Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Processor N150

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N150

► remove from comparison Intel Processor N150

The Intel Processor N150 is the slowest mobile processor of the Twin Lake family. Twin Lake is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The N150 is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs with no fans; it offers 4 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.6 GHz, but no Performance cores. Compared to the N250, the N150 has a significantly slower iGPU and slightly lower CPU clock speeds.

Gracemont E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance should be about as good as older dual-core CPUs like the Core i3-10110U. Exact figures depend on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Either way, this is a pretty slow chip that is only just fast enough for basic tasks.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 24 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.0 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for very old games and low resolutions such as XGA 1024 x 768.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The N150 is supposed to consume 6 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. No data on PL2 has been provided but values higher than 15 W are unlikely.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

ModelIntel Core i3-N305Intel Processor N150
CodenameAlder Lake-NTwin Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Twin Lake
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N355 compare3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 compare - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 compare - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock1800 - 3800 MHz <=3600 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1264BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
26.9 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Processor N150
25 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
65 Points (37%)
min: 53     avg: 58.9     median: 60.7 (34%)     max: 61.3 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
324 Points (6%)
min: 130     avg: 162.9     median: 167.2 (3%)     max: 187 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
min: 2016     avg: 2494     median: 2590.5 (2%)     max: 2777 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
min: 828     avg: 912     median: 935 (39%)     max: 949 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (41%)     max: 380 Points
min: 313     avg: 347     median: 356.5 (39%)     max: 362 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 768     avg: 953     median: 992 (2%)     max: 1059 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
min: 313     avg: 403.3     median: 422.5 (3%)     max: 455 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (46%)     max: 167 Points
min: 134     avg: 149.2     median: 153.2 (42%)     max: 156.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
min: 4.31     avg: 5     median: 5 (6%)     max: 5.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2.05 Points
min: 1.67     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
min: 4743     avg: 5016     median: 5015.5 (30%)     max: 5288 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
min: 11375     avg: 13159     median: 13159 (10%)     max: 14943 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (26%)     max: 40726 Points
min: 17063     avg: 19392     median: 19391.5 (12%)     max: 21720 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
min: 7251     avg: 7700     median: 7699.5 (9%)     max: 8148 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
min: 527.99     avg: 775     median: 774.8 (9%)     max: 1021.52 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
min: 16.776     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 30.658 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
min: 1901     avg: 1930     median: 1929.5 (3%)     max: 1958 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 18739     avg: 20902     median: 21159.5 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
min: 9639     avg: 11373     median: 11746 (7%)     max: 12362 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (48%)     max: 4123 MIPS
min: 3590     avg: 3792     median: 3835 (45%)     max: 3906 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (19%)     max: 56.2 fps
min: 24.35     avg: 28.4     median: 28.4 (9%)     max: 32.4 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
min: 119.8     avg: 139.9     median: 139.9 (32%)     max: 159.9 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
min: 2.43     avg: 2.9     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.26 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (16%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
min: 0.217     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.256 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
min: 0.407     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (8%)     max: 0.526 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
min: 2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (6%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1152     avg: 1215     median: 1245 (16%)     max: 1246.91 Seconds
min: 2085     avg: 2337     median: 2277 (29%)     max: 2707 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
min: 1063     avg: 1191     median: 1163.5 (8%)     max: 1374 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
min: 0.846     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.957 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9081 Points (19%)
5709 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
min: 19.09     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (4%)     max: 19.293 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
36.5 s (2%)
min: 39.184     avg: 40     median: 40 (2%)     max: 40.809 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (22%)     max: 28937 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (22%)     max: 9111 Points
min: 4416     avg: 5194     median: 5274 (13%)     max: 5810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
55544 Points (45%)
min: 37351     avg: 42422     median: 42421.5 (34%)     max: 47492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
56367 Points (46%)
min: 36745     avg: 42156     median: 42156 (34%)     max: 47567 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
61854 Points (50%)
min: 43172     avg: 47134     median: 47134 (38%)     max: 51096 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
min: 3612     avg: 4035     median: 4026.5 (10%)     max: 4476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
min: 5201     avg: 5826     median: 5889.5 (11%)     max: 6324 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
min: 1704     avg: 1979     median: 1977.5 (8%)     max: 2256 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1146     avg: 1274     median: 1311 (33%)     max: 1326 Points
min: 1129     avg: 1218     median: 1243 (31%)     max: 1255 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 4329     avg: 4681     median: 4679.5 (18%)     max: 5034 Points
min: 2369     avg: 2849     median: 2967.5 (12%)     max: 3093 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1261 Points (40%)
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
4584 Points (19%)
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 997     avg: 1050     median: 1060.5 (41%)     max: 1083 Points
min: 924     avg: 977     median: 981.5 (38%)     max: 1020 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4492     avg: 4651     median: 4603 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
min: 2072     avg: 2463     median: 2556.5 (5%)     max: 2667 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
min: 907     avg: 941     median: 940.5 (4%)     max: 974 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
min: 2079     avg: 2309     median: 2308.5 (7%)     max: 2538 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
min: 4336     avg: 4432     median: 4431.5 (44%)     max: 4527 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (17%)     max: 17690 Points
min: 8942     avg: 9608     median: 9608 (10%)     max: 10274 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 708.5     avg: 917     median: 982.5 (1%)     max: 993 ms
min: 1044     avg: 1098     median: 1080.5 (1%)     max: 1186 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 140.3     avg: 167.2     median: 167.2 (46%)     max: 194 Points
min: 118.3     avg: 126.6     median: 126.3 (35%)     max: 135.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (33%)     max: 190.4 Points
min: 145.3     avg: 164.6     median: 169.3 (30%)     max: 174.3 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
1.6 MB/s (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
292.4 MB/s (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
43 MB/s (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 i3-N305 +
374.6 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 i3-N305 +
11631 Points (42%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 881     avg: 937     median: 919.5 (34%)     max: 1027 Points
min: 683     avg: 716     median: 712.5 (27%)     max: 756 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 22.9     avg: 26.5     median: 24.3 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
min: 21.6     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 25.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
36.9 Watt (7%)
min: 20.1     avg: 22.5     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 24.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.4     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 7.2 Watt
min: 7.51     avg: 10.2     median: 8.9 (6%)     max: 14.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 6.5     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 8.45 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)
min: 13     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 20 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N150 → 83% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 12. 15:52:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18713 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755006764s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.009s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18713 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 18713 +0.006s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.065s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)