Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i3-10100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-10100 is a four-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake S architecture. The processor clocks at 3.6 - 4.3 GHz and can process up to 8 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i3-10100 is manufactured in the improved 14nm process (14nm++). Compared to the older i3-9100 (Comet Lake-S), the 10100 offers a 100 MHz higher turbo clock, multithreading and support for faster DDR4-2666 memory.

Performance

The performance should be only slightly above the Core i3-9100 in the entry level for desktop CPUs. Thus the performance is sufficient for office and undemanding gaming.

Graphics Card

The Intel Core i3-10100 is a processor with a rather slow entry level integrated graphics unit (Intel UHD Graphics 630). 

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Core i5-11400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400F

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a fast six-core desktop processor based on the new Rocket Lake architecture, which was introduced in March 2021. The processor clocks with a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches an all-core boost of 4.2 GHz under load. In single-thread applications, the Intel Core i5-11400F even reaches up to 4.4 GHz. Intel also gives the Rocket Lake processors the Hyperthreading feature, which allows the i5-11400F to process up to 12 threads simultaneously. As known, the Intel Core i5-11400F is manufactured in the 14 nm process. Nevertheless, many changes have been made with the Rocket Lake architecture, which is also reflected in the performance compared to the Comet Lake. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a non-K CPU, which means that there is no freely selectable multiplier. Thus, the scope for overclocking is relatively small.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-10400F, the Core i5-11400F offers a significantly better IPC. This can be seen clearly in the single-core benchmarks. But the multi-core performance also benefits from the better IPC compared to Comet-Lake. A performance increase of up to 20 percent can be expected. The Core i5 has to do without the TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost). However, 4.2 GHz is still possible when all cores are loaded. Due to the very high single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-11400F is best suited for video games.

Graphics

The processors marked with "F" in the nomenclature don't offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can fall back on the Intel UHD Graphics 750 and also allow operation without a dedicated graphics card.

Power consumption

The TDP turns out relatively low with 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-11400F offers a higher TDP of up to 154 watts with PL2. However, this may only be applied for a maximum of 28 seconds (dew). A good air cooler should be able to handle the resulting waste heat, so no AiO is necessary for this processor.

ModelIntel Core i3-10100Intel Core i5-11400F
CodenameComet Lake-SRocket Lake
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Rocket Lake
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T compare1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4300 MHz2600 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB480 KB
L2 Cache1 MB3 MB
L3 Cache6 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
Die Size126 mm2276 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1200LGA1200
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$130 U.S.$157 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400F
33 pt (55%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10235 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1339 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
436 Points (47%)
502 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2181 Points (5%)
3945 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
895 Points (6%)
1574 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
181 Points (50%)
210 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.9 Points (13%)
17.7 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (49%)
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6863 Points (41%)
6210 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
26903 Points (19%)
44220 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
34987 Points (22%)
57417 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8914 Points (11%)
8876 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
194.1 s (2%)
117.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
4.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6124 Points (10%)
7147 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 24319     avg: 24356     median: 24355.5 (14%)     max: 24392 MIPS
41522 MIPS (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4797     avg: 4853     median: 4853 (57%)     max: 4909 MIPS
5466 MIPS (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
55.8 fps (1%)
91.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
212.5 fps (5%)
258 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.7     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (14%)     max: 7.78 fps
13.5 fps (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
0.8 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
8.7 GB/s (23%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 492.2     avg: 493.7     median: 493.7 (3%)     max: 495.1 Seconds
290.2 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.634     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.652 sec
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13359 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.9 s (2%)
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20 s (1%)
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
481.8 s (2%)
703 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57236 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15367 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 61562     avg: 74373     median: 74373 (60%)     max: 87184 Points
71688 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 61702     avg: 74370     median: 74369.5 (60%)     max: 87037 Points
71496 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 62930     avg: 74011     median: 74011 (59%)     max: 85092 Points
74053 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9394     avg: 16477     median: 16477 (42%)     max: 23560 Points
13346 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13268     avg: 24581     median: 24581 (44%)     max: 35894 Points
21144 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5274     avg: 5304     median: 5303.5 (22%)     max: 5333 Points
8468 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1396 Points (34%)
1956 Points (47%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
3844 Points (15%)
8816 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1171     avg: 1188     median: 1187.5 (45%)     max: 1204 Points
1575 Points (60%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4740     avg: 4758     median: 4758 (9%)     max: 4776 Points
7681 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1167     avg: 1184     median: 1183.5 (5%)     max: 1200 Points
1543 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4724     avg: 4748     median: 4748 (15%)     max: 4772 Points
7679 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5494     avg: 5563     median: 5563 (56%)     max: 5632 Points
6836 Points (68%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18622     avg: 18692     median: 18692 (18%)     max: 18762 Points
30191 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 833     avg: 836     median: 835.5 (1%)     max: 838 ms
654 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 202     avg: 207.5     median: 207.5 (37%)     max: 213 Points
255 Points (46%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.5     avg: 115.2     median: 115.2 (20%)     max: 121.9 Watt
236 Watt (41%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 96.7     avg: 101.9     median: 101.9 (19%)     max: 107.1 Watt
204 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
9.3 Points per Watt (7%)
7.7 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100 → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400F → 137% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 03. 20:13:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12793 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13219 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759515225s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 02 Oct 2025 12:30:24 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12793 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 12793 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13219 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 13219 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.059s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)