Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900 vs Apple M3 Pro 12-Core

Intel Core i9-14900

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. The base clock is 2 GHz and can reach up to 5.8 GHz under optimal conditions. Similar to the top model (Intel Core i9-14900K), the total of 32 threads are divided into 8 p- and 16 e-cores. The 8 performance cores (p-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously. The non-K model is an economical processor. There is still the option of DDR4 or DDR5 memory.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-14900K, the Core i9-14900 offers the same number of physical computing units. However, due to the lower power consumption, the Intel Core i9-14900 delivers slightly less performance. The intended use is primarily for compact PCs with limited cooling options.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-14900K, the Intel Core i9-14900 offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900 is specified with a TDP of 65 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 219 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900, the specified power consumption has not changed.

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core

► remove from comparison Apple Apple M3 Pro 12-Core

The Apple M3 Pro (12 Core) is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was launched in late 2023. It integrates a new 12-core CPU with 6 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 6 efficiency cores with 2.8 GHz. There is also a slimmed-down 11-core variant with a 14-core GPU.

Compared to the M2 Pro the M3 Pro has been slimmed down somewhat and swaps two performance cores for efficiency cores. This is due to the changed core configuration, as 6 cores are now used per cluster (the M2 Pro and M3 still have 4 cores per cluster). Furthermore, the memory bus has been reduced from 256 bits to 192 bits (150 GB/s vs. 200 GB/s). However, thanks to the new architecture and higher clock rates, the new M3 Pro is still slightly faster.

The M3 Pro also integrates a new graphics card with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration via hardware. In the top model, all 18 cores of the chip are used and support up to 3 displays simultaneously (internal and 2 external).

GPU and CPU can jointly access the shared memory on the package (unified memory). This is available in 18 or 36 GB variants and offers 150 GB/s maximum bandwidth (192 bit bus).

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (compared to 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now also supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded.

Unfortunately, the integrated WLAN only continues to support WiFi 6E (no WiFi 7), unlike the small M3 SoC thunderbolt 4 is also supported (max 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured in the current 3nm process (N3B) at TSMC and contains 37 billion transistors (-7.5% vs. Apple M2 Pro).

ModelIntel Core i9-14900Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
CodenameRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RApple M3
Series: M3
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 « 2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Apple M3 Max 16-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M3 compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock2000 - 5800 MHz2748 - 4056 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB
L3 Cache36 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
12 / 12
6 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
6 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
TDP65 Watt27 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2219 Watt
Technology10 nm3 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
Architecturex86ARM
$549 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.dewww.apple.com
Transistors37000 Million
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900
47.2 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
129 Points (72%)
143 Points (80%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1245 Points (23%)
1059 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
31070 Points (29%)
15106 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2212 Points (93%)
1977 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
846 Points (92%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
11291 Points (28%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4793 Points (30%)
2163 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
315 Points (87%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
56.6 Points (73%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12284 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
82492 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
121768 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17590 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
85.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12359 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
101652 MIPS (58%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7276 MIPS (86%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
222 fps (74%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
358.5 fps (83%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
31.6 fps (56%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.4 GB/s (71%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.9 GB/s (84%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
18.5 GB/s (48%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
263 Seconds (3%)
314 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
131 Seconds (1%)
327 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18728 Points (40%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.8 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
303.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
93183 Points (72%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
28622 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
88787 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
90442 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
93001 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20179 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
42316 Points (75%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
19492 Points (82%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
3022 Points (75%)
3138 Points (78%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
15962 Points (62%)
15480 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2140 Points (84%)
2327 Points (91%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
17395 Points (31%)
15298 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2077 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17218 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9143 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
67178 Points (67%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
436 ms (1%)
376.2 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96501 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
315 Points (57%)
427 Points (77%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2133 Points (80%)
1977 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
145.5 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
253 Watt (46%)
47.9 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.9 Watt (20%)
5.8 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.5 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.9 Points per Watt (14%)
45.2 Points per Watt (34%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 Pro 12-Core → 89% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 05. 20:27:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18150 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15115 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751740045s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18150 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 18150 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15115 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 15115 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.054s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.056s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)