Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H vs Intel Core i5-14600K

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 135H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 +2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.6 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 135H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. Naturally, the 135H also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 135H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 135H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be at least as fast as the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to give the Radeon 780M something to think about. The Arc is set to be miles ahead of aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 5 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus higher performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 135H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core i5-14600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-14600K

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a modern desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which inherits the 13th generation of Intel Core processors with minor improvements. The processor offers a base clock of 3.5 GHz and reaches up to 5.3 GHz in Turbo. The basic CPU structure remains unchanged. This means that the Intel Core i5-14600K also has 6 P-cores and 8 E-cores, which means that up to 20 threads can be processed in parallel. The Intel Core i5-14600K still offers a freely selectable multiplier, which makes overclocking much easier. The LGA 1700 socket, which was already introduced with Alder-Lake, is also used as the basis.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-13600K , the IPC of the new Core i5-14600K has only been increased slightly. This means that the difference in performance is also only slight. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. As a further innovation, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-13600K, the Intel Core i5-14600K also has an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-14600K is 125 watts, with the option of consuming up to 181 watts in Turbo mode. If all limits are removed, the energy requirement rises to up to 240 watts. For cooling, we recommend a powerful air cooler or a 240 AiO.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 135HIntel Core i5-14600K
CodenameMeteor Lake-HRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Raptor Lake-R
Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H « 3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 compare2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K « 3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4600 MHz3500 - 5300 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 18 4.6 GHz
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x Intel Crestmont E-Core
14 / 20
6 x 5.3 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.5 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP28 Watt125 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enerp., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHAIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
NPU / AI11 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com
L2 Cache20 MB
$319 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-14600K
44.1 pt (73%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99.2 Points (56%)
122 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
575 Points (11%)
1392 Points (26%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10951     avg: 11876     median: 11875.5 (11%)     max: 12800 Points
24491 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1672     avg: 1700     median: 1700 (72%)     max: 1728 Points
2064 Points (87%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
652 Points (71%)
790 Points (86%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4228 Points (10%)
9371 Points (23%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1718 Points (11%)
3640 Points (23%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
244 Points (68%)
297 Points (82%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
41 Points (53%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (85%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9317 Points (56%)
11396 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42283 Points (31%)
75358 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
115171 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16643 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
506 s (6%)
158.8 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
11491 Points (18%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4839 MIPS (57%)
6910 MIPS (81%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
93235 MIPS (54%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
98 fps (2%)
209 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
271.5 fps (7%)
411 fps (11%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.5 fps (22%)
28.6 fps (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
1.8 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
3.4 GB/s (59%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.3 GB/s (19%)
19.5 GB/s (51%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
542 Seconds (7%)
223 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
338 Seconds (2%)
134 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12383 Points (26%)
18096 Points (39%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.4 s (2%)
6.2 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
457.8 s (2%)
316.7 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
96263 Points (74%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14970 Points (37%)
31641 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76741 Points (62%)
123069 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
123244 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
109954 Points (88%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13970 Points (35%)
27407 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
19468 Points (35%)
40164 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7281 Points (31%)
18768 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2257     avg: 2278     median: 2278 (55%)     max: 2299 Points
2879 Points (70%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 10077     avg: 10368     median: 10368 (40%)     max: 10659 Points
17409 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2764 Points (88%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
16875 Points (69%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1640     avg: 1652     median: 1651.5 (63%)     max: 1663 Points
2017 Points (77%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8637     avg: 9226     median: 9225.5 (17%)     max: 9814 Points
17516 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2004 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17374 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6693 Points (67%)
8904 Points (89%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
32577 Points (32%)
64035 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
571 ms (1%)
450 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
57.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
92150 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
234 Points (64%)
301 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
264 Points (47%)
354 Points (64%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1465 Points (55%)
2310 Points (86%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
52.9 Watt (9%)
370 Watt (64%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
53.4 Watt (10%)
329 Watt (60%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.5 Watt (10%)
110.4 Watt (73%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
32.2 Points per Watt (24%)
11.1 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 135H → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-14600K → 180% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 16. 02:46:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16909 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15093 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760575595s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:49:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16909 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 16909 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15093 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 15093 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.062s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)