Notebookcheck Logo

The Best Smartphones

December 2022 Update. Smartphones have become an indispensable and universal tool of modern life. Be it keeping in touch with friends, preserving memories, providing entertainment, reading the latest news or shopping online: the list is endless. Finding the right smartphone is thus no easy affair. Listed below are the best smartphones as determined by our extensive review process.

Smartphones are destroying everything else in terms of sales in the mobile market. These incredibly versatile devices outstripped normal cell phones ages ago. With even stronger processors and growing display sizes, the so-called "phablets" are now encroaching on tablet territory. The line between these devices is growing increasingly blurry - at least at the upper end of the market. These smartphone-tablet crossbreeds have taken many of the top spots in our smartphone Top 10 list. As a result, most of the top models in our list are occupied by very recently released devices. Still, here and there a brave old soldier has clung on to the top of the ladder.

The Best Smartphones

Position
Total Rating
Date
Image
Model
Height
Weight
Size
Refresh-Rate
Resolution
Screen-to-Body
OS
190.3 %
01/2023
Apple iPhone 14 ProApple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic
Apple A16 GPU 5-Core
6 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
7.85 mm206 g6.10"120 Hz2556x117987 %Apple iOS 16
289.8 %
10/2022
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Qualcomm Adreno 730
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
6.3 mm263 g7.60"120 Hz2176x181291 %Android 12
389.8 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13 miniApple iPhone 13 mini
Apple A15 Bionic
Apple A15 GPU 4-Core
4 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
7.65 mm140 g5.40"060 Hz2340x108085 %Apple iOS 15
489.5 %
01/2023
Asus ROG Phone 6 ProAsus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Qualcomm Adreno 730
18 GB Memory, 512 GB 
10.3 mm239 g6.78"165 Hz2448x108082 %Android 12
589.4 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
8.9 mm228 g6.80"120 Hz3088x144090 %Android 12
689.3 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 UltraMotorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Qualcomm Adreno 730
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
8.39 mm198.5 g6.67"144 Hz2400x108090 %Android 12
789.3 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
7.6 mm167 g6.10"120 Hz2340x108089 %Android 12
889.2 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 ProOppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Qualcomm Adreno 730
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
8.5 mm221 g6.70"120 Hz3216x144089 %Android 12
989.1 %
11/2022
New
Google Pixel 7 ProGoogle Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 
8.9 mm212 g6.70"120 Hz3120x144088 %Android 13
1088.9 %
11/2022
New
Huawei Mate 50 ProHuawei Mate 50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Qualcomm Adreno 730
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
8.5 mm209 g6.70"120 Hz2616x121292 %Android 12

The table above contains an overview over the best smartphones reviewed by Notebookcheck over the course of the past 12 months as well as still relevant and available older products. In cases of identical score the more recent device is listed first. All prices in above table and price comparisons are updated daily and can thus differ.
Link: all devices in this class reviewed

Editors' Comments

There are two newcomers this month. However, the Google Pixel 7 and the Xiaomi 12T Pro did not quite make it into the top 10.

1st – Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Max)

Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The Apple iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max are similar in many areas. Both rely on an identical triple camera, whose core is the new 48 MPix sensor. They are also available with at least 128 storage and can fall back on model variants with up to 1,024 GB. Furthermore, UWB, wireless charging, MagSafe, and IP68 certification are on board.

Apple's iPhone 14 Pro models no longer have a notch, but rely on the Dynamic Island instead.

The 14 Pro has a 6.1-inch OLED display with up to 120 Hz, that of the Max smartphone is 6.7 inches. The larger model is correspondingly heavier, and it also has a disproportionately stronger battery that ensures noticeably longer runtimes.

Both iPhones can be purchased directly from Apple in all color and storage variants.

2nd – Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a foldable smartphone that has a 6.2-inch AMOLED display on the outside. When it is unfolded, there is a 7.6-inch panel inside. Both work with a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. The triple camera is composed of a 50 MPix sensor and is supplemented by a triple optical zoom as well as an ultra-wide angle. 

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is the technically strongest foldable smartphone. 

In the review, the Fold4 can convince with its bright OLEDs, IPX8 certification, a fast Qualcomm SoC and long software support. However, it is quite thick when folded and the UD camera in the large panel is rather weak in terms of quality. 
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is available directly from Samsung, but can also be purchased from Amazon for $1,519.99.

Pricecompare

3rd – Apple iPhone 13 mini

Apple iPhone 13 mini
Apple iPhone 13 mini

If you are looking for a compact high-end smartphone the Apple iPhone 13 mini is your best bet. System performance, camera quality, and battery life are second to none other in its class. Of all the phones reviewed in the most recent past only the Asus Zenfone 8 gets even close in terms of size. It is very fast yet not as fast as the iPhone 13 mini, and its 5.9-inch display is quite a bit bigger than the iPhone 13 mini’s 5.4-inch display.

The iPhone 13 mini’s Performance and connectivity are second to none.

Apps are running smoothly and without any problems. The system is very snappy and fast, which is at least partly courtesy of the iPhone 13 mini’s great touchscreen. It gets very bright and is thus well usable outdoors. Given that the entry-level models have now been bumped to 128 GB of storage the woes of the past should be just that: of the past.

The Apple iPhone 13 mini is available through Apple as well as the usual retail channels, such as Amazon.

Pricecompare

4th – Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro

The Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro, as well as the non-Pro model, are currently the best gaming smartphones and packed with strong technology. The ROG Phone convinces with a bright and accurate 165 Hz AMOLED display that is protected by the latest Gorilla Glass Victus and has a high touch sampling rate of 720 Hz. The fast Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 ensures an appealing performance and is cooled so well that the performance is only slightly affected even during long use. Furthermore, the ROG Phone offers numerous interfaces, dedicated ultrasonic sensors as an additional control option, a quad DAC, and powerful speakers.

The smartphones are equipped with ample storage and the 6,000 mAh battery helps them achieve long runtimes. The camera setup has been upgraded and now relies on Sony's IMX766 image sensor as its core. The rather short update period and the comparatively high weight can be criticized.

The ROG Phone 6 starts at $999.99 for the lowest variant with 12/256 GB, the Pro model offers 18 GB RAM as well as 512 GB internal storage and costs $1,299.99, directly from the Asus store. The phone is also available on Amazon US for $1,029.98 with 16 / 512 GB.

Pricecompare

5th - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Visually, the S21+ is identical to the S21 save for its slightly bigger size.
Visually, the S21+ is identical to the S21 save for its slightly bigger size.

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a well-made blend of Samsung’s traditional Ultra-series intertwined with their Note-series. It features a high-resolution 6.8-inch LTPO AMOLED display with support for the integrated S-Pen. It comes with up to 12 GB of RAM and 1,024 GB of internal storage. However, we find the entry level SKU’s 8 GB of RAM to be somewhat meager.

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a powerful piece of technology. However, at the time of writing we found it to be in need of fine-tuning on various fronts.

Its color-accurate display can get extremely bright, and its connectivity includes everything your heart might desire except for 5G mmWave that is not available in Europe. Like its predecessors, the S22 Ultra is IP68-certified against ingress of dust and water and will receive updates from Samsung for a very long time.

Unfortunately, it’s brand-new AMD GPU is not perfect (yet), and its gaming performance is thus somewhat limited at the moment. In this price range, we also would not have expected the occasional frame drops we noticed.

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is available among others on Amazon, with prices starting just North of $1,000 for the 8 GB / 128 GB entry-level SKU.

Pricecompare

6th – Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a 6.67-inch pOLED display that offers a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz and Full HD+ resolution. It is powered by a fast Qualcomm processor with 12 GB of RAM. The internal storage is 256 GB and cannot be expanded. One highlight of the smartphone is the camera setup, as the Edge 30 Ultra is the first smartphone with a 200 MPix camera. 

Motorola succeeds in creating an attractive smartphone with the Edge 30 Ultra that hardly leaves anything to be desired. 

Among other things, the bright display is convincing in the review. Furthermore, the Moto phone can be charged very quickly both wired and wirelessly and also offers very good battery runtimes. Only a higher IP certification and eSIM support would have been desirable. 

Currently, the Edge 30 Ultra is not available in the US.

Pricecompare

7th – Samsung Galaxy S22 and S22+

Samsung Galaxy S22 / S22+
Samsung Galaxy S22 / S22+

Samsung's Galaxy S22 is the most affordable entry into the Korean manufacturer's premium model lineup. It has a 6.1-inch OLED screen, 8 GB of RAM, and either 128 or 256 GB of internal storage. The heart of the powerful triple camera is a 50 MP sensor, which is supplemented by ultra-wide-angle and triple optical zoom features. A 3,700 mAh battery provides appealing runtimes. There are no major compromises compared with its larger sister models; only a lower maximum charging performance, a missing UWB chip and the lack of Wi-Fi 6E are points of criticism here.

The Samsung Galaxy S22 and S22+ score well with high value, a long-term supply of updates and strong specs.

The Samsung Galaxy S22+ is a bit bigger and, besides the larger display and a stronger battery, also has the aforementioned missing features of the S22 and can make use of 45-watt charging. Both models will be supplied with updates for a long time to come and are also protected against dust and water (IP 68).

The Galaxy smartphones can be ordered directly from Samsung, but are also available from all common online retailers like Amazon.

Pricecompare

8th – Oppo Find X5 Pro

Oppo Find X5 Pro
Oppo Find X5 Pro

The Oppo Find X5 Pro is a well-made evolution of its predecessor. It features a 1440p AMOLED display, a fast Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 with 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage, an IP68 certification, fast wired, and wireless charging. Its main focus is the powerful triple-camera array developed jointly with Hasselblad.

The Oppo Find X5 Pro is a well-made smartphone with only minor flaws.

In our review, we found the color tuning by Hasselblad to result in photos that were slightly to cool. Overall, the Oppo Find X5 Pro lacked major flaws but could have benefited from a more accurate GPS modem. We would have also expected support for 6 GHz Wi-Fi 6 in this price range. Instead, the device is limited to just VHT80 Wi-Fi 6.

Oppo smartphones are not officially sold in North America. International unlocked GSM-only versions can be purchased on Amazon with prices starting at $1,700. 

Pricecompare

9th – Google Pixel 7 Pro

Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro

The Google Pixel 7 Pro has a 6.7-inch LTPO OLED display that works at up to 120 Hz and has a very high resolution. The smartphone is powered by the second-generation Tensor SoC, which is supported by 12 GB of working memory. There is a choice of 128 or 256 GB for the internal storage; microSD cards are not supported.

The Google Pixel 7 Pro is an excellently equipped high-end smartphone at a fair price-performance ratio. 

The panel convinces with high brightness and accurate color reproduction in the test. The triple camera delivers good results and offers a very wide range of uses from macro shots, an ultra-wide-angle and a 5x optical zoom, to a 30x digital magnification. Fast USB 3.2, UWB, an IP68 certification and a long update supply round off the equipment list. 

The Pixel 7 Pro can be purchased directly from the Google Store, but is also available from other retailers like Amazon.

Pricecompare

10th - Huawei Mate 50 Pro

Huawei Mate 50 Pro
Huawei Mate 50 Pro

The Huawei Mate 50 Pro offers a 6.7-inch OLED display with a high pixel density as well as a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 with 8 GB of RAM is fast, but it has to do without 5G. The internal storage is 256 GB, which can be expanded via a nano memory card. In addition, Huawei provides USB 3.2, IP68 certification, fast charging with or without cables, an IR blaster, and 3D face recognition.

The Huawei Mate 50 Pro is a strong high-end smartphone, but it still has to do without Google services and has to submit to further trade restrictions.

The triple camera of the Huawei smartphone convinces in the test and offers an ultra-wide-angle and a powerful zoom in addition to the appealing main lens. However, the Mate 50 Pro still has to do without Google services due to the ongoing trade war. This also applies to Wi-Fi 6E, 5G as well as the aptX Bluetooth codecs. 

Interested buyers can check directly via the manufacturer here. Select your location, then type HUAWEI Mate 50 Pro in the search bar. Other suppliers, such as Amazon, may also list the smartphone. Amazon India, for example, offers the 256GB variant for ₹1,54,990.

Pricecompare

Best Smartphones in Comparison

Size Comparison

163.9 mm / 6.45 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 210 g0.463 lbs164.3 mm / 6.47 inch 74.6 mm / 2.94 inch 8.38 mm / 0.3299 inch 234 g0.516 lbs163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 77.9 mm / 3.07 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 228 g0.503 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 73.9 mm / 2.91 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 221 g0.4872 lbs158.8 mm / 6.25 inch 72.8 mm / 2.87 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs158.2 mm / 6.23 inch 128.1 mm / 5.04 inch 6.4 mm / 0.252 inch 271 g0.597 lbs155.7 mm / 6.13 inch 74.5 mm / 2.93 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs146.7 mm / 5.78 inch 71.5 mm / 2.81 inch 7.65 mm / 0.3012 inch 203 g0.4475 lbs146 mm / 5.75 inch 70.6 mm / 2.78 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 167 g0.3682 lbs131.5 mm / 5.18 inch 64.2 mm / 2.53 inch 7.65 mm / 0.3012 inch 140 g0.3086 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Test Results

Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8)
0.872 ?(0.448, 0.424)
8.486 ?(4.243, 4.243)
3.2 ?(1.2, 2)
0.711 ?(0.364, 0.348)
0.692 ?(0.346, 0.346)
1.058 ?(0.448, 0.611)
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
Response Time Black / White *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
4 ?(2, 2)
1.501 ?(0.7, 0.801)
1.275 ?(0.644, 0.631)
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
1.389 ?(0.793, 0.597)
1.354 ?(0.73, 0.624)
0.933 ?(0.438, 0.495)
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
PWM Frequency
510 ?(100)
510 ?(100)
120
239.8
510 ?(68)
361
360.5
60
245.1 ?(100)
247.5
Screen
Brightness middle
1050
851
1077
853
891
746
794
765
808
758
Brightness
1058
847
1093
858
888
744
801
771
820
758
Brightness Distribution
98
98
97
96
99
97
97
95
97
99
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1
1.2
1.9
1.9
0.9
0.9
1.2
2.9
1.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
2
2
3.2
3.7
1.6
2.2
2.6
4.2
3.1
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.9
1.3
1.6
1.5
1.5
2.5
2.3
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.21 100%
2.37 93%
2.07 106%
2.3 96%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.01 109%
2.06 107%
CCT
6504 100%
6423 101%
6526 100%
6460 101%
6527 100%
6499 100%
6654 98%
6446 101%
6359 102%
6378 102%
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
35.1
34.6
36.1
33.7
39.7
36.1
37.3
35.1
36.3
35.4
Maximum Bottom *
35.8
34.9
34.8
35
36
34.1
36
34
37.2
35.3
Idle Upper Side *
33.6
33.3
28.1
28.6
32.5
28.6
27.6
30
30.8
31.8
Idle Bottom *
33.6
31.6
27
27.2
28.2
27.8
24.8
27.3
29.8
28.7
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
2614
3107
1973
2182
1108
1269
1257
1430
H.264
1493
1043
1078
887
1006
1142
1004
934
WiFi v1.3
993
849
844
675
650
788
667
590
610
594
Load
333
302
410
324
276
367
330
388
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.57
0.58
0.69
1.13
1.24
0.7
1.24
1.02
1.01
Idle Average *
1.54
1.38
0.71
1.19
1.67
1.39
1
2.14
1.18
1.5
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.41
1.16
1.26
1.69
1.42
1.04
2.2
1.27
1.6
Load Average *
3.06
2.65
7.07
6.97
5.17
3.58
6.87
3.95
5.25
5.54
Load Maximum *
4.59
3.56
11.32
8.85
9.9
6.99
9.87
10.45
7.74
9.16

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
1749 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
1729 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1154 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1145 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points ∼43%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1257 Points ∼54%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1057 Points ∼46%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1109 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1135 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1092 Points ∼47%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
4829 Points ∼17%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
4559 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3560 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3474 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3462 Points ∼12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3488 Points ∼12%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2941 Points ∼10%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3342 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3485 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3204 Points ∼11%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
7773 Points ∼41%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10415 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10206 Points ∼54%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12123 Points ∼64%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9654 Points ∼51%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10539 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8257 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9787 Points ∼52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
31940 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18689 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17842 Points ∼42%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25285 Points ∼59%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15556 Points ∼36%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15799 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10491 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15358 Points ∼36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
2130 Points ∼30%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4085 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points ∼58%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4296 Points ∼61%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4147 Points ∼59%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4867 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4731 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4312 Points ∼61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
5956 Points ∼37%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
5724 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8612 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8268 Points ∼51%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points ∼62%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7742 Points ∼48%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9322 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8804 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8366 Points ∼52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
16221 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
13283 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12972 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11893 Points ∼46%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10733 Points ∼42%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12120 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11775 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11309 Points ∼44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
1852 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
1913 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3957 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4000 Points ∼50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points ∼49%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3919 Points ∼49%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5156 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4675 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4378 Points ∼55%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
9386 Points ∼5%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
9125 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7236 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7064 Points ∼4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5689 Points ∼3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9826 Points ∼5%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6516 Points ∼3%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5758 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5381 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5683 Points ∼3%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
11700 Points ∼6%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
9881 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7458 Points ∼4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5734 Points ∼3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points ∼5%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7057 Points ∼4%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5915 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4418 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5872 Points ∼3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60.1 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps ∼4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps ∼3%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼4%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
417 fps ∼3%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
375.2 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
281 fps ∼2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps ∼3%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
125 fps ∼1%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
281 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
173 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
178 fps ∼1%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60.1 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps ∼27%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼16%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼18%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps ∼28%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
229 fps ∼18%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
165.9 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
177 fps ∼14%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps ∼14%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼7%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps ∼8%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60.1 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps ∼3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼1%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps ∼2%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
151 fps ∼3%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
125.1 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps ∼3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps ∼3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼1%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps ∼2%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps ∼1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼1%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼1%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
95 fps ∼0%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
68.8 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps ∼0%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps ∼0%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps ∼0%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
119 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
95.9 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps ∼11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps ∼13%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps ∼9%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼7%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼25%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60.1 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼22%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps ∼18%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps ∼22%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
39 fps ∼13%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
34.56 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps ∼9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼13%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼10%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps ∼8%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼37%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
56.6 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps ∼16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps ∼22%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps ∼20%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼26%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
800608 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
722973 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
704479 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
813746 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
801983 Points ∼57%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
856953 Points ∼60%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
720905 Points ∼51%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
793997 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
714178 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
743221 Points ∼52%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
4435 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
4082 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2927 Points ∼30%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
105536 Points ∼37%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
105831 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6217 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6487 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
262983 Points ∼92%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5982 Points ∼2%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5782 Points ∼2%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6762 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
254430 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10841 Points ∼13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68880 Points ∼81%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27946 Points ∼33%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
248 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
252 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
124 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
149 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 Points ∼36%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
133 Points ∼34%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 Points ∼27%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
156 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
136 Points ∼34%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1653 MB/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1486 MB/s ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1928 MB/s ∼54%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1410 MB/s ∼40%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1560 MB/s ∼44%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1836 MB/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1934 MB/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 MB/s ∼46%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1074 MB/s ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
993 MB/s ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
756 MB/s ∼28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
894 MB/s ∼33%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
242.5 MB/s ∼9%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
755 MB/s ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
790 MB/s ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
760 MB/s ∼28%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
322.3 MB/s ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
273 MB/s ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
259.3 MB/s ∼48%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
183.7 MB/s ∼34%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
129.4 MB/s ∼24%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
269.3 MB/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
215.5 MB/s ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245.1 MB/s ∼45%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
273.1 MB/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257.6 MB/s ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
329.7 MB/s ∼60%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
210.4 MB/s ∼38%
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
178.5 MB/s ∼32%
Huawei P50 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
329.6 MB/s ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
195.7 MB/s ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211.2 MB/s ∼38%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
698 (632min - 775max) MBit/s ∼29%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
405 (198min - 498max) MBit/s ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1190 (1121min - 1230max) MBit/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1368 (671min - 1409max) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AX12 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
660 (599min - 698max) MBit/s ∼28%
Apple iPhone 13 mini
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
620 (297min - 709max) MBit/s ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
779 (363min - 824max) MBit/s ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
893 (428min - 917max) MBit/s ∼38%
Read all 25 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > The Best Smartphones
Mike Wobker (Update: 2022-12-12)