Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10400F vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a desktop processor with 8 cores and simultaneous multithreading (SMT), which means it can process 16 threads simultaneously. In April 2022, AMD presented the Ryzen 7 5700X, a new 8-core processor that is very similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. However, due to the lower TDP, there are no restrictions on the clock frequency. Nevertheless, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X reaches up to 4.6 GHz in boost, which is only 100 MHz less than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. However, the base clock drops significantly to 3.4 GHz.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is consistently excellent in all applications. The native 8-core can really show off its strengths, especially in multi-threaded applications, although the single-core performance has also been significantly improved compared to the older Zen 2 architecture.

The internal structure of the processor is similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. The CCX modules are also connected to each other via the I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. However, according to AMD, the Infinity Fabric should now achieve clock rates of up to 2 GHz, which in turn enables a RAM clock rate of 4,000 MHz without any loss of performance.

In terms of manufacturing processes, AMD also relies on TSCM for the 7nm production of the CPU cores in the Vermeer processors, although the I/O die is still supplied in 12 nm by Globalfoundries.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is impressive in gaming thanks to the significantly improved IPC compared to Zen2. In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X impresses with its low TDP of just 65 watts. This means that the processor can also be operated with a compact air cooler without any problems. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is operated with a TDP of 105 watts.

ModelIntel Core i5-10400FAMD Ryzen 7 5700X
CodenameComet LakeVermeer (Zen 3)
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)
Series: Vermeer (Ryzen 5000) Vermeer (Zen 3)
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X compare3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X compare3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X « 3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4300 MHz3400 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache12 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketLGA12001331
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
Architecturex86x86
$155 U.S.$299 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Die Size2 x 74 sq. mm; I/O = 125 sq. mm mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
30.3 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5700X
37.8 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13184 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1499 Points (63%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
438 Points (48%)
595 Points (65%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3201 Points (8%)
5405 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1332 Points (8%)
2329 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
180 Points (50%)
253 Points (70%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
26.5 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (48%)
2.9 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6719 Points (41%)
6527 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36564 Points (26%)
42876 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (31%)
74898 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (11%)
12419 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
134.7 s (2%)
89.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
3.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12478 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
36731 MIPS (21%)
65777 MIPS (38%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5064 MIPS (60%)
6522 MIPS (77%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.2 fps (27%)
134.7 fps (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
228.5 fps (53%)
305 fps (70%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.2 fps (20%)
17.1 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.4 GB/s (35%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
374 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
332.4 Seconds (2%)
221 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14862 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
20.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
470.4 s (2%)
460.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77709 Points (60%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14539 Points (36%)
20010 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62086 Points (50%)
90009 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
90305 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (50%)
92849 Points (75%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11914 Points (30%)
20598 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27800 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7548 Points (32%)
10432 Points (44%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2186 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
9331 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2100 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
9252 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (48%)     max: 1223 Points
1647 Points (64%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
9353 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
1587 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
9214 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
6928 Points (69%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (25%)
37730 Points (38%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
579 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
236 Points (65%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (39%)
310 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1423 Points (53%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
185.9 Watt (32%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (23%)
155.2 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.9 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)
15 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5700X → 143% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 19. 15:12:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15075 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755609173s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15075 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 15075 +0.006s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.071s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)