Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-N300 vs Intel Core i3-N305

Intel Core i3-N300

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N300

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz (single core, 3 GHz all core Turbo). The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance depends on the cooling and TDP settings and should be somewhere similar to the old  Alder Lake Pentium 8500 (1 performance core, 4 efficiency cores, max. 4.4 GHz and 8 MB L3-cache). The multi-threaded performance should be quite good with the 8 cores but will suffer due to the low TDP. Single thread performance will suffer due to the missing P-cores and relatively low boost clock speeds.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 7 W and is therefore even suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i3-N300Intel Core i3-N305
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 « - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock <=3800 MHz1800 - 3800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP7 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
SocketBGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N300
20 pt (28%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
28.8 pt (40%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
34 Points (24%)
65 Points (45%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
165 Points (3%)
324 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2546 Points (2%)
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
513 Points (22%)
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
195 Points (22%)
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (42%)     max: 380 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
968 Points (2%)
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
416 Points (3%)
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
85 Points (26%)
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (50%)     max: 167 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.3 Points (7%)
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (25%)
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (51%)     max: 2.05 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2884 Points (17%)
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
12014 Points (9%)
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
18450 Points (13%)
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (28%)     max: 40726 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
4497 Points (5%)
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
531 s (6%)
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
17.5 s (4%)
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1915 Points (3%)
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
11976 MIPS (7%)
min: 21080     avg: 21623     median: 21239 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2403 MIPS (29%)
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (49%)     max: 4123 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
28.9 fps (10%)
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (20%)     max: 56.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
106.6 fps (25%)
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
3.2 fps (6%)
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.6 GB/s (7%)
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2147 Seconds (27%)
min: 1152     avg: 1199     median: 1198.5 (15%)     max: 1245 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1095 Seconds (8%)
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.3 sec (29%)
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4261 Points (9%)
9081 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
33.2 s (7%)
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
69.1 s (3%)
36.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1381 s (6%)
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
15263 Points (13%)
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (25%)     max: 28937 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4983 Points (13%)
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (24%)     max: 9111 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
28114 Points (23%)
55544 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
28073 Points (23%)
56367 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
28903 Points (24%)
61854 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4049 Points (10%)
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5528 Points (10%)
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
762 Points (23%)
min: 1304     avg: 1316     median: 1318 (40%)     max: 1326 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
2803 Points (11%)
min: 4632     avg: 4798     median: 4727 (19%)     max: 5034 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
626 Points (26%)
min: 1050     avg: 1068     median: 1071 (45%)     max: 1083 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2674 Points (5%)
min: 4492     avg: 4680     median: 4644 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
616 Points (3%)
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2642 Points (8%)
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2913 Points (29%)
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9894 Points (11%)
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (19%)     max: 17690 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1638 ms (2%)
min: 981     avg: 986     median: 984 (1%)     max: 993 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 140.3     avg: 158.2     median: 145.3 (42%)     max: 189 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
104.3 Points (22%)
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (39%)     max: 190.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
529 Points (20%)
min: 881     avg: 907     median: 881 (34%)     max: 958 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
24.4 Watt (4%)
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 22.9     avg: 27.6     median: 25.5 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
22.2 Watt (4%)
36.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
14.7 Watt (10%)
108%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.6     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 7.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 5.76 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N300 → 100% n=50

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 176% n=50

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 07:23:13

#0 checking url part for id 14928 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14928 +0.023s ... 0.051s

#7 got single benchmarks 14928 +0.015s ... 0.067s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.023s ... 0.089s

#9 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.036s ... 0.126s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.468s ... 0.594s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.619s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)