Notebookcheck

The Best Compact Smartphones

January 2021 update. Smartphones with large display are a dime a dozen. However, things are rather bleak if you’re looking for a compact smartphone. Below, you will find the best compact smartphones reviewed by us.
Daniel Schmidt (translated by Finn D. Boerne), 🇩🇪 🇹🇷 ...

Smartphone with screens smaller than 5.5 inches were standard a short while ago, but devices with 6.3 inches or more are dominating the market right now. This is a a result of the popular aspect ratios 2:1, 19:9 or even 21:9. Then we have a new category of foldable smartphones, so devices with screens bigger than 7 inches will not be unusual in the near future. 

Compact devices are still popular, so we want to present the best compact smartphones in the following ranking. The display size ist not as important as the actual size of the smartphone, so devices with a good screen-to-body ratio will benefit. The contenders must not surpass a length of 150 millimeters, but we will also sort out very bulky devices.

The following smartphone ranking might be interesting as well:

The Best Compact Smartphones

Pos.
Datum
Bew.
Bild
Modell
Länge
Dicke
Gewicht
SBR
Größe
Auflösung
OS
Preis ab
1
12/2020
Neu
90 %Apple iPhone 12 miniApple iPhone 12 mini
Apple A14 Bionic
Apple A14 Bionic GPU
4 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
131.57.4 mm133 g85 %5.40"2340x1080Apple iOS 14
2
11/2020
Neu
90 %Apple iPhone 12 ProApple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple A14 Bionic
Apple A14 Bionic GPU
6 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
146.77.4 mm189 g87 %6.10"2532x1170Apple iOS 14
3
11/2020
Neu
88 %Apple iPhone 12Apple iPhone 12
Apple A14 Bionic
Apple A14 Bionic GPU
4 GB Memory, 64 GB SSD
146.77.4 mm162 g85 %6.10"2532x1170Apple iOS 14
4
04/2020
87 %Huawei P40Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
148.98.5 mm175 g87 %6.10"2340x1080Android 10
5
11/2019
86 %Google Pixel 4Google Pixel 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Qualcomm Adreno 640
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
147.18.2 mm162 g78 %5.70"2280x1080Android 10
6
05/2020
85 %Apple iPhone SE 2020Apple iPhone SE 2020
Apple A13 Bionic
Apple A13 Bionic GPU
3 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
138.47.3 mm148 g65 %4.70"1334x750Apple iOS 13
7
10/2020
84 %Google Pixel 5Google Pixel 5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
Qualcomm Adreno 620
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
144.78 mm151 g87 %6.00"2340x1080Android 11
8
09/2020
84 %Google Pixel 4aGoogle Pixel 4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
Qualcomm Adreno 618
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.0
1448.2 mm143 g83 %5.80"2340x1080Android 11
9
03/2020
82 %Samsung Galaxy Z FlipSamsung Galaxy Z Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
Qualcomm Adreno 640
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
167.37.2 mm183 g82.5 %6.70"2636x1080Android 10
10
04/2016
80 %Apple iPhone SEApple iPhone SE
Apple A9
Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600
2 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
123.87.6 mm113 g61 %4.00"1136x640Apple iOS 9
11
06/2020
79 %Samsung Galaxy A41Samsung Galaxy A41
Mediatek Helio P65
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
149.97.9 mm152 g85 %6.10"2400x1080Android 10

The table above contains an overview over the best compact smartphones reviewed by Notebookcheck over the course of the past 12 months as well as still relevant and available older products. In cases of identical score the more recent device is listed first. All prices in above table and price comparisons are updated daily and can thus differ.

Editors' Comments

The final quarter of 2020 turned out to be a triple-success for Apple as they secured the first three spots on this list with their iPhone 12 mini, iPhone 12 Pro, and iPhone 12, the first of which is truly emperor among dwarfs.

1st – Apple iPhone 12 mini

Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple iPhone 12 mini

The Apple iPhone 12 mini is the new and highly anticipated iPhone SE while outperforming the latter at the same time with ease. It is also very similar overall to the larger iPhone 12. Next to other high-end smartphones, the small iPhone 12 mini seems incredibly tiny in comparison. Its 5.4-inch OLED display is very sharp, and the built-in Apple A14 is supported by 4 GB of RAM and either 64, 128, or 256 GB of storage space.

Compared to its Pro sibling the mini’s rear-facing dual-lens camera lacks the telephoto lens, the LiDAR scanner, and support for ProRAW. Apart from that we noted its bright and color-accurate display, its accurate location services, and its Sub6 5G with a wide range of supported frequencies. Due to the smaller capacity battery life was on the short side yet still acceptable.

Pricecompare

2nd – Apple iPhone 12 Pro

Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple iPhone 12 Pro

The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a well-made upgrade to last year’s devices with a design language reminiscent of iPhones of yore. The 6.1-inch display turned out to be excellent, and its triple camera is now supported by a LiDAR sensor for 3D modelling as well as portrait mode assistance in low-light situations. The rear-mounted internal magnets are new and support much more than just the brand-new wireless MagSafe charger.

We did not find too many flaws on the iPhone 12 Pro. Its peculiarities are not going to bother long-time iPhone users, and there are almost no annoying limitations worth noting. Except for maybe the lack of Bluetooth High Res Audio support and the fact that 5G is not supported in Dual SIM mode.

Pricecompare

3rd – iPhone 12

Apple iPhone 12
Apple iPhone 12

The Apple iPhone 12 is practically identical to the iPhone 12 mini from a technical perspective with the only real difference being its 6.1-inch OLED display and consequently larger body at identical thickness. Thanks to its larger case it also features a larger battery ensuring noticeably longer battery life.

In our review we noted its good dual-camera, its accurate location services, and its wide array of supported frequencies. Considering its price, we would have expected a display with a refresh rate higher than 60 Hz. Its speakers also turned out to be mediocre at best.

Pricecompare

4th – Huawei P40

Huawei P40

Who says everything needs to be “Pro”? The Huawei P40 is a compact flagship smartphone by Chinese OEM Huawei. Not only does it include top of the line high-end hardware, but it also comes at a surprisingly low price. Its 6.1-inch OLED display runs in FHD+ resolution, and the device is powered by a fast Kirin 990 SoC with 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, the latter of which can be further expanded via NM card. The device supports modern communication standards, such as Wi-Fi 6 and 5G, and features a great triple-camera setup.

We liked the P40 a lot during our review but found its lack of wireless charging and its unexpectedly low IP rating lacking. Its biggest downside, however, is the complete lack of Google services.

Pricecompare

5th – Google Pixel 4

Google Pixel 4

The Google Pixel 4 feels great in hand and can be considered a compact smartphone despite its average display-to-body ratio. Its 5.7-inch OLED display supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz. The phone is powered by a Snapdragon 855, 6 GB of RAM, and either 64 or 128 GB of non-expandable internal storage. Its dual camera includes an additional 2x optical zoom and took decent photos.

The Pixel 4 also supports wireless charging, 3D face recognition, and comes with an IP68-certification. Even though the Pixel 4 was already a bit older at the time of writing it would still receive at least two more years of updates and offered a great system performance. 

Pricecompare

6th – Apple iPhone SE2

Apple iPhone SE2
Apple iPhone SE2

Apple’s iPhone SE is based on the iPhone 8 and features the exact same case with identical footprint and somewhat antiquated display to body ratio. In return, its internal hardware is up to date as it features Apple’s fastest currently available SoC as well as numerous other noteworthy features, such as Wi-Fi 6, wireless charging, or an IP67 certification.

All in all Apple did a great job with the SE2, but it is not free of disappointments, namely the included power supply, the fairly limited single-lens camera, and its below average call quality.

Pricecompare

7th – Google Pixel 5

Google Pixel 5

The Google Pixel 5 features a 6-inch large OLED display with a good display-to-body ratio. Unlike its predecessor it no longer has any high-end ambitions but rather a healthy focus on the premium mid-range market. It comes with 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of non-expandable storage. Its plastic case feels great in hand and is IP68-certified against ingress of dust and water. Wireless charging remains supported, the dual camera now includes an extra ultra-wide angle lens, and it continues to take decent photos.

Unfortunately, the Pixel 5 lacks Wi-Fi 6 support and its speakers were actually worse than on its own predecessor. 

Pricecompare

8th – Google Pixel 4a

Google Pixel 4a

The Google Pixel 4a's main benefits are its compact design and Google’s promise of long-time update support. However, those aren’t its only benefits by far. Its Snapdragon 730G with access to 6 GB of RAM makes for a snappy system performance. Its internal storage may not be user-expandable but at 128 GB it should be sufficiently large for most users. Uncommon for its price class are the support for fast USB 3.2 Gen. 1 speeds as well as a very good headphone jack.

In return, the Pixel 4a no longer supports face detection but comes with a traditional rear-mounted fingerprint reader instead. 

Pricecompare

9th – Samsung Galaxy Z Flip

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a foldable phone inspired by the design of the folding phones of yore, and thus very compact when folded. It comes with a small Super AMOLED display on the outside that is used among other things to display notifications or control music playback. Unfolded it transforms into a 6.7-inch large smartphone powered by a Snapdragon 855+, 8 GB of RAM, and 256 GB of non-expandable internal storage.

In our review we praised the overall well-thought out concept, the great display, its good cameras, and plentiful connectivity. In return, call quality was mediocre at best.

Pricecompare

10th – Apple iPhone SE

Apple iPhone SE
Apple iPhone SE

With the iPhone SE, Apple has ventured to create a powerful new edition of the iPhone 5s and put the big iPhone's up-to-date hardware into an extremely compact case. The user does not have to accept compromises in performance or features here, since the iPhone SE also uses the powerful Apple A9-SoC.

Among others, the smartphone could impress with a high-end chassis, a great GPS receiver, good battery runtimes and a display with precise colors in our test. However, the latter has quite a high black value. Moreover, the NFC chip remains reserved for Apple Pay as in other Apple products.

The only disadvantage of the device is that there is only a 16 GB and a 64 GB variant.

Pricecompare

Top 10 in Comparison

Size Comparison

167.3 mm / 6.59 inch 73.6 mm / 2.9 inch 7.2 mm / 0.2835 inch 183 g0.4034 lbs149.9 mm / 5.9 inch 69.8 mm / 2.75 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 152 g0.3351 lbs148.9 mm / 5.86 inch 71.1 mm / 2.8 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 175 g0.3858 lbs147.1 mm / 5.79 inch 68.8 mm / 2.71 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 162 g0.3571 lbs146.7 mm / 5.78 inch 71.5 mm / 2.81 inch 7.4 mm / 0.2913 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs146.7 mm / 5.78 inch 71.5 mm / 2.81 inch 7.4 mm / 0.2913 inch 162 g0.3571 lbs144.7 mm / 5.7 inch 70.4 mm / 2.77 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 151 g0.3329 lbs144 mm / 5.67 inch 69.4 mm / 2.73 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 143 g0.3153 lbs138.4 mm / 5.45 inch 67.3 mm / 2.65 inch 7.3 mm / 0.2874 inch 148 g0.3263 lbs131.5 mm / 5.18 inch 64.2 mm / 2.53 inch 7.4 mm / 0.2913 inch 133 g0.2932 lbs123.8 mm / 4.87 inch 58.6 mm / 2.31 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 113 g0.2491 lbs

Test Results

Apple iPhone 12 mini
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
Apple iPhone 12
Huawei P40
Google Pixel 4
Apple iPhone SE 2020
Google Pixel 5
Google Pixel 4a
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Apple iPhone SE
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4.4 (2.4, 2)
4 (2, 2)
10 (5, 5)
8 (3, 5)
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
36.8 (9.2, 27.6)
6.8 (3.6, 3.2)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
4.8 (2, 2.8)
31 (17, 14)
5.6 (2.8, 2.8)
Response Time Black / White *
4 (2, 2)
3.2 (2, 1.2)
22 (19, 3)
6 (3, 3)
2.4 (1.2, 1.2)
21.2 (6, 15.2)
3.2 (1.6, 1.6)
3.6 (2, 1.6)
3.6 (2, 1.2)
22 (11, 11)
3.2 (2, 1.2)
PWM Frequency
250 (99)
277.8
226.2
245
367.6
367.6 (99)
255.1 (99)
245.1 (99)
245.1 (99)
Screen
Brightness middle
623
822
642
583
554
688
635
705
705
603
554
Brightness
623
820
639
593
550
659
636
707
709
579
559
Brightness Distribution
98
99
97
94
94
92
97
96
97
93
92
Black Level *
0.28
0.88
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
1.2
0.9
3.03
0.8
1
0.8
0.9
3.1
1.8
2
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
3.5
2.42
5.33
1.4
2.2
2.2
1.9
5.4
3.5
7.7
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.8
0.8
2
1.3
1.7
1.7
1.3
2.7
2.3
1.6
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.18 101%
2.188 101%
2.301 96%
2.22 99%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.11 104%
2.21 100%
2.11 104%
CCT
6258 104%
6337 103%
6404 101%
6621 98%
6213 105%
6790 96%
6492 100%
6576 99%
6264 104%
6955 93%
6589 99%
Contrast
2457
685
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.13
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96.74
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
30.1
34.2
37.8
39.9
35.5
40.5
33.6
38.2
38.8
44.2
36.6
Maximum Bottom *
29.1
33.5
37.3
41.3
34.5
41.4
35.5
37.1
35.8
42.8
37.7
Idle Upper Side *
28.8
27.8
30.7
31.5
27.2
36
28
27
27.7
30.9
26.2
Idle Bottom *
26.5
26.6
30.3
30.8
26.9
31.4
26.4
26.4
27.3
26.8
26.1
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
1537
2091
2602
2063
1007
1938
2245
2270
1741
1274
1843
H.264
968
1117
1135
1052
617
681
1466
1045
527
759
998
WiFi v1.3
655
781
945
806
460
694
808
669
647
673
650
Load
316
311
283
236
185
143
333
225
157
207
268
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
0.62
0.64
0.9
1
1.01
0.44
0.69
0.49
0.59
0.54
0.96
Idle Average *
1.18
1.22
1.5
1.9
1.63
1.56
0.82
0.96
0.88
1.26
1.57
Idle Maximum *
1.21
1.24
1.8
2.4
1.69
1.63
0.85
1
0.95
1.4
1.61
Load Average *
2.1
3.04
5.5
3.5
4.67
2.32
2.73
3.11
4.97
2.45
2.93
Load Maximum *
5.71
3.86
10.4
6.9
8.78
4.12
4.4
5.23
8.37
6.46
4.97

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
8736 Points ∼57%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10254 Points ∼67%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8954 Points ∼59%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8683 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
10261 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6742 Points ∼44%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
4201 Points ∼25%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
4160 Points ∼25%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
3913 Points ∼23%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2988 Points ∼18%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2573 Points ∼15%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
3281 Points ∼19%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1635 Points ∼10%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1646 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2665 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1222 Points ∼7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
1604 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
1604 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
1584 Points ∼83%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
755 Points ∼39%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
746 Points ∼39%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
1336 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
598 Points ∼31%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
549 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
738 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
357 Points ∼19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
264 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
318 fps ∼3%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
319.1 fps ∼3%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
151 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
139 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
250 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps ∼0%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
84 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
166 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80.3 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps ∼0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
59.3 fps ∼2%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
88 fps ∼3%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
45 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
59 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
59.2 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps ∼1%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
148 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps ∼20%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
174.7 fps ∼19%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
100 fps ∼11%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
75 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
149 fps ∼16%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps ∼3%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
41 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
73 fps ∼8%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps ∼2%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼16%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
59.8 fps ∼16%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
46 fps ∼13%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
67 fps ∼18%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼16%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼8%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
38 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
56 fps ∼15%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58.1 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps ∼5%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
624727 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
569468 Points ∼76%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
552897 Points ∼74%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
450373 Points ∼60%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
376698 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
489463 Points ∼65%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
288970 Points ∼38%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
269238 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
463291 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
157473 Points ∼21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
3041 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
2975 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
3054 Points ∼57%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4242 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4199 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
2892 Points ∼54%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3547 Points ∼67%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3247 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4201 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1749 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2296 Points ∼43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
6281 Points ∼54%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
6917 Points ∼60%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
7282 Points ∼63%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6244 Points ∼54%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6214 Points ∼54%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
4573 Points ∼40%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2106 Points ∼18%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2310 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
6314 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2524 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1016 Points ∼9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
5079 Points ∼25%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
5344 Points ∼26%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
5569 Points ∼27%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
5651 Points ∼28%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5615 Points ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
4050 Points ∼20%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2315 Points ∼11%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2468 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
5679 Points ∼28%
Apple iPhone SE
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2298 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1160 Points ∼6%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
66.4 MB/s ∼76%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
MB/s ∼0%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
67 MB/s ∼77%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
81.6 MB/s ∼85%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
MB/s ∼0%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
MB/s ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
83.01 MB/s ∼86%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
197 MB/s ∼62%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
146.64 MB/s ∼46%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
155.87 MB/s ∼49%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
187.39 MB/s ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
212.87 MB/s ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
72.53 MB/s ∼23%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
189.4 MB/s ∼51%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
122.38 MB/s ∼33%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
138.93 MB/s ∼38%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
162.89 MB/s ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
184.51 MB/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
84 MB/s ∼23%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
212.9 MB/s ∼16%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
247.73 MB/s ∼19%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189.99 MB/s ∼14%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
246.79 MB/s ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
523.39 MB/s ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
211.05 MB/s ∼16%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1591.6 MB/s ∼78%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655.4 MB/s ∼32%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
851.37 MB/s ∼42%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
502.06 MB/s ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1442.56 MB/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
299.89 MB/s ∼15%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
191 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
193 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
194 Points ∼66%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
95 Points ∼32%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
94 Points ∼32%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
146 Points ∼49%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
77 Points ∼26%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
71 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
98 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
52 Points ∼18%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
578 (496min - 596max) MBit/s ∼24%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
527 (457min - 562max) MBit/s ∼22%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
566 (363min - 614max) MBit/s ∼24%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1368 (1104min - 1442max) MBit/s ∼58%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
526 (413min - 655max) MBit/s ∼22%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
618 (321min - 653max) MBit/s ∼26%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
625 (521min - 652max) MBit/s ∼26%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
668 (592min - 685max) MBit/s ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
605 (299min - 640max) MBit/s ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
365 (349min - 370max) MBit/s ∼15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone 12 mini
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
792 (711min - 841max) MBit/s ∼33%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 256 GB NVMe
736 (667min - 787max) MBit/s ∼31%
Apple iPhone 12
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
840 (797min - 876max) MBit/s ∼35%
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1296 (1095min - 1376max) MBit/s ∼55%
Google Pixel 4
Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (564min - 609max) MBit/s ∼25%
Apple iPhone SE 2020
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
818 (400min - 892max) MBit/s ∼35%
Google Pixel 5
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
483 (479min - 493max) MBit/s ∼20%
Google Pixel 4a
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
620 (560min - 703max) MBit/s ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
474 (405min - 541max) MBit/s ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A41
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio P65, 64 GB eMMC Flash
349 (339min - 355max) MBit/s ∼15%
Read all 7 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > The Best Compact Smartphones
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-07- 8 (Update: 2021-01-22)