power Consumption

The TDP was slightly raised from 88 to 91 Watts compared to the predecessor.

ModelIntel Core i9-9900TIntel Core i7-6700K
CodenameCoffee Lake-RSkylake
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Core i7 (Desktop)
Series: Core i7 (Desktop) Skylake
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T « 2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700K « 4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700 compare3.4 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700T compare2.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock2100 - 4400 MHz4000 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP35 Watt91 Watt
Technology14++ nm14 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 530 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$439 U.S.$339 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900T
29.9 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
440 Points (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2626 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1112 Points (7%)
min: 865     avg: 881     median: 880 (6%)     max: 910 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
185 Points (51%)
min: 160     avg: 174.4     median: 177.5 (49%)     max: 182 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.4 Points (16%)
min: 8.55     avg: 9.6     median: 9.7 (12%)     max: 10.2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (50%)
min: 1.72     avg: 2     median: 2 (47%)     max: 2.16 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6758 Points (41%)
min: 6434     avg: 6980     median: 6531 (39%)     max: 8845 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31357 Points (23%)
min: 19705     avg: 24305     median: 25817 (19%)     max: 26150 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 6700K +
min: 33740     avg: 34944     median: 34593 (22%)     max: 36500 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 6700K +
min: 8600     avg: 8758     median: 8624 (11%)     max: 9050 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
162.1 s (2%)
min: 178     avg: 225.4     median: 205.9 (2%)     max: 275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.9 s (1%)
min: 5.726     avg: 7.2     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 8.94 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6109 Points (10%)
5877 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
35084 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4894 MIPS (58%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
70.3 fps (24%)
min: 52.5     avg: 54.4     median: 54.6 (18%)     max: 55.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
173.4 fps (40%)
min: 194.2     avg: 204.7     median: 204.8 (47%)     max: 210.2 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
5.5 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (16%)
min: 0.203     avg: 0.4     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.507 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
min: 0.324     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.848 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.6 GB/s (12%)
min: 1.7     avg: 3.8     median: 4.4 (11%)     max: 4.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
422 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.9 sec (41%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10259 Points (22%)
min: 8973     avg: 9037     median: 9037 (19%)     max: 9101 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
min: 8.787     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 9.392 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.6 s (1%)
min: 19.7     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (1%)     max: 20.83 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
481 s (2%)
min: 463.8     avg: 479     median: 479.7 (2%)     max: 498.3 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 6700K +
min: 31997     avg: 32843     median: 32153 (25%)     max: 34379 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4080 Points (10%)
min: 10341     avg: 11161     median: 11228 (28%)     max: 11761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
12668 Points (10%)
min: 59904     avg: 61163     median: 61287.5 (50%)     max: 62149 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12727 Points (10%)
min: 59247     avg: 60685     median: 61091 (50%)     max: 62096 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13200 Points (11%)
min: 60945     avg: 61859     median: 62114 (52%)     max: 62262 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3268 Points (8%)
min: 8328     avg: 9165     median: 9272 (23%)     max: 9702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13365 Points (24%)
min: 12430     avg: 12822     median: 12870.5 (23%)     max: 13182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5870 Points (25%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1206 Points (47%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5888 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1193 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5875 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5381 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
23223 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700K +
16365 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700K +
4225 Points (83%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700K +
min: 17030     avg: 17122     median: 17122 (27%)     max: 17214 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700K +
min: 4436     avg: 4598     median: 4598 (69%)     max: 4760 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
878 ms (1%)
min: 795     avg: 800     median: 800 (1%)     max: 805 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 76.8     avg: 119.5     median: 119.5 (1%)     max: 162.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 6700K +
min: 37135     avg: 40412     median: 40411.5 (31%)     max: 43688 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
197 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.2 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
57 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
19.5 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900T → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-6700K → 153% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 10. 21:55:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12027 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6949 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752177303s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12027 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 12027 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6949 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 6949 +0.013s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.059s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)