Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPhone 15 Plus review – The iPhone with an extra-large display and powerful battery

Finally USB, but only slow. Not only does the iPhone 15 Plus offer a large display, but it also gets the Dynamic Island for the first time this year. In addition, there is a higher resolution main camera, a slightly more powerful battery, more computing power, and USB-C. All that, Apple tops with a slightly lower price than last year.
(photo: Daniel Schmidt)

The Apple iPhone 15 Plus is the direct successor of the iPhone 14 Plus and the larger sibling of the iPhone 15. Only its display size, dimensions, and battery power differ from the latter.

But some pleasant news first: the iPhone Plus is becoming more affordable. The entry level price drops by 50 Euros (~$53), resulting in an MSRP of 1,099 Euros (~$1161) for the smallest storage equipment version, which is also our test unit. It is possible that this can be traced back to the exchange rates, which are currently more beneficial for Europe. The following table shows all the prices:

Storage iPhone 15 Plus iPhone 14 Plus Difference
128 GB 1,099 EUR (~$1,161) 1,149 EUR (~$1,214) -50 EUR (~$53) (-4,35 %)
256 GB 1,229 EUR (~$1,299) 1,279 EUR (~$1,352) -50 EUR (~$53) (-3,91 %)
512 GB 1,479 EUR (~$1,563) 1,539 EUR (~$1,626) -60 EUR (~$63) (-3,90 %)

The basic design of the iPhone 15 Plus remains the same, only in front you now can see the Dynamic Island, which replaces the notch. Another obvious change is the replacement of the Lightning port with USB-C. In addition, the Apple smartphone received a more powerful SoC and now also a 48-MP camera that we already know from the iPhone 14 Pro. Our test shows all the details. 

Apple iPhone 15 Plus (iPhone 15 Series)
Processor
Apple A16 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.5 GHz, Crete
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2796 x 1290 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive, Super Retina XDR display, OLED, Ceramic shield, fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 110.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Barometer, high dynamic range gyroscope, high-g accelerometer, proximity sensor, digital compass, OTG, UWB (Gen. 2)
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 160.9 x 77.8 ( = 0.31 x 6.33 x 3.06 in)
Battery
4383 mAh Lithium-Ion, MagSafe wireless charging up to 15 W, Qi up to 7.5 W
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 17
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (26 mm, f/1.6, sensor‑shift optical image stabilization, 100% Focus Pixels) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, 13 mm, f/2.4, 120 °)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.9, autofocus with Focus Pixels) + Face ID
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: onscreen, USB-C cable (1 m), SIM tool, Apple sticker, documentation, 12 Months Warranty, Single-band GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeidDou, Galileo, QZSS; IP68; head/body-SAR: 0.98 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
201 g ( = 7.09 oz / 0.44 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
1099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.7 %
11/2023
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
201 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89 %
12/2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7
213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
90.3 %
03/2023
Samsung Galaxy S23+
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
195 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.60"2340x1080
86 %
08/2023
Honor 90 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
183 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2664x1200
88.1 %
10/2023
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11
206 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220

Case - Matte aluminum and glass

All the colors of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus (photo: Apple)
All the colors

The exterior of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus remains almost unchanged from the predecessor. The height is the same, but the smartphone is now 0.3 mm (~0.012 in) slimmer and its length has increased by 0.1 mm (~0.004 in). The camera in the back sticks out by up to 3.5 mm (~0.14 in).

The iPhone 15 Plus has a matte aluminum frame and the glass in the back is also matte, preventing fingerprints from showing. The edges are now slightly rounded, making the Apple smartphone more comfortable to hold in the hand than its predecessor. Even if it is 2 grams (~0.07 oz) lighter than the iPhone 14 Plus, at 201 grams (~7 oz) it surely is not a lightweight.

The workmanship is really good. Only the gaps between the glass in the back and the frame aren't completely even in our test unit, and the iPhone 15 Plus produces some slight creaking noises from the insides when trying to warp it.

The smartphone is water and dustproof according to the IP68 standard. It is available in blue, rosé, yellow, green, and black color.

 (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
 (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
 (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
 (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
 (photo: Daniel Schmidt)

Size Comparison

162.6 mm / 6.4 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 213 g0.4696 lbs162.2 mm / 6.39 inch 75.7 mm / 2.98 inch 8.62 mm / 0.3394 inch 206 g0.4542 lbs161.9 mm / 6.37 inch 74.1 mm / 2.92 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 183 g0.4034 lbs160.9 mm / 6.33 inch 77.8 mm / 3.06 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 201 g0.4431 lbs160.8 mm / 6.33 inch 78.1 mm / 3.07 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 203 g0.4475 lbs157.8 mm / 6.21 inch 76.2 mm / 3 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Equipment - iPhone 15 Plus comes with Dynamic Island

The equipment of the iPhone 15 Plus shows several differences compared to its predecessor. For one, it forgoes the Lightning port for the first time, replacing it with USB-C. Then the notch has also disappeared and is replaced by the Dynamic Island, where the front camera and Face ID are embedded in the display. In contrast to the iPhone 15 Pro Max, the 15 Plus doesn't offer an action key but continues to use the already known silencing key.

In terms of data transfer, the USB port only uses the 2.0 standard, which offers the same speed as the Lightning port before. In a copy test using an externally connected M2.SSD (Samsung 980 Pro in Asus ROG Strix Arion, USB 3.2 Gen. 2), at least the data is transferred at 40.43 MB/s. For connected storage media, the FAT32, exFAT, NTFS (read only), Mac OS Extended, and APFS file systems are supported. Considering the price class, a faster USB standard would have been more appropriate. In terms of wired display output, Apple doesn't make as many compromises, since it is possible to use Ultra HD with HDR at best.

In addition, MagSafe, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, and an ultrawide band chip (UWB) of the 2nd generation are also integrated.

Top (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Top (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Left side: SIM slot, volume, silencing key (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Left side: SIM slot, volume, silencing key (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Right side: power (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Right side: power (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Bottom: speaker, USB, microphone (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Bottom: speaker, USB, microphone (photo: Daniel Schmidt)

Software - iOS 17 for the Apple smartphone

While the Apple iPhone 15 Plus was originally delivered with iOS 17, it already received several updates during our testing period, ending up with version 17.1. Apple doesn't offer any specifics on the update period, but we can assume that it will get updates for at least five years.

With the Dynamic Island, there is an additional notification and operation element that we already know from the iPhone 14 Pro and 14 Pro Max.

We already gave some detailed information on the changes with iOS 17 in our test of the iPhone 15 Pro Max, and Apple also provides some information on this on a specific web page.

When Dynamic Island is inactive, it is faded out on the screenshots.
Quickmenu
With Dynamic Island activated
Expanded Dynamic Island
Standby is also supported on the iPhone 15 Plus.

Communication and GNSS - Exact locating but no 6-GHz WLAN

To connect with the mobile Internet, the iPhone 15 Plus is able to offer a very wide frequency support. In everyday operation, the smartphone shows good reception qualities in city surroundings.

For WLAN, Wi-Fi 6 is available at best, which isn't really appropriate considering the price class. At least support of Wi-Fi 6E and its connected 6-GHz frequency band would have been more suitable. On the other hand, the transfer rates are fairly decent and very constant.

Networking
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
749 (min: 725) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
825 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼46%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1491) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1810 (min: 1724) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1804 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1403) MBit/s ∼91%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
910 (min: 839) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
939 (min: 470) MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 948) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
988 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1857 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1686 (min: 1654) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
720 (min: 599) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
789 (min: 533) MBit/s ∼44%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
651 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
687 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼81%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø749 (725-758)
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (839-954)
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø825 (774-865)
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (470-967)

To determine its location, the iPhone 15 Plus is able to use all the global satellite networks, but only with single-band support. Despite this limitation, the Apple smartphone is able to locate itself very accurately in our test.

On a short bike tour, we compare it against the Garmin Venu 2. With an overall route length of almost 10 kilometers (~6.2 miles), the difference between the route recordings of both devices is only 20 meters (~66 ft). The iPhone also doesn't show any larger deviations in the detailed route recording.

GNSS test: around the lake
GNSS test: around the lake
GNSS test: turning point
GNSS test: turning point
GNSS test: overview
GNSS test: overview

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality

In terms of its SIM support, the iPhone 15 Plus doesn't lack anything that is offered by the Pro models. In Germany, you continue to have the option to use a physical Nano-SIM card, which you can then also combine with an additional eSIM. Alternatively, you can also use it in pure dual-eSIM operation. Functions such as VoLTE and WLAN calls are also supported.

Using the earpiece, the iPhone 15 Plus produces a natural voice quality on both sides of the conversation. Surrounding noises are filtered out fairly reliably, with only a few loud noises such as traffic noise getting through from time to time. The speaker also produces an attractive voice quality, even though there can be some slight echo at times.

Cameras - iPhone 15 Plus with 48 MP and 2x zoom

Selfie taken with the iPhone 15 Plus (Portrait mode)
Selfie taken with the iPhone 15 Plus (Portrait mode)

The iPhone 15 Plus again uses an identical front camera with 12 MP. It offers autofocus and delivers good results as long as there is sufficient light. It is able to record videos in Ultra HD resolution at up to 60 FPS.

For the first time, the main camera now uses a 48-MP sensor that is able to provide optical image stabilization (OIS) with sensor shifting. Via pixel binning, you can optionally create 12 MP or 24 MP recordings. The iPhone 15 Plus doesn't include an optical zoom, instead using a similar method as the Sony Xperia 5 V, which makes use of the high resolution of the main camera for an almost lossless digital zoom (always 12 MP). The results are attractive, but those who want to get even closer will quickly lose some of the quality.

In addition, there is also an ultrawide angle sensor, although its basic noise level is fairly high, delivering useful results only for social media at best.

The Apple smartphone continues to be able to record videos in Ultra HD resolution at up to 60 FPS and with Dolby Vision. Cinema mode with adjustable Bokeh level is also available in 4k at up to 30 FPS. You only have to live without Apple ProRes and ProRAW.

iPhone 15 Plus (26 mm)iPhone 15 Plus (52 mm)
iPhone 15 Plus (26 mm)
iPhone 15 Plus (52 mm)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

We run some additional tests with the camera of the iPhone 15 Plus under controlled light conditions in our lab. The recording of the ColorChecker chart succeeds in looking quite natural. Only the green color tones have elevated DeltaE values, with all of them being reproduced too bright and saturated. The test chart is recorded with a high detail level, only showing some minimal blurriness in the edge areas.

Pictures taken in very little light (1 Lux) are brightened heavily by the automatic night mode. In our test, the automatic chose a 2-second exposure time, which isn't easy to manage anymore holding the phone in the hand. 

ColorChecker
9.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 15 Plus: 9.07 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 16.94 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.1 ∆E
13 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
17 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9 ∆E
15 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 15 Plus: 15.5 ∆E min: 9 - max: 23.21 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Meager box contents

The contents of the iPhone 15 Plus box turn out very meager, with only a USB cable (USB 2.0), a SIM tool, and an Apple sticker included in the box. However, Apple offers numerous additional optional accessories such as cases and chargers at its online shop.

The warranty is only for 12 months, although this doesn't affect the legally required warranty requirements (of 2 years in Germany). Apple continues to offer the 2-year Care+ insurance package for a one-time cost of 199 Euros (~$214). This includes unlimited repairs for accidental damage, an express replacement service, and priority support. Depending on the damage, there might also be some additional costs. For 269 Euros (~$289), you can also get an insurance against theft or loss, with a limit of two cases a year. If you prefer, you can also pay monthly for the services (9.99 or 13.49 Euros, ~$10.72 or $14.48), which includes a two-year duration but can also go for longer.

Input Devices and Operation - iPhone 15 Plus comes without an Action key

The capacitive touchscreen of the iPhone 15 Plus offers very good sliding characteristics and implements inputs very accurately. However, our test unit still shows some slight stutter from time to time, which surely cannot only be traced back to the 60-Hz panel. The iPad Air 4, for example, uses the same refresh rate with a weaker SoC, and its operation is still extremely smooth.

Face ID provides biometric security, with its sensors being located in the Dynamic Island. The face recognition is considered very secure and works reliably and quickly. The Action key that we know from the Pro models can nowhere be found in the iPhone 15 Plus, but there continues to be a purely mechanic silencing key.

The Taptic Engine handles vibrations. This is an electromagnetic linear motor that ensures crisp and haptically pleasing feedback. Other functions such as AssistiveTouch, single-hand mode, or tapping gestures for the back continue to be included.

Display - Brighter but only 60 Hz again

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The 6.7-inch (17.02 cm) display of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus offers a very high pixel density of 460 PPI, and its contents look correspondingly sharp and crisp. However, the refresh rate is only a fixed 60 Hz, which is not up to the current standards of a smartphone beyond the 1,000-Euro price limit anymore. The smartphone supports the HLG, HDR10, and Dolby Vision HDR standards.

The brightness has increased compared to the iPhone 14 Plus predecessor, now reaching up to 1,045 cd/m² with activated brightness sensor and pure white display content. In one measurement with activated HDR, we are even able to get up to 2,397 cd/m² from the panel. Apple actually only speaks about 1,600 nits for HDR and up to 2,000 nits outdoors. Those who adjust the brightness manually will get a maximum of up to 872 cd/m².

In our measurement at minimum display brightness with the oscilloscope, the iPhone 15 Plus reveals a constant flickering at 60 Hz, whose amplitude remains stable. The flicker meter even shows up to 480 Hz for the smartphone, but sensitive users may still encounter some difficulties using the panel. 

1039
cd/m²
1031
cd/m²
1044
cd/m²
1043
cd/m²
1044
cd/m²
1037
cd/m²
1045
cd/m²
1035
cd/m²
1043
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Super Retina XDR display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1045 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1040.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1044 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70
Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2340x1080, 6.60
Honor 90 5G
AMOLED, 2664x1200, 6.70
Xiaomi 13T Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70
Screen
8%
-37%
-23%
-4%
-2%
Brightness middle
1044
1510
45%
1128
8%
1180
13%
1252
20%
797
-24%
Brightness
1040
1467
41%
1136
9%
1202
16%
1230
18%
800
-23%
Brightness Distribution
99
92
-7%
99
0%
88
-11%
96
-3%
97
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.1
8%
2.7
-125%
1.5
-25%
1.4
-17%
0.97
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
3.8
-58%
4.5
-88%
4.8
-100%
3.1
-29%
1.76
27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.7
19%
2.6
-24%
2.8
-33%
2.3
-10%
2.3
-10%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.23 99%
2.05 107%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.531 87%
CCT
6411 101%
6670 97%
6644 98%
6489 100%
6590 99%
6492 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
minimum
25% display brightness
25%
50% display brightness
50%
75% display brightness
75%
maximum manual display brightness
100%

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness adjustments

The iPhone 15 Plus masters the color reproduction of the display really well and no color deviations can be seen with the bare eyes, at least when the True Tone function remains deactivated. However, using this feature is more gentle on the eyes, since only then, the white balance is automatically adjusted to the surrounding light, although this also results in warmer color tones.

Grayscale (without True Tone, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (without True Tone, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (without True Tone, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (without True Tone, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (without True Tone, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (without True Tone, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (without True Tone, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (without True Tone, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.83 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.901 ms rise
↘ 0.931 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.763 ms rise
↘ 1.499 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Outdoors, the iPhone 15 Plus leaves a very good impression, also benefitting from its display surface that only shows few reflections. In this way, the display always remains easily readable, even on sunny days.

Outdoors (photo: Daniel Schmidt)
Outdoors (photo: Daniel Schmidt)

The viewing angle stability of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus is also very good. Even from very steep viewing angles, there is only a minimal loss in brightness without any noticeable colored veil.

Viewing angle stability of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Viewing angle stability of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus

Performance - iPhone with Apple A16 Bionic

The iPhone 15 Plus is run by the Apple A16 Bionic processor, which was used in the iPhone 14 Pro and 14 Pro Max for the first time. The SoC is able to use 6 GB of working memory and promises a high performance.

This is also confirmed by the benchmark results. In terms of the CPU performance, the iPhone doesn't have to shy away from any comparison, despite only offering last year's SoC. The AI performance also turns out high. However, we continue to notice some small stutters in everyday operation, and Apple still has some room for optimization here.

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2644 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (2465 - 2644, n=4)
2576 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -33%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1491 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=104, last 2 years)
1399 Points -47%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
1119 Points -58%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
6673 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (6019 - 6923, n=4)
6576 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=104, last 2 years)
3865 Points -42%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3787 Points -43%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
3261 Points -51%
Antutu v10
Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1508318 Points +8%
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1391899 - 1464078, n=3)
1421055 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1391899 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=51, last 2 years)
1249818 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -20%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
714232 Points -49%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
714232 Points -49%
CPU
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (368487 - 390270, n=3)
379550 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
368487 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
363615 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
345391 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (86841 - 479443, n=51, last 2 years)
316783 Points -14%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
226129 Points -39%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
226129 Points -39%
GPU
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
611661 Points +37%
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (446274 - 478636, n=3)
457588 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (42603 - 912343, n=51, last 2 years)
449031 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
446274 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
370494 Points -17%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
170281 Points -62%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
170281 Points -62%
MEM
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
268488 Points +4%
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (251912 - 267325, n=3)
258811 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
257195 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (68805 - 434560, n=51, last 2 years)
246526 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
185258 Points -28%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
170329 Points -34%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
170329 Points -34%
UX
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (319943 - 327847, n=3)
325106 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
319943 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
264554 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83150 - 370629, n=51, last 2 years)
237370 Points -26%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
212363 Points -34%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
147493 Points -54%
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
147493 Points -54%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1260 - 1332, n=3)
1307 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1190 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
941 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
704 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Honor 90 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288
46207 Points +76%
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (26240 - 39328, n=4)
32333 Points +23%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
26240 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points -95%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -96%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1135 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1016 - 1135, n=3)
1065 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
620 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (215 - 1418, n=19, last 2 years)
604 Points -47%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
430 Points -62%
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2443 Points +11%
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (2207 - 2540, n=3)
2423 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2207 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (474 - 2842, n=19, last 2 years)
1780 Points -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1085 Points -51%
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3377 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (3170 - 3377, n=4)
3235 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
2026 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=17, last 2 years)
1668 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
672 Points -80%

Although the Apple A16 Bionic GPU doesn't support hardware-based raytracing yet, it still delivers a good performance in this regard, even if some competitors such as the Galaxy S23 (Adreno 740) or Xiaomi 13T Pro (Immortalis-G715 MP11) offer an even higher performance.

That is not only the case for the raytracing performance (3DMark), but also in general, since the iPhone also does worse in the offscreen benchmarks of GFXBench.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points +35%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3011 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2803 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2730 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -12%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points +24%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3099 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3067 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2946 Points -5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -22%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -72%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12268 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11678 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11543 Points -6%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -27%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3137 Points -74%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5603 Points +29%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5098 Points +17%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
4347 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5583 Points +47%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5103 Points +35%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3790 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.8 fps 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
504 fps +6%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
474 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
438.1 fps -8%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -27%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
158 fps -67%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.8 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps +7%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
254 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
250 fps -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -31%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +92%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.8 fps 0%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
193 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
191 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
171.2 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -41%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +82%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +35%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.4 fps -1%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -47%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
113 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
103.2 fps -9%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
103 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -34%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +81%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
49.4 fps -9%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +21%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
52 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
40.1 fps -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -29%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps +52%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +30%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.8 fps 0%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
140 fps
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
122.2 fps -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -30%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -65%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +36%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps +23%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
22 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
20.1 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -27%
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -64%

The iPhone 15 Plus performs flawlessly when surfing the web. This is the case with both the subjective surfing behavior as well as the benchmarks, where the Apple smartphone easily leaves the competitors behind.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple A16 Bionic (228 - 282, n=4)
262 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)
228.264 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)
189.278 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
176.612 Points -23%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
136.736 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -54%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -54%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
64.3 Points -72%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)
419 runs/min
Average Apple A16 Bionic (327 - 419, n=4)
373 runs/min -11%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)
347 runs/min -17%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
176 runs/min -58%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -62%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
150 runs/min -64%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -74%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
61.8 runs/min -85%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple A16 Bionic (201 - 202, n=2)
202 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)
188 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
151 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
95 Points
Honor 90 5G (Chrome 115)
58 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)
75718 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic (68554 - 75718, n=4)
72639 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)
64255 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
60423 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -35%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
36482 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points -56%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
21143 Points -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)
2686.1 ms * -497%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -254%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
1143.43 ms * -154%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -87%
Samsung Galaxy S23+ (Chrome 110.0.5481.65)
699 ms * -55%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus (Safari 16)
507.3 ms * -13%
Average Apple A16 Bionic (450 - 506, n=4)
475 ms * -6%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)
450.2 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Games - iPhone 15 Plus with a maximum of 60 FPS

The iPhone 15 Plus fulfills all the requirements for a good gaming smartphone: a powerful GPU, a large display, and good dual-speakers. Unfortunately, we are unable to show you any measurements with GameBench, since that hasn't been optimized for iOS 17 yet. However, we will add those as soon as possible.

At the same time, we already tried playing PUBG Mobile and Genshin Impact on the Apple smartphone. Both of these games run very smoothly, even at the highest detail level. In Genshin Impact, only the medium detail level is preset at a maximum of 30 FPS, but this can be changed easily.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
No graph data

Emissions - Two speakers for the iPhone 15 Plus

Temperatures

Even though the surface temperatures of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus warm up noticeably under load, they still remain below 40 °C (104 °F).

In the stress tests of 3DMark, the Apple smartphone shows some loss in performance on the long run, but it is still faster than a Galaxy S23+.

Max. Load
 34.8 °C
95 F
35.1 °C
95 F
35.3 °C
96 F
 
 37.5 °C
100 F
36.2 °C
97 F
35.4 °C
96 F
 
 38.4 °C
101 F
38 °C
100 F
36.6 °C
98 F
 
Maximum: 38.4 °C = 101 F
Average: 36.4 °C = 98 F
36.6 °C
98 F
37.1 °C
99 F
36.6 °C
98 F
36.9 °C
98 F
37.9 °C
100 F
37.1 °C
99 F
37.9 °C
100 F
39.5 °C
103 F
39.2 °C
103 F
Maximum: 39.5 °C = 103 F
Average: 37.6 °C = 100 F
Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +21%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
82 %
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % -4%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.2 % -10%
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
65.6 % -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.6 % -35%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 90 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +36%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.7 % +5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +4%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
73.3 %
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
66.1 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.8 % -21%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.3 % +16%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
74.4 %
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø14.5 (13.9-18.9)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.3 (13.4-23.1)
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø51.1 (48.8-59.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.7 (43-80.2)
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø9.46 (9.26-10.2)
Apple iPhone 15 Plus A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø9.72 (9.25-12.4)

Speaker

The two speakers of the Apple iPhone 15 Plus produce a relatively good sound, but high-pitched voices can sound a bit hollow when playing music and the lower frequencies are not pronounced enough.

Those who prefer headphones or other external devices for sound can use either the USB connection or Bluetooth. But Apple still doesn't offer a High-Res codec for the latter, and users are forced to be content with AAC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.433.22525.728312133.84018.729.8502834.86324.931.68021.634.210018.743.712516.353.316020.256.320015.55525017.257.231520.75940018.260.650013.569.96301471.480013.972.7100012.974.8125014.676.5160013.276200013.477.5250013.880.3315013.480.3400013.681.6500014.179.6630013.581.3800013.580.21000013.777.41250013.971.91600013.258.3SPL26.790.6N0.885median 13.9median 74.8Delta1.59.333.836.827.940.224.336.528.236.236.742.222.239.325.440.22140.718.647.915.455.515.157.113.161.41261.812.763.311.868.512.967.710.472.613.376.813.278.712.181.412.281.912.981.414.880.315.881.416.180.214.481.813.680.613.575.814.471.11567.625.991.80.790.6median 13.5median 75.81.39.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 15 PlusSamsung Galaxy S23+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 15 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - The battery increases to 4,383 mAh

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the iPhone 15 Plus is fairly high during idle operation at maximum display brightness, but the panel is also very bright, needing a correspondingly high amount of power.

The Apple smartphone can be charged with a wired charger at up to 20 watts, with a full charge needing less than 2 hours. In our test, the 50% mark was reached after 28 minutes. Alternatively, you can also charge the smartphone via MagSafe at up to 15 watts or wirelessly (Qi) at up to 7.5 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.85 / 0.09 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.71 / 2.09 / 2.11 Watt
Load midlight 4.32 / 6.25 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
4383 mAh
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23+
4700 mAh
Honor 90 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
4323 mAh
Average Apple A16 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
24%
-34%
-49%
-5%
5%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.71
0.63
11%
0.64
10%
1.19
-68%
0.99
-39%
0.7
1%
0.695 ?(0.56 - 0.9, n=4)
2%
Idle Average *
2.09
1.47
30%
0.88
58%
1.71
18%
1.14
45%
1.1
47%
1.54 ?(1 - 2.09, n=4)
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.11
1.55
27%
0.94
55%
1.82
14%
1.34
36%
1.4
34%
1.59 ?(1.1 - 2.11, n=4)
25%
Load Average *
4.32
8.45
-96%
4.18
3%
6.8
-57%
10.06
-133%
6.5
-50%
4.4 ?(3.42 - 6, n=4)
-2%
Load Maximum *
6.25
8.63
-38%
6.59
-5%
10.93
-75%
15.94
-155%
9.8
-57%
7.84 ?(5.56 - 13.6, n=4)
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.48 (0.956-9.12)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.63 (0.82-14.8)
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.88 (0.855-0.924)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.746 (0.695-0.926)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.27 (5.7-6.92)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.4 (11.2-13.4)
Apple iPhone 15 Plus Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.88 (0.855-0.924)
Samsung Galaxy S23+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.746 (0.695-0.926)

Battery Life

The battery of the iPhone 15 Plus is slightly larger than that of the predecessor, with the runtimes turning out correspondingly longer. Only in the Reader’s Test at minimum display brightness, the values drop considerably, even though they are still at an excellent level.

The values are easiest to compare at an adjusted display brightness (150 cd/m²). While surfing using the the WLAN, they are at the same level as those of the Xiaomi 13T Pro and are only surpassed by the Galaxy S23+. With a continuous video reproduction loop (offline), the iPhone 15 Plus places on top of the comparison field.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
41h 20min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 17)
18h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
26h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 36min
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
4383 mAh
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23+
4700 mAh
Honor 90 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
4323 mAh
Battery Runtime
-35%
6%
-33%
-5%
6%
Reader / Idle
2480
1344
-46%
2585
4%
1239
-50%
1798
-27%
3324
34%
H.264
1585
1122
-29%
1524
-4%
990
-38%
1298
-18%
1520
-4%
WiFi v1.3
1102
760
-31%
1196
9%
901
-18%
1099
0%
1085
-2%
Load
336
220
-35%
385
15%
247
-26%
427
27%
325
-3%

Pros

+ bright and accurate display
+ fast SoC
+ very fast battery life
+ IP68 certification
+ wireless charging
+ accurate GNSS

Cons

- only USB 2.0
- no 6 GHz WLAN
- slow charging
- no High-Res via Bluetooth
- only a 12-month warranty
- no always-on display

Verdict - More than just USB

Testing the Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Testing the Apple iPhone 15 Plus

The iPhone 15 Plus doesn't represent a great leap but still offers some interesting improvements. Those include not only the newly required USB connector but also the Dynamic Island, the new main camera, and the brighter display.

The qualities of the predecessor also remain: The smartphone is able to determine its own location very accurately, and the battery lasts for a really long time. In addition, the case is again water and dustproof according to the IP68 standard. Wireless charging and UWB also continues to be supported.

The Apple iPhone 15 Plus is a very good smartphone, but it doesn't offer some of the features that have become standard in its price class at this point.

On the other hand, the iPhone still gives some reasons for complaint. One of them is the lack of 6-GHz WLAN. But particularly the low refresh rate isn't up to the current standards anymore, and we were very surprised to encounter some stutters in the system. It also would have been better, if Apple had provided higher transfer rates with the USB port, and the charging times also turn out fairly long.

For those who don't necessarily need to stay within the Apple universe, the Sony Xperia 5 V or Samsung Galaxy S23+ might also be some interesting alternatives. If it has to be Apple but doesn't absolutely need to include USB, the iPhone 14 Pro Max is currently probably the better choice.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Price and Availability

The iPhone 15 Plus can be purchased directly from Apple starting from $899 but is also available from other vendors such as Amazon.

Apple iPhone 15 Plus - 11/03/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
67 / 70 → 95%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
94%
Games Performance
69 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
91 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
76%
Average
84%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The manufacturer did not receive a copy of this review before publication, nor was there any obligation to publish it.

Pricecompare

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Apple iPhone 15 Plus review – The iPhone with an extra-large display and powerful battery
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-11- 5 (Update: 2023-11- 5)