Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10100F vs Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i3-10100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10100F

The Intel Core i3-10100F is an entry level quad-core processor for desktop PCs based on the Comet Lake-S architecture. It offers four cores clocked at 3.6 - 4.3 GHz with HyperThreading / SMT support (8 threads). The CPU is still manufactured on 14nm++ and does not feature an integrated graphics card. Compared to the older Coffee Lake Core i3-9100F, the i3-10100F offers a 100 MHz higher Boost speed, HyperThreading and support for faster DDR4 memory (2666 MHz).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the 10100F as of August 2023, it's reasonable to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i5-10200H.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor won't need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases.

Intel Core i9-10850K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10850K

The Intel Core i9-10850K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.2 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.2 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz). Compared to the fastest CML-S CPU, the Core i9-10900K, the 10850K clocks 100 MHz lower (base and Turbo clocks).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is a very fast gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i3-10100FIntel Core i9-10850K
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet LakeComet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K « 3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4300 MHz3600 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 810 / 20
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
Die Size126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA12001200
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3TVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
$122 U.S.$453 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10850K
40.2 pt (56%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15538 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1314 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
511 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5961 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2457 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (65%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.1 Points (37%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.5 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6829 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58453 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
76123 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6828 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
68.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9424 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
70932 MIPS (41%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5914 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
146.5 fps (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
285.5 fps (66%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
20.3 fps (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
181.2 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
419.8 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
22639 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72388 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72353 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
73572 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19764 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28058 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14278 Points (60%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1072 Points (45%)
1401 Points (59%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3650 Points (7%)
11436 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1412 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11426 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6425 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
44146 Points (49%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
717 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
253 Points (53%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
302.2 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
259.3 Watt (47%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.5 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100F → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10850K → 222% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 12:01:57

#0 checking url part for id 12774 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13162 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12774 +0.002s ... 0.028s

#7 got single benchmarks 12774 +0.006s ... 0.034s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13162 +0.017s ... 0.051s

#9 got single benchmarks 13162 +0.008s ... 0.059s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.163s ... 0.221s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.245s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)